Started By
Message
locked post

Glacial melt has tripled in the Amundsen Sea

Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:45 am
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:45 am
quote:

WASHINGTON: The fastest-melting region of Antarctica is losing the equivalent weight in ice of Mount Everest every two years, with the melt rate of glaciers in the region tripling during the last decade, a new study has found.

The glaciers in the Amundsen Sea Embayment in West Antarctica are hemorrhaging ice faster than any other part of Antarctica and are the most significant Antarctic contributors to sea level rise, researchers said.

Read more at:

LINK
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101264 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:47 am to
quote:

The glaciers in the Amundsen Sea Embayment in West Antarctica are hemorrhaging ice faster than any other part of Antarctica and are the most significant Antarctic contributors to sea level rise, researchers said.



So, this is a localized problem?
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:49 am to
Ok so what do you want a politician to do about it? How much should you pay to stop it?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35883 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:49 am to
quote:

So, this is a localized problem?


Melting is a global problem. Increased ice pack is a local issue.

Physics 101
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:49 am to
I thought religious threads were frowned upon on the board.
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:51 am to
Didn't AleGore, the inventor of the internet, tell us that all the glaciers would be completely melted by 2013?

And, how could he be wrong. After all, he did invent the internet!
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45793 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:54 am to
Aren't CO2 levels much lower on the southern hemisphere than the northern due to much less human activity on the Southern end? What is causing this? How much have the temps risen to melt all this ice?
Posted by Road Tiger
SW Landmass
Member since Oct 2014
834 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:54 am to
I read like 2 weeks ago that Antarctic ice was thickening up. Wow must've been quite the heat wave come through.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126940 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Didn't AleGore, the inventor of the internet, tell us that all the glaciers would be completely melted by 2013?
No, he said all of the Arctic (North Pole) sea ice would melt and be gone by 2014. Instead the Arctic sea ice is at a 10 year high now. See GumboPot's other thread on this board about that.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:58 am to
Maybe it's got something to do with the volcanos?

quote:

Scientists use computer models to try to predict the future of the ice sheet, but their lack of understanding of subglacial geothermal energy has been a glaring gap in these models. Measuring geothermal activity under the ice sheet is so difficult that researchers usually just enter one, uniform estimate for the contributions of geothermal heat to melting, Schroeder said.


quote:

"It's the most complex thermal environment you might imagine," study co-author Don Blankenship, a geophysicist at UT Austin, said in a statement. "And then, you plop the most critical dynamically unstable ice sheet on planet Earth in the middle of this thing, and then you try to model it. It's virtually impossible."


Measure with a micrometer, mark with a crayon, and cut with an axe. Keep plenty of decimal places to make it appear accurate.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40087 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:00 am to
So glaciers have never melted before?
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101264 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

quote:
Scientists use computer models to try to predict the future of the ice sheet, but their lack of understanding of subglacial geothermal energy has been a glaring gap in these models. Measuring geothermal activity under the ice sheet is so difficult that researchers usually just enter one, uniform estimate for the contributions of geothermal heat to melting, Schroeder said.


quote:
"It's the most complex thermal environment you might imagine," study co-author Don Blankenship, a geophysicist at UT Austin, said in a statement. "And then, you plop the most critical dynamically unstable ice sheet on planet Earth in the middle of this thing, and then you try to model it. It's virtually impossible."



So, there may actually be more to my question than just as a rhetorical quip?
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:04 am to
quote:

So, there may actually be more to my question than just as a rhetorical quip?


I would guess so unless you're a location denier.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:18 am to
Soooo, is my F250 contributing to the melt or does it have nothing to do with the ice growth?

Someone please clear this up for me. TIA.
Posted by LigerFan
Member since Jan 2014
2711 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:24 am to
quote:

SpidermanTUba


Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57090 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Measuring geothermal activity under the ice sheet is so difficult that researchers usually just enter one, uniform estimate for the contributions of geothermal heat to melting, Schroeder said.
Classic! "We can't model it, so... we'll just throw something in there, that delivers the favored result, so at defense we can say 'we considered that in modeled that in our model'".
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

that delivers the favored result


That's science being restored to its proper place.

All that melting water has got to be raising sea level. Has Barry read about that in the newspaper yet?
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:54 am to
GOOD!!

I am Anti-Glacier and hope they all die a watery, slightly less than freezing temperature death.


Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Classic! "We can't model it, so... we'll just throw something in there, that delivers the favored result, so at defense we can say 'we considered that in modeled that in our model'".



Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:56 am to
anti-glacite
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram