Grades for this team at the halfway point

Special teams C-
Pk missing 2 PAT's should be B+ even with 50 yard winner.

Your Dline grade is too generous. Whisky, MSU, and AU have had canyons to run through. There has been no pass rush from the front 4.

LSU really needs Hunter to stay one more year. Right now, starting Clark and Teheuma at DE would not be comfortable.

QB - D-
RB - A- (Fournette is going to be a beast)
FB - B
WR - A (Dural and Dupree are the real deal)
TE - F (should probably be tied into OL since they don't catch the ball)
OL - C+ ( seems to be improving)
DL - F
LB - D-
DB - B+
ST - C

Coaching - F -----------------

quote:

---

TE - D blocking adequate, lack of targets but it still is the one area that could help the QB with completion percentage and open up the offense even if it is minimal targets, nice to see Desean Smith streaking down the field on that long 3rd down conversion against FLa and he was open as well

---

Should be an F. They get called for penalties constantly, they can't catch, and they've missed way too many blocks.

QB - F If this isn't an F then I don't think I've ever seen one. We're more inept at passing right now than when we had JJ/Lee. If Dupre hadn't bailed Harris out on snagging that underthrown pass, he seriously would not have had a pass across the line of scrimmage completed. And we think he's hands down better than Jennings.

WR - C I agree it's likely not their fault and I think Dural is good, but our passing game is too inept for them not to shoulder a little of the blame.

Everything else looks pretty good. I might consider bumping either DL or LB down one. If it wasn't for Kwon, I would probably have LB at D so maybe them down to C.

QB - D-
RB - C+
FB - B-
WR - B-
TE - F
OL - C-
DL - F
LB - D
DB - B+
P - C
K - A-

Coaching - F

C+

D but c for running backs.

QB - D+: It's been bad for a lot of the time, but there have been flashes of good play. Just too inconsistent.

RB - B: Started slow, but OL play and stacked defenses had something to do with that. Seem to be improving.

FB - B-: Making some contributions, but not really game-changing, not bad.

WR - B+: I like this group. I'd like to see them getting a little more open more often, and there have been a couple of drops here and there, but overall they are a strength of the offense, despite being held back by poor QB play and play calling.

TE - D: Giving benefit of the doubt because I assume they are blocking. No factor in passing game, but again maybe not their fault given QB play and play calling.

OL - C: They have really struggled to open holes for the run or protect the QB, but have faced stacked defenses because passing game can't make teams pay for stacking the line and opponents know we'll keep running straight into the teeth of the defense no matter what anyway.

DL - F: I've really seen basically nothing redeeming here. Showed the first small spark of life all season in the Florida game. Hope that's a sign of improvement and not just a reflection of the quality of the opposing offense.

LB - C-: A few nice plays, but not a dominating group. 31 is too slow and not physical enough, but is apparently needed because of his field presence and knowledge of the defense. A slight break for this group because lack of DL play makes their job nearly impossible.

DB - C+: They've made some good plays, and I realize they are getting absolutely no help from the front 7, but they are busting coverages, losing battles to WRs on big catches and their tackling downfield has been absolutely atrocious. Still, they are the strength of the defense by default.

P - B-: Inconsistency holding Keehn back from an A

K - A-: Missing two xps is puzzling, but consistency on FGs is more important, in my view. Missing the xp after a TD isn't nearly the momentum killer that missing a FG after a nice drive can be. Nailing a couple of long kicks, including the game winner on Saturday, has been particularly nice. Kickoffs have been good for the most part.

KOR/PR - C-: They have not been a factor for us, but at least have not been turning the ball over with fumbled kicks or killing field position with silly plays.

Coverage - C+: Would have been higher before the two long punt returns gave Florida 14 points in a tight game. Otherwise, they have been reasonably solid, not getting many big hits or turnovers but nicely downing some balls deep on punt coverage and preventing long KO returns.

Coaching - D: At least one of the QBs should be further along at this point and, even if they're not, we can't just keep handcuffing them until it's 3rd and long and we're down by two scores every time. It's just setting them up to fail. The apparent trade-off with Jennings and Harris is that Jennings is more experienced and steady but doesn't have the talent of Harris, while Harris has the better talent, but is too young and will make more mistakes. But if Jennings makes the same mistakes and can't deliver the stability and additional consistency that usually comes with experience, then what's the downside of playing Harris? The OL should be playing better. The DL is playing horribly, but NFL defections and other attrition has a lot to do with that, although some big recruiting misses over the past two years loom even bigger right now, and that part is on the coaches. Two specific examples of extremely poor game planning have contributed to one loss and almost led to another. We faced a Wisconsin offense that could run well but couldn't pass, and waited until we were down 17 to start stacking the line and daring them to throw. We faced a Mississippi State defense that struggles against downfield passes but is elite in the front 7, and stubbornly tried to run straight at them until we were down by 2+ scores. Play calling on offense has been atrociously predictable and uncreative, even for a conservative offense with young QBs. Clock/game management issues have actually been a positive. Using the timeouts when UF was on the 2-yard line was the right thing to do, even though it almost cost us (until the INT bailed us out), and the snafu at the end of the half against Auburn couldn't have made a difference. Time management late in the Mississippi State game was good and actually gave us a chance to steal the win at the end. "Lesticles" trickery hasn't been much of a factor, but the faked punt against Wisconsin was certainly a positive. The 4th and goal attempt early vs. Miss. State wasn't necessarily a bad idea, but was certainly a horrible play call and execution.

Big picture: Other than the kickers, there is no aspect of this team which doesn't have room for drastic improvement. Kickers, RBs and WRs have been the highlights to this point.