Started By
Message
locked post

States needed by Dems to hold Senate

Posted on 10/20/14 at 8:17 am
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 8:17 am
Start both at 45 States 10 Tossups *** Bold are Best Chances
Democrats (Need 5)

Arkansas - Mark Pryor (D)
Alaska - Begich (D)
Colorado - Udall (D)
Georgia - Open
Iowa - Open
Kansas - Roberts (R)
Kentucky - McConnell (R)
Louisiana - Landrieu (D)
New Hampshire - Shaheen (D)
North Carolina - Hagen (D)




This post was edited on 10/20/14 at 8:18 am
Posted by purpngold
Member since Jun 2006
1761 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 8:40 am to
Nate Silver says GOP has 62% chance of winning majority with 52 seats as the most likely scenario and 53 seats as the second most likely scenario.

LINK
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32640 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Nate Silver says GOP has 62% chance of winning majority with 52 seats as the most likely scenario and 53 seats as the second most likely scenario.


Nate Silver knows his shite
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56001 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:10 am to
yeah I think the GOP gets the senate back. This would be a very good thing hopefully Obama can make some compromises.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105375 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:12 am to
quote:

hopefully Obama can make some compromises.




No, he will get a bigger pen and phone.
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37133 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:57 am to
No way. In fact, I wonder if the Dems hope the GOP take the Senate. That way they can demonize them for 2 years to rile up the base for 16, hoping to hold Pres and take Senate again.

Obama and the Dems know they have the press, so they will continue the public thrashing of R's through the media. More D turnout in 16 is their focus.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:01 am to
I'm just wanting the Reps to win because then Obama will not be able to use the "do-nothing" Congress as an excuse anymore. The shoe will be on his foot. Will be interesting to see how the press spins the do-nothing president.
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32640 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:03 am to
quote:

I'm just wanting the Reps to win because then Obama will not be able to use the "do-nothing" Congress as an excuse anymore. The shoe will be on his foot. Will be interesting to see how the press spins the do-nothing president.


He's going to veto anything they pass and he will do exactly that. Blame the "do nothing" congress that won't help the economy, won't help women get equal pay, won't put in place common sense gun safety measures in place. You know, his same old bullshite.

And guess what? The MSM is going to carry that water full throated going into 2016.
Posted by nycajun
Nothin' could be finer.....
Member since Dec 2004
18183 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Nate Silver says GOP has 62% chance of winning majority with 52 seats as the most likely scenario and 53 seats as the second most likely scenario.



The Iowa Electronic Markets (as valid a predictor as there has been over the last 20 years or so) currently put the Republicans at just under 92% likelihood to take control. See the 3rd graphic near bottom of page
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 11:40 am to
quote:

In fact, I wonder if the Dems hope the GOP take the Senate. That way they can demonize them for 2 years to rile up the base for 16, hoping to hold Pres and take Senate again.

they don't. they want to hang onto the senate. no one wants to lose power. Obama may want it, but he is not the democrats. I can see Hillary wanting it.

But the DNC? Average Democrat on the street? No fricking way
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 11:49 am to
Have to admit, I don't really care and it isn't going to make Amy difference which party controls the Senate.

Nothing is going to change either way.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51222 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 11:49 am to
Nunn has a pretty good shot at taking Georgia's seat. That'd be a flip.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118566 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Nunn has a pretty good shot at taking Georgia's seat. That'd be a flip.


That would be hard to believe.
Posted by purpngold
Member since Jun 2006
1761 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 12:40 pm to
Ginsburg will most likely be replaced before the next Pres. takes office. Control of the Senate will be paramount in this and all other judicial appointees.
Posted by TN_Tigers
West Tennessee
Member since Feb 2013
7193 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Nunn has a pretty good shot at taking Georgia's seat. That'd be a flip.


Georgia is looking iffy for the GOP the last couple of weeks.

They are already 32k over their early vote for 2010.

% of white early vote down 4.1%
7.6% of early vote is new registration(aka Nunn voter)

Best hope for Perdue is a win in the runoff.
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
13058 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 1:52 pm to
Obnoxious Rightwing crap is not gonna reach Obama's desk even if the Repubs take over the Senate. That crap will be filibustered to death.
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32640 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Obnoxious Rightwing crap


like?
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 2:33 pm to
I'm guessing you know these numbers because you are following it closely, but for other readers, the latest poll on the GA Senate race was conducted October 13 & 14 with 1543 likely voters as the respondent pool.

Nunn - 45.69%

Perdue - 44.72%

Libertarian Amanda Swafford - 6.03%

Undecided - 3.56%

I predicted in another thread that Swafford would come in at 3% on Election day. If that happens, Nunn would need 66% of the remaining Swafford polling group and the Undecideds group to win outright.

With a whopping 63 days between the November election and a Jan. runoff election, the amount of $$$ spent on that campaign would be jawdropping if the GOP holds a 50-49 lead after the Louisiana runoff.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81220 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 2:36 pm to
Are Republicans really getting excited about this? It is a mere 2 year "victory" and then it will be more Dem than ever.

Obama has pretty much made himself a lame duck for the rest of his term anyway so I don't see the huge deal.

I guess common sense dictates that you need to grab as many as you can, but the sense of jubilation I hear seems misguided. There will certainly be a safely Dem Senate seated in January 2017 for whomever the new President is.
This post was edited on 10/20/14 at 2:38 pm
Posted by TN_Tigers
West Tennessee
Member since Feb 2013
7193 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

I'm guessing you know these numbers because you are following it closely



Yeah I'm tracking them closely but it is kind of playing with fire. You have to know trends of each state and even then its an educated guess.

In Georgia you can vote early in person or mail. It seems like its about 75/25 in favor of in person so far. Whites are voting more by mail and blacks in person(no party reg ballots for GA so all I go off of is race)

Dems are going after new registrants whereas the GOP is trying to mobilize GOP vote. So the white vote is down and new registrant is up(most likely black) this race is definitely trending Dem.




first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram