- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/25/15 at 1:46 pm to dreaux
quote:
Also...by the same logic..Florida state should've beat the crap out of Oregon since Florida state has had top 3 recruiting classes since jimbo has been there.
By the same logic...will muschamp would've never been fired.
It is always great to see people use exceptions as proof. And use the word logic while stating a completely illogical position.
Posted on 1/25/15 at 4:39 pm to dreaux
quote:
dreaux
Don't give me this coulda woulda shoulda bullshite.
Also, what logic are you talking about? I've said they can win conference titles, but when is the last time a team loaded with 2 and 3 star recruits, won a national title?
What you are saying doesn't answer my question. I will ask you some additional ones however.
What does Muschamp failing have to do with anything? What does FSU failing have to do with what I am talking about? To make it to a national championship, and win it you have to be loaded talent wise on your two deep and have good coaching.
Posted on 1/25/15 at 4:56 pm to Datbayoubengal
People always use the crap well there are 1000s of 2 and 3 stars and only 40 5 stars. Well no shyt obviously Florida Atlantic and Akron aren't getting good players. I want to know the ratio of draft picks 5 stars vs 3 and 2 stars but only at 25 programs.
Posted on 1/26/15 at 12:33 am to LSUDonMCO
quote:Jesus, what a load of crap... "More often than not a 2 or 3 star player is better than a 5 star".
No. I know we should go after really good players. My point is, that more often than not, a 2 or 3 star who works his arse off turns out to be better than a 5 star who has always relied on God given talent and never had to work hard.
This post was edited on 1/26/15 at 12:37 am
Posted on 1/26/15 at 12:42 am to EyeoftheTiger 2015
That's nearly a top 20 class every year. Not great but not terrible.
Also, they play in a league that hasn't been very consistently good lately.
Finally, they get smoked by good teams. Maybe if they had more depth they'd win against LSU, auburn and Obie state instead of get manhandled. This level isn't about who has the best starting lineup. It's about who has the best 2 deep.
Also, they play in a league that hasn't been very consistently good lately.
Finally, they get smoked by good teams. Maybe if they had more depth they'd win against LSU, auburn and Obie state instead of get manhandled. This level isn't about who has the best starting lineup. It's about who has the best 2 deep.
This post was edited on 1/26/15 at 12:45 am
Posted on 1/26/15 at 4:29 am to LSUDonMCO
quote:
Not one starter on either the Patriots or Seahawks was a 5 star and the majority were 2 or 3's. All that matters is can they play. LINK
Now tell us how many were 1st round draft picks
Posted on 1/26/15 at 7:59 am to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
Stars are based on hype nothing else.
then why do teams that recruit the highest-rated kids end up doing the best? when was the last time a team won a title without great talent?
is winning based on the hype of recruits these days?
Posted on 1/26/15 at 8:02 am to LSUDonMCO
I forgot that the recruiting services rank these 17 year olds according to how good of a pro they'll be not how much of a college star they'll be
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News