Started By
Message

re: British gov't promises to do anything it can to get an NFL team in London

Posted on 10/23/14 at 5:23 am to
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54595 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 5:23 am to
4 pages and nobody sees the forest for all those damn trees in the way

If british government is on board :

#1 Tata Motors owns the Jaguar brand and the company is headquartered in England so you have a built in brand and a name that keeps the Jacksonville Brand in place.

#2 Tata also owns the Land Rover brand which are some pretty sweet high end vehicles as well. Players could have free use of Jags and Rovers while playing overseas. Would certainly be a nice perk

#3 Just as Canadian hockey players play for US teams, so could US players play in Europe

#4 Jaguar has royal warrants with the royal family. This may not be a big deal here, but it is there

#5 If the government says it will do anything, it would not surprise me if special tax relief provisions are crated to deal with tax issues for americans playing / living part time in England

#6 Having a built in corporate tie in from day one should appeal to the NFL and the owners as it could mean the same for co marketing not seen since the Steelers were a 24 / 7/ 365 advertisement for US Steel.

The past



The future?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110490 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 6:54 am to
quote:

What player would sign for a team that has to make a transatlantic flight 8 times a season
1. It wouldn't be 8 times.

2. What players want to sign to play in the city of Jacksonville? Not many
Posted by iliveinabox
in a box
Member since Aug 2011
24115 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:25 am to
I can dig it
Posted by tccdc
Washington, DC
Member since Sep 2007
3565 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Congress needs to do whatever it takes to get a Premiere League team in America.


No...
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71294 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 8:10 am to
First thing they would need to do is massively change their taxing laws.
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27226 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 8:24 am to
This is bullshite. As a huge follower of the Barclays Premier League, I would hate for there to be an American team.
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 10:51 am
Posted by gatorrocks
Lake Mary, FL
Member since Oct 2007
13969 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 8:25 am to
The only problem I have with this is the travel for west coast teams.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25325 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:08 am to
quote:

The only problem I have with this is the travel for west coast teams.



How often does Seattle play Miami?

The time difference is a bigger issue. 7 hour difference between London and the west coast.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110490 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:40 am to
quote:

it's going to happen whether y'all like it or not
I never really understood why fans are so against it.

I mean, you don't have to think it's the greatest idea or be all about it, but I think it would really interesting, like it or not.

If it works, great. If it fails, cool we get to bash Goodell or whoever the commish is for the collosal failure. Win win.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110490 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Their soccer teams don't seem to have trouble attracting international talent with mega salaries. Anyone know how that works?
The NFL team would have the competition of 31 other AMerican NFL teams.

If you're an American in soccer good enough to play overseas and get paid, there's not as much competition from MLS in terms of the pay and the quality of the league.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110490 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:09 am to
quote:

First thing they would need to do is massively change their taxing laws
Or change em just for NFL players on that team, they did promise to do anything to get the team.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31060 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:15 am to
Why I am against it? Well, it does not make sense to have a team that far away.

It is a massive competitive disadvantage. I would bet the house that the London team would absolutely blow every season unless they landed an Andrew Luck type.

The London team would have to be operated under a much higher salary cap because of the significant differences in the tax rates. I have no issues with how England taxes its citizens, but the players would not want to go from a 37% tax rate to whatever it is in England. You would have to adjust that team's salary cap.

My big issue was work permits, but it appears that England wants to work with the NFL on that.

There are just so many hurdles that have to be overcome. As of now, the NFL has a perfec nimble of teams and the perfect set-up for divisions. It is just a terrible idea all around. It will make the league unbalanced.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31060 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:17 am to
False. If you are an American star, then you will get more in the MLS. Michael Bradley is making $6 million a year for Toronto FC in the MLS. I believe he was making between $2 and $3 million at AS Roma (in Rome).
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110490 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

False. If you are an American star, then you will get more in the MLS. Michael Bradley is making $6 million a year for Toronto FC in the MLS. I believe he was making between $2 and $3 million at AS Roma (in Rome).
Word, never woulda guessed that, that's what I get for assuming lol.

I also did mention the quality of competition though, i think that point stands.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
66975 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

There are just so many hurdles that have to be overcome. As of now, the NFL has a perfec nimble of teams and the perfect set-up for divisions. It is just a terrible idea all around. It will make the league unbalanced.



If they really wanted to make it work, there would be an entire division of 4 teams in Europe (say Barcelona, London, Paris, and Munich, for example). That would cut the number of transatlantic flights down per team tremendously. They then also make it a rule that no American team has to play 2 Europe teams in Europe in the same regular season. Their preseason games can all be against one-another.

It could work, but it would mean 4 cities losing NFL franchises, unless they somehow add teams.

Imagine a league with 2 conferences with 6 divisions of 4 teams each. You eliminate the 1st round bye and you still get 2 wild card teams in the playoffs.

Basically, the NFL ends up with 48 teams playing for 16 playoff spots instead of 32 teams playing for 12 spots.

That way, the teams could shape up like so:
New division in Europe (Jags go East)
New teams in San Antonio, Las Vegas, Vancouver, Mexico City, and 1 team in either Montreal, Ottowa, or Quebec.
Bills go north to Toronto
Raiders or rams go to LA


It could work.
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31060 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:49 am to
Of course, the quality of competition is better in top European leagues. The Premier League in Great Britain is arguably the most desirable to play in the world. The NFL does not have this type of competition, so it is not really comparable.
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
16883 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 11:13 am to
An NFL team in London is happening.

It IS happening, whether people like it or not.

And they will have NO PROBLEM getting players to go there.

If you were a young single multi-millionaire athlete, where you rather be- some shithole city like Green Bay or Buffalo, or LONDON???
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66874 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 11:19 am to
I think parliament will give the players some sort of tax exemption to help grease the wheel. The tax rate there is silly.
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 12:02 pm to
Tax...

You have be domiciled in the UK or you don't pay UK income tax, I'm not sure an NFL team would be if they only played 8 weeks a year. I think it has to be over 100 days spend in the country and earning a wage. But let's assume the players do pay UK tax rates.

Here's the breakdown

The tax is 40% over $50k and 45% over $200k (approx). There are marginal rates between $15k and 50k. How does that compare to living in California?

Fed income tax is 33% over 189k for a single person. There's also 2.2% income tax in California. And that rises to 40% over $406k. So Frank Gore pays 40- 42.2% tax on most of his earnings. In the UK he'd pay 45%, hardly a back breaker.

what does that extra 2% get you? Well it gets you free comprehensive health insurance. No deductible, no out of pocket bullshite maximum to hit. All facilities are in network. All prescribed drugs are prior authorized and cost no more than approx $10. All museums are free, which is a pretty big deal in London. Presumably the NFL would compensate the London based players the amount it costs to provide their american counterparts with insurance...
Posted by JoeMoTiger
KC Area
Member since Nov 2013
2677 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 12:20 pm to
If this happens the NFL needs to tap into those behemoths in Norway, Holland, Finland, etc. if you watch the World Strongest Man competition there's some big sonsabitches up in Scandinavia land, can you imagine a NFL line of those. muthas
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram