Started By
Message

unfair trade

Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:38 pm
Posted by petar
Miami
Member since May 2009
5989 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:38 pm
Is this trade unfair/ should be vetoed..

Team A gives
Lacy
Forsett

Team B gives
Allen
Forte
McKinnon

Team B is a game or two from eliminated from playoff spot.

I think Team A "wins" the trade but dont think it really should be vetoed.

What y'all think?
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25428 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:43 pm to
that's pretty crappy for team B
Wouldnt' call it unfair, just stupid on team B.
I personally wouldn't have traded Forte for all of the other 4 players combined.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77405 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by forksup
Member since Dec 2013
8817 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:44 pm to
Team A does win. Why would Team B giving away Forte for Lacy and Forsett if he's trying to stay in contention? Didn't Forte score as much as both of them combined last week?
Posted by petar
Miami
Member since May 2009
5989 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:49 pm to
Sorry Rondo, didn't know there was such a high bar to start threads...
Had a question, figured this would be a good place to ask it.

But yea Forte is the clear best here. Team B needs another rb and maybe he feels Forsett and Lacy is better moving forward than Forte and McKinnon.

My thing is I doubt this league conversation would be had if both teams were in clear contention. So its hard for me to veto almost solely on a team being out of contention
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
26975 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:31 pm to
Not close to a veto.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram