- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why Instant-Replay is Ruining Sports
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:03 pm
5
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:03 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Stupid
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:05 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
That blog sucked, no attempt to even make a compelling argument.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:05 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Stupid
And it gets worse:
quote:
Who cares? It’s only sports. Aren’t there more important things to get right?
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:05 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
The problem here isn't replay, it's an absurd rule that is so unclear that even the refs misapply it.
The fact that Dallas wins this game if it's played in 2005 shows just how absurd that rule is, even though it wasn't even relevant to the play in question. It needs to be done away with.
The fact that Dallas wins this game if it's played in 2005 shows just how absurd that rule is, even though it wasn't even relevant to the play in question. It needs to be done away with.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:06 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:19 pm to Roger Klarvin
The rule was correctly applied. But your tears are delicious.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:21 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The fact that Dallas wins this game if it's played in 2005 shows just how absurd that rule is, even though it wasn't even relevant to the play in question. It needs to be done away with.
Wait what? Dallas couldn't stop Green Bay from driving down the field when Green Bay was conceding 2 of its 3 downs running in a stacked box to kill the clock. They were somehow gonna do it when Green Bay would use 4 downs and no passing constraints?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:22 pm to Roger Klarvin
Tony Romo is just a bad qb. Don't blame the rules. Just threw it up for grabs on 4th down without going through his progressions.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:23 pm to LNCHBOX
Rule was not correctly applied. Care to explain how the process wasn't complete after 3 feet and a lunge for the endzone?? (With control the entire time).
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:24 pm to CecilShortsHisPants
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/21 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:25 pm to CecilShortsHisPants
He never had possession and the ball popped out after hitting the ground. It's been explained a million times. Choosing to ignore it makes you either a Dallas homer, or ignorant.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:29 pm to Roger Klarvin
Yeah, it's a bummer and I hate Dallas, but I give you no sympathy as I had to watch my teams last great shot at a likely Super Bowl ruined from the frick Rule in New England.
Like the frick rule, this rule will also be changed, but it doesn't change anything before it unfortunately.
Like the frick rule, this rule will also be changed, but it doesn't change anything before it unfortunately.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:32 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
He never had possession
If you truly think he never had possession then you are
quote:
ignorant
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:33 pm to gallagherkck
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/21 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:35 pm to graychef
quote:
He was in the act of falling.
Doesn't matter because the rule book says extending the ball is a football move which negates the rule.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:35 pm to graychef
Possession, knee/leg down, elbow down, lunging for goal line.
Sucks, but whatever. It's bad for the game of football, period.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:35 pm to gallagherkck
He made have had possession at one point, correct.
The problem is he did not maintain possession
The problem is he did not maintain possession
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:36 pm to Roger Klarvin
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/21 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:38 pm to graychef
quote:
Yes but the act of falling negates the three steps/elbow argument. Then it becomes whether he made a football move.
He did, so I'm not sure what your point is? The rule book specifically lists a stretch as a football move.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News