- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What's your take on prescription drug laws?
Posted on 12/24/14 at 10:54 pm to the808bass
Posted on 12/24/14 at 10:54 pm to the808bass
I agree with everything IB has said.
Also, when it comes to things like painkillers and ADD meds (my gf actually needs them and gets treated like a criminal trying to get her refills), this may sound heartless but I really don't care if people abuse them and die. That's their problem, and shouldn't inconvenience people the drugs would actually help.
Also, when it comes to things like painkillers and ADD meds (my gf actually needs them and gets treated like a criminal trying to get her refills), this may sound heartless but I really don't care if people abuse them and die. That's their problem, and shouldn't inconvenience people the drugs would actually help.
Posted on 12/24/14 at 11:10 pm to TigersforEver
Do you ever think about the fact that all these people who are abusing pills are making it harder for the ones who need it to actually get it. Every Norco script I get and the patient has never been to me before, I am looking them up on the board. Its wasting my time as a pharmacist to look half of these abusers up only to see they just had it filled at another store. Makes me resentful. Pharmacist did not go to 6 yrs of school to be legal drug pushers. But thats where we are in this industry and its only getting alot worse.
Posted on 12/24/14 at 11:21 pm to tigerbait3488
quote:
Do you ever think about the fact that all these people who are abusing pills are making it harder for the ones who need it to actually get it. Every Norco script I get and the patient has never been to me before, I am looking them up on the board. Its wasting my time as a pharmacist to look half of these abusers up only to see they just had it filled at another store. Makes me resentful. Pharmacist did not go to 6 yrs of school to be legal drug pushers. But thats where we are in this industry and its only getting alot worse.
So wouldn't you rather not have to worry about screening, and what people do with it is purely their business?
Posted on 12/24/14 at 11:29 pm to TigersforEver
Impossible. DEA and the state board would shut us down. I am just glad we have some monitoring. About 3-4 yrs ago, we had zero monitoring and had no idea what their history was. I had a guy today come in and tried to give me a story that he was early on his Norco script bc the pharmacist at the store he was getting it filled was stealing it. Junkie trying to get his xmas eve high.
This post was edited on 12/24/14 at 11:30 pm
Posted on 12/24/14 at 11:32 pm to tigerbait3488
Just think about all these people (and they are ALOT) on the road and driving on the same roads as you on this stuff. Scary.
Posted on 12/24/14 at 11:39 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Most people don't understand the difference between viral and bacterial infections and the ones who do often fail to take their rx antibiotics as they should. It only takes a small percentage of dumbshits to pave the way for the next epidemic
Posted on 12/25/14 at 1:28 am to I B Freeman
I read this entire thread. Your perspective is more persuasive and based in both fact and common sense. I declare you the victor.
Posted on 12/25/14 at 9:28 pm to Dick Leverage
quote:
DEA
Shouldn't exist. Along with the EPA, DOTD, IRS, HUD, and so many more
ETA: how could I forget the ATF?!
This post was edited on 12/25/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 12/25/14 at 11:56 pm to I B Freeman
quote:I'm literally agape at the terrible logic of this argument. "Not all bugs are superbugs yet, therefore superbugs aren't a danger."
Penicillin was discovered in 1928 and it is still effective against a lot of bugs today. So much for the dangers of super bugs.
And if you or anyone else want to accuse that of being a straw man I want you to explain how the first sentence in this "argument" could possibly be interpreted differently. Because the obvious implication is that until an antibiotic is totally ineffective against all bacteria, everywhere, you won't be convinced.
Which shows you don't understand mutation, epidemiology, or literally anything being discussed ITT
Like, the majority of staph isolated since the 1960s have produced penicillinase. Gonorrhea since the 1980s. Strep is mostly there now. But clearly since we can still use good old Penicillin V against shite like anthrax (which isn't prevalent enough to have ubiquitous resistance yet) this is all bullshite right?
This post was edited on 12/26/14 at 12:14 am
Posted on 12/26/14 at 12:19 am to Iosh
penicillin has such a narrow spectrum right now from mutations that we only use it for really specific infections or after cultures are back.
dude needs to stick to tax credits
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News