Started By
Message

Denard Robinson or Rashad Jennings ROS?

Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:09 am
Posted by man117
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2009
674 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:09 am
Someone just dropped Rashad due to bye week crunch. Not really familiar with MCL sprains and don't really plan on playing either since I have LeVeon, Murray, McCoy, and J. Hill. I like to fill out my roster though. Should I drop Denard for Rashad?
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 11:10 am
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31059 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:15 am to
I would take Jennings over Jeremy Hill.
Posted by lsufornc3
Member since Dec 2011
275 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:17 am to
Robinson is coming from back to back 100yd games rushing with 5.8 and 6.0 yds per carry and Jennings had one big game against Houston before he got injured. Stick with Robinson and see how it goes.
Posted by man117
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2009
674 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:18 am to
quote:

I would take Jennings over Jeremy Hill.




I drafted him and have been holding him since he had good production inn a limited roll. I thought he would explode if Gio went down. Last couple weeks, I have been considering him expendable and then Gio gets injured so IDK what to think about him?
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31059 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:21 am to
Jennings is the starter. Hill is a usable handcuff with big potential. If Gio goes down, then Hill could produce at a pre-Jennings injury level. Why not take the guy that will already be the bellcow?

I think it is pretty obvious.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17084 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:24 am to
Don't want no dang Jagewars on ma fantasy team.
Posted by man117
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2009
674 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Robinson is coming from back to back 100yd games rushing with 5.8 and 6.0 yds per carry and Jennings had one big game against Houston before he got injured. Stick with Robinson and see how it goes.



I love his numbers so far. He gets chunk plays and seems explosive. My issues are the jags offense is a dumpster fire and they don't score td's so not much goaline work. They don't pass it to him while Jennings gets a lot of targets. Just not sure how much the jags believe in him even though he's been much more productive than the rest of their backs. He had 90 at half and only got 7 more touches since they fell behind.
Posted by beaver
The 755 Club
Member since Sep 2009
46861 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:25 am to


It's Jennings dude

Jennings should not be available on the wire even in a bye week crunch
Posted by man117
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2009
674 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Jennings is the starter. Hill is a usable handcuff with big potential. If Gio goes down, then Hill could produce at a pre-Jennings injury level. Why not take the guy that will already be the bellcow?

I think it is pretty obvious.



I just looked the numbers and usage and checked on Gio's injury again. You're right, I dropped Hill for Jennings. Thanks for the advice
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:50 am to
Jennings gets his starting job back next week as andre Williams has sucked absolute balls. (I don't know why hillis hasn't started over him)

Jennings is 29, he's not the future and the giants aren't going anywhere unless they start winning a lot of games...Jennings is going to be fed often
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71934 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:51 am to
so you dropped Hill instead of Denard?

quote:

I think it is pretty obvious.


lulz

gtfo dude
Posted by man117
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2009
674 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

so you dropped Hill instead of Denard?


Yeah, now all 5 of my rb's are starters. If Gio went down for an extended period of time, I should be able to get Hill back as long as no one has him rostered. I'm number 2 on the waiver wire.
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 11:56 am
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71934 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:59 am to
Well that's nice i guess

but with those RBs you have you were better off just holding Hill
Posted by man117
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2009
674 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Well that's nice i guess

but with those RBs you have you were better off just holding Hill




I like Hill a lot, but I think I can get him back if needed. If McCoy ramps it up after he gets some more lineman back none of these backups will ever play. Only other issues are to see where Gordon is when he returns and maybe try to package some rb's and Kelce to upgrade my TE spot since Andy Reid won't unleash him.
Posted by Ooh Wee Ooh
Member since Nov 2008
1452 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

I just looked the numbers and usage and checked on Gio's injury again. You're right, I dropped Hill for Jennings.
His status was from Monday. New status today: Gio didn't practice
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
36895 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Jennings should not be available on the wire even in a bye week crunch


Someone actually just dropped him today in my big league. I was coming here expecting some sort of announcement like he's done for the season. Now I need to figure out who to drop for him.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram