Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Oregon - Liberal mecca. Denied...

Posted on 11/20/14 at 6:41 am
Posted by gatorrocks
Lake Mary, FL
Member since Oct 2007
13969 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 6:41 am
Illegals Drivers Licenses

Tread lightly Mr. President.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40062 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 6:41 am to
but are their inspection stickers out of date?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54201 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 6:47 am to
quote:

The ballot initiative known as Measure 88 would have given four-year driver’s licenses to undocumented immigrants “without requiring proof of legal presence in the United States” and died with a vote of 68 -33 percent.



quote:

Mr. President.


Sir, here is what the American people want, since you're so into governing by fiat claiming that this is what the people want. Either that or you're a pathological liar.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 6:55 am to
quote:

“without requiring proof of legal presence in the United States”




quote:

Mr. President.


quote:

here is what the American people want


To be fair, wouldn't the President's EO accomplish this? I thought the very idea was to grant "legal presence" for the 4 million in question.


I'm not pro this EO. But, it seems that the Oregon outcome is reasonable and the EO would grant SOME of the subject folks the very 'legal presence' that is important to the initiative.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32757 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:04 am to
This news is kind of old from a politics standpoint but I have thought about it a. It since the election.

I'm not sure I wouldn't support illegal immigrants getting a driver's license as long as it could be used for driving only. We have a lot of illegals driving in TX and the uninsured risk is real. I would like it to say "Not A Citizen" in huge red letters across the top and make it illegal to be used for using or obtaining any citizen rights.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54201 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:07 am to
quote:

I thought the very idea was to grant "legal presence" for the 4 million in question.


Maybe, I don't really know. Is there already not a legal path for those 4 million to take to obtain "presence" already? I thought this is a measure to get rid of lap two and three and go straight to four in order to get that mile run in.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32063 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:10 am to
Areas outside of the Williamette valley in Oregon are very conservative.
Posted by gatorrocks
Lake Mary, FL
Member since Oct 2007
13969 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:12 am to
quote:

Areas outside of the Williamette valley in Oregon are very conservative.


Both senators and 4 out of 5 representatives are democrats.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54201 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:15 am to
quote:

I would like it to say "Not A Citizen" in huge red letters across the top and make it illegal to be used for using or obtaining any citizen rights.


I could go for this as long as an illegal knows the English language. I'd think reading road signs is imperative when driving.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32063 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:19 am to
quote:

Both senators and 4 out of 5 representatives are democrats.



That's because the liberal Willamette Valley is the most populated part of the state.
Posted by gatorrocks
Lake Mary, FL
Member since Oct 2007
13969 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:21 am to
quote:

That's because the liberal Willamette Valley is the most populated part of the state.


Come on now... Is it 7/8 of the population?
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32757 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:31 am to
quote:

could go for this as long as an illegal knows the English language. I'd think reading road signs is imperative when driving.



Well, I think they should have to pass the drivers test so that would likely be part of it.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32063 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Come on now... Is it 7/8 of the population?



Portland, Salem, Corvallis, Eugene.....the valley is bulk of the electorate.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Areas outside of the Williamette valley in Oregon are very conservative.
true. East of the Cascades is definitely more conservative but 90% of the population lives on the western side.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89453 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:42 am to
quote:

I thought the very idea was to grant "legal presence" for the 4 million in question.


This is where the Constitutional crisis comes in - BHP - not deporting them because you determine you can't is an executive decision based on resources:

"Okay - we don't deport unless they commit a crime."

But saying they're here "legally" when the statutes in place say they're not is rewriting the law.

That is what comes down when he gives them identification, entitlements, SSNs, etc.

That is the $hitstorm that is coming.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:43 am to
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 7:57 am to
quote:

This is where the Constitutional crisis comes in - BHP -


I said I was NOT "pro" this EO.

I was just pointing out that this Oregon result is not counter to the president's stated aim.
Posted by gatorrocks
Lake Mary, FL
Member since Oct 2007
13969 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 8:16 am to
quote:

East of the Cascades is definitely more conservative but 90% of the population lives on the western side.


Right. So even in with MOST POPULATED part of the state being liberal, it didn't pass. If 90% lives in the liberal parts of the state, how did this not pass?

This wasn't an electoral style vote. It was a popular vote.

Surely a ton of liberals saw the stupidity of passing this law.
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49486 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 8:22 am to
I like that the example ID is for the whitest guy ever. They have a lot of illegal Canadians sneaking into Oregon?
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32063 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Right. So even in with MOST POPULATED part of the state being liberal, it didn't pass. If 90% lives in the liberal parts of the state, how did this not pass?


My theory:
1. 90% of the people live in a liberal part of the state, but far fewer than 90% of the state is liberal- especially on immigration.

2. Growing Hispanic population in the Willamette Valley along the liberal I-5 corridor, which is basically a bastion of "caucasasianaity"(I made up that word) and liberalism has raised awareness on the issues of illegal immigration....thus tying liberals there to reality.

3. Most conservatives and a significant number of liberals don't support it. This would never be popular in Bend or the conservative eastern part of the state even though they are least impacted.

quote:

Surely a ton of liberals saw the stupidity of passing this law.


That's exactly what happened. A critical number of them very clearly saw the problem. As I've said, the I-5 corridor has seen a boom in the Latino population over the past 20 years and people there are actually cognizant of the problems illegal immigration can cause. Liberal or conservative, they have exposure to problems with illegal immigrants and are thus tied to the reality of it.
This post was edited on 11/20/14 at 10:38 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram