Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Rand Paul Has Been Carousing With Bill Maher

Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:02 pm
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:02 pm
I thought I'd help Rolltide out a little with his duties as the PT board's unofficial Rand Paul press secretary.

quote:

Sen. Rand Paul has spent quite a bit of time reaching out to liberals over the past year, and that list apparently now includes Bill Maher.

Paul, a libertarian-leaning Republican from Kentucky, and Maher, a comedian who shares some of Paul's libertarian views, had drinks two weeks ago, Maher told the liberal news outlet Salon.

The two met not long after Maher said on his HBO show that Paul is "interesting" and could "possibly" get his vote. If the 2016 presidential race came down to Paul and Hillary Clinton, Maher said he might consider backing Paul.

Maher said he was most attracted to Paul because of the senator's general views on foreign policy, though he's not a fan of his recent support for bombing ISIS.

"He's great on ending the empire, not getting into any more foreign entanglements -- I'm even to the left of him on the bombing (of ISIS); he wants to keep bombing ISIS, I want us to stop bombing altogether," he said.

While Maher donated $1 million to a super PAC backing President Barack Obama in 2012, he has been less than enthusiastic about a potential Clinton presidency, especially when it comes to her foreign policy.

LINK /
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69884 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Rand Paul Has Been Carousing With Bill Maher



Thread title inaccurate, Toddy will be outraged
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
9298 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:05 pm to
Good to hear. I cannot say I am a huge fan of Bill Maher, but he is an intelligent, popular man. Paul would definitely benefit from having him on his side.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:05 pm to
Gotta say, if Rand keeps it up and doesn't go full retard for the primaries, as happens way too often for Republicans, I'd be tempted to vote for him.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69215 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:06 pm to
This is the wrong route the conservative movement is taking. We need law, order, and strength.
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5354 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Bill Maher, but he is an intelligent,


you apparently never saw him on celebrity jeopardy

straight idiot

he only knows what he's told. He has teams of writers.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:46 pm to
I see this as a Rand vs Jeb matchup taking form.

Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

This is the wrong route the conservative movement is taking. We need law, order, and strength.


What the hell does that even mean?
Posted by Circle K Beggar
Somewhere in the lower 48
Member since Feb 2011
6149 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

I see this as a Rand vs Jeb matchup taking form


pretty clear choice
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34542 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:27 pm to
Maher's libertarian act is bullshite. When the shite comes down, he'll back whatever liberal Dem is left.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:31 pm to
Do you think that Rand's effort to broaden the GOP base is all just a waste of time?
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34542 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Do you think that Rand's effort to broaden the GOP base is all just a waste of time?







Nope, not at all. Someone should have done it sooner.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Nope, not at all. Someone should have done it sooner.

So I take it that you believe some Democrats and Independents are persuadable, but just not Maher?
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73140 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:38 pm to
good

I would def consider voting for Rand
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34542 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

So I take it that you believe some Democrats and Independents are persuadable, but just not Maher?


Basically correct
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55437 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

This is the wrong route the conservative movement is taking. We need law, order, and strength.



That's just vague enough, and emotionally appealing, to be a good campaign slogan. The RNC will be contacting your forthwith.
Posted by DrunkerThanThou
Unfortunately Mississippi
Member since Feb 2013
2846 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 5:27 pm to
I thought the Republican Party learned their lesson about bumper sticker politics
This post was edited on 10/8/14 at 5:28 pm
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Bill Maher, but he is an intelligent, popular man. Paul would definitely benefit from having him on his side



A Republican candidate having Bill Maher "on his side" is never a good thing for that candidate.

If Bill Maher had said he kind of likes Chris Christie, would you say that Christie would benefit in the Republican primaries from that?

Of course he wouldn't. And neither will Rand.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73140 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 6:34 pm to
in the primaries, no

in the general, yes
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

in the primaries, no

in the general, yes





But Maher will NEVER, under any circumstances, support Rand Paul (or anyone else the GOP nominates) in the general election, no matter who the Democratic candidate is.


The full portion of the interview:

"To stay on what’s going on in American politics right now, I wanted to ask you about your feelings about Sen. Rand Paul. I know there’s been some exaggeration in terms of the degree to which you’re fond of him —

I never used those words. I said I was considering him and he was the first Republican I would even consider in a very long time.

And that’s because of his views on foreign policy?

Absolutely, yes. He’s great on ending the empire, not getting into any more foreign entanglements — I’m even to the left of him on the bombing [of ISIS]; he wants to keep bombing ISIS, I want us to stop bombing altogether.

Do you think he actually does, or do you think he’s positioning himself for 2016?

Well, he said that. He said he’s OK with air attacks. Because he’s not like his father, he’s much more…political, y’know. His father never gave an inch and [Rand Paul] really wants to be president.

I had drinks with him about two weeks ago. He’s a nice guy, he’s a smart guy. My big problem is I asked him about the environment, which is my big issue — because he had made a comment that was very similar to what Dick Cheney said about a month or two ago, which was basically, “Why are we talking the environment when ISIS is out there?”

I said, “Senator, y’know, you sounded just like Dick Cheney…”

How’d he take that?

Well, his answer on the environment was wholly unsatisfactory to me. Unless he comes around, big time, on that issue… I mean, I won’t even quote what he said to me, I’ll give him the chance to gather a better answer [laughs], but that would be a deal-breaker, right there, because Hillary Clinton said something awesome about [environmental issues] and I assume she’s going to be the other candidate. So, right on that issue, he would lose my vote.

I’m imagining a pained look on his face in response to you saying he’s like Dick Cheney. He doesn’t talk like this as much as he used to, but I think it’s pretty well understood that he’s not Cheney’s biggest fan.

Right. They’re diametrically opposed on a lot of that foreign policy stuff. But it’s very unfortunate that even he, who I consider, in the Republican Party, the most viable [presidential candidate], is apparently so far in the bubble on their environmental denial that he just doesn’t have an answer that sounds like it should come out of the mouth of any politician in the 21st century.

And coming from Kentucky — can you think of a worse circumstance for a politician in terms of being right on environmental issues?

Right, because we have to save those awesome jobs in coal-mining…

Which are dwindling, no matter what.

Yes, we have to save the worst job ever that is giving people black lung again.

Yeah, and he’s also said some stuff on mountaintop removal, which is just a horrible practice, that would probably make you retch.

[Laughs] It indeed would and, like I say, this is the deal-breaker issue with me. You’ve got to be good on this or, I’m sorry, not going to happen. But we’ll see."

Hillary Clinton vs. Rand Paul in the general, Mr. Maher? = see above.


LINK /
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram