- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Does the loss hurt more because of Dak?
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:42 am
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:42 am
Considering an instate guy that we didnt even recruit lit us up and our quarterback could not even hit an open receiver?
10
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:43 am to Jack Daniel
No bc Dak would have been terrible in our system just like the other 2.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:43 am to Jack Daniel
No, it hurts because it's a division loss to MS State.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:43 am to STEVED00
Touche
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:43 am to STEVED00
We would put dak in the I formation
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:44 am to Jack Daniel
Dak wouldn't have started till this year. He is a multi year starter at MSU. I'm fine with who we have at QB and not having Dak.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:45 am to Jack Daniel
Nope
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:45 am to catholictigerfan
We offered him a scholarship.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:46 am to STEVED00
Dak would look like Jefferson in our system. It's a coaching and x's and o's problem, not really a Jimmy and Joe's problem.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:47 am to Moustache
I was thinking the same thing lastnight, Moustache. He is impressive and huge, but wouldnt thrive here. He made the right choice going to State.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:47 am to tfl41
We didn't lose b/c of DAK.
We lost b/c we got dominated on both lines.
We lost b/c we got dominated on both lines.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:48 am to Moustache
quote:. Absolutely, and it's opposite on defense. We don't have the horses at DT.
Dak would look like Jefferson in our system. It's a coaching and x's and o's problem, not really a Jimmy and Joe's problem.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:48 am to tfl41
quote:
but wouldnt thrive here. He made the right choice going to State.
Seems to be a lot of that going around. (speedy, CROB)
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:49 am to catholictigerfan
quote:
He is a multi year starter at MSU.
He was splitting time with Russell before this year.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:51 am to c on z
quote:
He was splitting time with Russell before this year.
my bad, but the point is the guy was getting playing time, he would have seen the bench last year, and possibly lost the starting role to another QB this year. I don't care that he didn't come to LSU.
This post was edited on 9/21/14 at 8:51 am
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:52 am to Jack Daniel
No, not at all. Dak actually has a chance to play at a higher level because his coaches designed a system that he can succeed in. I'm happy for him. Would have preferred to see him look good while losing, though. 
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:53 am to Navytiger74
Miles would have tried to move him to DB
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:54 am to STEVED00
quote:
No bc Dak would have been terrible in our system just like the other 2.
This.
It should hurt Dan Mullen more because if he would have bit the bullet last year and played Dak exclusively, he would have been even better than he is now.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:54 am to Jack Daniel
Wait til all realize that states backup is also from LA.
Posted on 9/21/14 at 8:54 am to Jack Daniel
I couldn't care less about Dak being from Louisiana. We have two Dak types on our team.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News