- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
65% Estate Tax Proposal
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:11 am
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:11 am
Senator Bernie Saunders plan from Forbes article.
LINK /
quote:
“Unless we reduce skyrocketing wealth and income inequality,” he declared, “unless we end the ability of the super-rich to buy elections, the United States will be well on its way toward becoming an oligarchic form of society where almost all power rests with the billionaire class.”
Sanders thinks a new, stronger estate tax could stave off that sort of dystopian future – and help with other problems, too. “A progressive estate tax on multi-millionaires and billionaires is the fairest way to reduce wealth inequality, lower our $17 trillion national debt and raise the resources we need for investments in infrastructure, education and other neglected national priorities,” he argued.
Sanders may be right. But if he really wants to advance the case for remaking the estate tax (and undoing the damage done to it during the 2000s), he should talk less about redistributing wealth and more about shifting the tax burden.
Sanders likes to cast his proposal in grand historical terms, laying claim to a distinctly American tradition of progressive tax reform. “More than a century ago,” he wrote, “President Theodore Roosevelt recognized the danger of massive wealth and income inequality and what it meant to the economic and political well-being of the country. In addition to busting up the big trusts of his time, he fought for the creation of a progressive estate tax to reduce the enormous concentration of wealth that existed during the Gilded Age.”
LINK /
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:13 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Senator Bernie Saunders
He is a straight up Marxist-Leninist, so the only thing surprising is that it isn't a 100% Estate Tax Proposal.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:13 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Bernie Sanders; dr voted down
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:13 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
frick these people
You work hard not just to better your life but to give your children a better life and then these motherfrickers rob your grave
There should be NO estate tax
You work hard not just to better your life but to give your children a better life and then these motherfrickers rob your grave
There should be NO estate tax
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:13 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
When Warren Buffet says that income tax on the rich should be higher it's because his income is a tiny fraction of his wealth. I don't think Warren would be so keen on this wealth tax idea.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:14 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
65% Estate Tax Proposal
frick that shite. Why should the kids have to pay for inheriting what their parents worked their lifes to amass?
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:22 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
unless we end the ability of the super-rich to buy elections
So his solution to this, is to reduce wealth and not address campaign finance reform?
What a fricking clown
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:25 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:Very telling about Comrade Bernie.
Unless we reduce skyrocketing wealth
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:29 am to Zach
quote:I don't think you know Mr. Buffet very well. He supports raising estate taxes.
When Warren Buffet says that income tax on the rich should be higher it's because his income is a tiny fraction of his wealth. I don't think Warren would be so keen on this wealth tax idea.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:33 am to baytiger
quote:
I don't think you know Mr. Buffet very well. He supports raising estate taxes.
Point of clarification... Do you mean by 'estate taxes' = inheritance tax? Or do you mean 'estate taxes' = wealth that you have NOW, while you are alive?
If it's the former, he doesn't care. He'll be dead. But then Sanders idea is useless because increasing the death tax results in very little revenue.
If you mean the latter I need a link because I don't believe it.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:34 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Is this proposal over a certain amount? Like $5 mill?
If so I agree. If it's straight up 65% on all than that's way too much.
If so I agree. If it's straight up 65% on all than that's way too much.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:35 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
I vehemently oppose this.
quote:What fear-mongering bullshite.
“Unless we reduce skyrocketing wealth and income inequality,” he declared, “unless we end the ability of the super-rich to buy elections, the United States will be well on its way toward becoming an oligarchic form of society where almost all power rests with the billionaire class.”
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:35 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
So we're taking in more money to the federal coffers than anytime in the history of the world and the Dems (cause that dude is just a Dem+) STILL want MOAR????
Typical.
Typical.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:36 am to Scruffy
the fact that nobody is questioning whether or not there's a certain exemption amount is shocking to me. why would anybody (except the top 1%) oppose this if the limit is only for 10 million dollars or above?
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:37 am to baytiger
quote:
I don't think you know Mr. Buffet very well. He supports raising estate taxes.
How many companies has Buffet acquired because the owners were forced to sell due to shite like estate taxes? Not to mention his insurance and estate planning interests.
Just another clown talking his book.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:37 am to SirWinston
quote:
Is this proposal over a certain amount? Like $5 mill?
Why does this matter? People with large estates move their property into trusts and family corporations to avoid estate taxes.
Let's not pretend that human behavior doesn't adjust to tax policy.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:38 am to UncleFestersLegs
I love bernie. seems like one of the few not bought off yet by the money interests. I said yet
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:38 am to SirWinston
quote:
Is this proposal over a certain amount? Like $5 mill?
I think it is estates over $1 billion.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:38 am to SirWinston
quote:
why would anybody (except the top 1%) oppose this if the limit is only for 10 million dollars or above?
BECAUSE ITS NOT THE GOVERNMENTS frickING MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE
Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:38 am to SirWinston
quote:
why would anybody (except the top 1%) oppose this if the limit is only for 10 million dollars or above?
Because all that money is already taxed. Because government is pulling in record tax money.
Have you socialist clowns considered that the income gap has grown as taxes have increased?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News