Started By
Message
locked post

Saudi/OPEC End Game

Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:07 pm
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48837 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:07 pm
If you were a mass exporter of a finite product I.E. Saudi's and their oil, wouldn't you rather sell half as much oil for 100 dollars a barrel than twice as much for say 60 dollars a barrel? I mean you are depleting your stock and only making a net revenue income gain of 10% give or take.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23136 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:08 pm to
Long-term play to Crush fracking
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48837 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Long-term play to Crush fracking


Sure but for how long? another 5 years?
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:09 pm to
They're trying to make fracking and oil sands uneconomical to cause their competition in North America to sweat and possibly give up the ghost. That's my theory. It's total desperation on their part. Literally their entire civilization possible only because of oil revenue. lol at them.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48837 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Literally their entire civilization possible only because of oil revenue. lol at them.


North American Producers have trillions tied up in the Bakken, Wolf Camp, Eagle Ford etc. lol they have creditors and junk bonds out the arse, they aren't gonna walk away from it all and fold up shop. They will sale at break even or less to stay out of insolvency.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:12 pm to
I have a question when it comes to fracking: how economical are operations compared to development? A slight dip in prices might be enough to make companies sit on a lot of tight oil fields that haven't been developed yet, but if there's already a supply glut, wouldn't they also have to wait out the supply that's already developed?
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 12:13 pm
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48837 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

how economical are operations compared to development?


The upfront costs are the major concern, they've gotta produce now to stay ahead of the credit monster, they can't not sell.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64146 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:13 pm to
But its still in the ground and as time goes by I would think the tech to get it out gets cheaper.

Edit
Ah. I can see from a current investors standpoint.
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 12:15 pm
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16706 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

If you were a mass exporter of a finite product I.E. Saudi's and their oil, wouldn't you rather sell half as much oil for 100 dollars a barrel than twice as much for say 60 dollars a barrel


They are staying in the game to maintain market share. Last time this happened they didnt, and it cost them over the long haul so theyre making a difference decision this time.
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 12:18 pm
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25909 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:21 pm to
Don't forget the loss of the war machine and its insatiable appetite to gobble up gasoline/oil supplies in Afghanistan & Iraq.

Then you have the destabilization of Iraq and Syria with their rock bottom oil/gas prices they are putting into the open market.
Posted by lsuroadie
South LA
Member since Oct 2007
8392 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Long-term play to Crush shale
Posted by papasmurf1269
Hells Pass
Member since Apr 2005
20883 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Long-term play to Crush fracking
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27291 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Don't forget the loss of the war machine and its insatiable appetite to gobble up gasoline/oil supplies in Afghanistan & Iraq.


Hope to God this is sarcasm of some type.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48837 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Long-term play to Crush fracking


So the Saudis are going to start importing natural gas too? The majority of shale booms are gas driven at this point, Marcellus, Haynesville, Barnett, Eagleford (50/50) The only real shale oil booms are the Wolfcamp and Bakken, and the Wolfcamp has very good gas production as well. The oil/gas price ratio disparity is as good as it's been in years when you are looking at BOEPD.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51461 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Strannix


The Saudis are playing "Who Has the Deepest Pockets". They believe they can produce enough at low prices for long enough to crush the fracking industry. What they don't realize is that with the technology already well-developed, once they raise prices again it will be little effort for fracking to get back under way.

So right now all we have to do is sit back and enjoy the low-priced oil (and the resulting lowered prices at the gas pumps) while sitting on reserves we've found but haven't really tapped yet. Once their reserves run out, what do they have? They have sand, heat, militants, rugs and camels. Without oil, the Middle East will eventually (over generations as the easy money slowly peters out) go back to being mainly a Stone Age-era land that appeals mainly to archaeologists.

Meanwhile we have lumber, we have minerals, we have oil, we have natural gas, we have fishing, we have manufacturing, we have high technology. We have so many things they have to import or will have to import once the oil dries up (which may not happen in our lifetime, but it will happen).

My guess is they will play this game for a year or so, two at most, then increase their prices once they realize that crushing the American fracking groups isn't as easy as they thought.
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 12:36 pm
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Long-term play to Crush fracking


It's tempting to think we are their targets, but that doesn't make as much sense as Iran and Russia being the targets.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51461 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

It's tempting to think we are their targets, but that doesn't make as much sense as Iran and Russia being the targets.


I don't doubt for a single second Iran and Russia are targets. I don't even doubt they are primary targets (especially the Iranians, since rumor has it that current US/UN negotiations might soon lead to easing oil restrictions on them), but don't think they aren't looking at our increasing energy independence as an issue to tackle.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

If you were a mass exporter of a finite product I.E. Saudi's and their oil, wouldn't you rather sell half as much oil for 100 dollars a barrel than twice as much for say 60 dollars a barrel? I mean you are depleting your stock and only making a net revenue income gain of 10% give or take.



Don't want to lose market share so they cut price in order to dry up the excess supply has turned out to be the shale barrel. They're hoping prices are back in the $85 range come the end of next year. People will list any mountain of additional reasons from Syria to Russia to Iran (and laughably ISIS), but it's really quite simple.

The pain train is coming for the US independents. I think one big problem I've seen over the last few years is that Wall Street became so fixated on repeatable resource plays that public companies first then nearly every PE backed since became a single, pure play player. So you have all these companies that are Bakken, Eagle Ford or Permian only....all their eggs in one basket, borrowing like crazy to keep the rigs running banking everything at $80+. Now sub $60s are here and they are fricked.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48837 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Now sub $60s are here and they are fricked.


Oh no doubt, especially guys like Halcon and some of your smaller Eagleford players, SM has taken a huge hit too.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Halcon


They were fricked before, now they just fricked X10.

And the story is simple, it has nothing to do with international politics and everything to do with simple economics. The Saudis just want to force others to cut supply (not them again) and push the price back up to the $80s.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram