AR Optics

Nikon P 223 3x32 150
Trijicon ACOG 4x32 1300

The glass on the Nikon is more than enough for what you'd use a mid-range optic for. I have one that goes on mine and at 200 yards it's as accurate as I could ask for. I can't see spending 1000 more dollars on something when the cheaper version can hit 6 inch plates in rapid succession at 200 every time.

I prefer a 1-4x scope for most ar setups, but can't go wrong with those either.

It's hard for me to justify spending 1200$ on optics. ACOGs are the shite though

MBUS

I have a burris 1x4 MTAC on my 6.8 great glass nice clean reticle

it was very clean. Had illuminated reticle as well.

i like my night force 1-4 nxs if no budget is the case.

quote:

---

and still give you the ability to shoot out to 200yds.

---

That's a really strong assertion. I find that the average person would have a tough time connecting at even 100 yards with a red dot. Maybe something as large as a pig but at 200 yards it's considerably smaller.

For the OP, if I had two guns that already had un-magnified (1x) red dots (your two EOtechs) I would opt for a low power scope. Personally, I like 2-7x scopes for the true extended range of using magnification.

EDIT: But I'll add that the Aimpoint PRO is pretty sweet. I have one on my ACR.

If I had the money I'd get an ACOG. Carried one for two deployments and loved it. If I were to choose the model it would be the 4x32 ACOG/RMR combo. Best of both worlds - 4x amplification with mil drop and a red dot on top for reflexive fire.

ACOG/RMR combo

quote:

---

Can't go wrong with any Aimpoint optic.

---

Agreed. Great bang for the buck.