Started By
Message

Spinoff thread: Was the Montreal Screwjob a work?

Posted on 9/17/14 at 9:42 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84766 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 9:42 pm
I have a really hard time believing that someone with the experience of a Bret Hart would not this that coming a mile away, and then on top of it let Shawn put him in his own submission finish where they could easily ring the bell on him. Also, Bret had reasonable creative control in his contract for the last 30 days. Why did he never sue? Why didn't Vince ever sue Bret for the punch? I saw Sean Waltman make the point that in the Bret documentary Vince sold the punch like hell and that Vince is the kind of guy that would never ever let you see any kind of injury or weakness and that he thought Vince was mugging for the camera.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13160 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 9:43 pm to
It was a shoot all day bro

Why would hart be a jobber in his last match?
This post was edited on 9/17/14 at 9:47 pm
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 9:44 pm to
Paul Heyman described it best..

quote:

"If I was the owner I'd do the same thing 'You're dropping the title tonight, no I'm not. frick you yes you are. My money, my company, my investment, my arse. You're dropping the title. Well I don't want to drop the title. Ok. no problem.......He's dropping the fricking title.'"
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13160 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 9:48 pm to
Hart's ego got the best of him.
Posted by rdw1690
Member since Mar 2010
6469 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Why didn't Vince ever sue Bret for the punch?

I think Vince felt bad about the whole thing and had a lot of respect for Bret and didn't think it was worth it. I'm sure it's not the first time he got punched by a wrestler.

I never quite understood why they didn't just let him drop the title at a different time but Bret needs to get over this "But we're in Canada and I'm Canadian" bullshite. By that logic you should only be winning titles in Canada too.

This was the best thing to ever happen to the WWF/E since it marked the beginning of the Attitude Era.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84766 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

but Bret needs to get over this "But we're in Canada and I'm Canadian" bullshite. By that logic you should only be winning titles in Canada too.


Later he said it was mostly because Shawn had told him a month or two before that he wouldn't put him over under any circumstances, and Bret wanted Shawn to do the honors first on RAW and then Bret would drop it to him at SS
Posted by Smokedawg
Finding Lennay Kekua
Member since Dec 2008
5401 posts
Posted on 9/17/14 at 10:05 pm to
As times passes I tend to believe more that it was a work.

Kevin Nash believes it was as well


Bret really can't complain, it didn't make him look weak and made people sympathize for him at the same time, while maintaining that he was a man of honor.
Posted by Draven
Moon, PA
Member since Jul 2014
808 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 6:15 am to
As a WWE historian, I can say with 100% certainty that it was not a work.
Posted by Eternally Undefeated
Member since Aug 2008
899 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 8:11 am to
I have no idea what any of this means, but the title "Montreal Screwjob" got my attention.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94645 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I have no idea what any of this means, but the title "Montreal Screwjob" got my attention.


Wrestling has pre-planned finishes that are to happen.

This is one where the promoter and the other wrestler involved changed the finish on the fly and beat the champion in a match where the champion was supposed to retain.



It's a bit long and convoluted to tell, but the results were Bret Hart leaving WWF for WCW, Shawn Michaels becoming WWF champion until Wrestlemania 14, where he lost to Steve Austin and then retired for about 5 years due to a back injury suffered at Royal Rumble two months prior to Wrestlemania, and Vince McMahon using the situation to become a bad guy figurehead for the company and set up the McMahon vs. Steve Austin feud that catapulted WWF into victory over WCW.
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68435 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 9:18 am to
I think Bret made a good financial decision but he could have been utilized better. Unfortunately he had a stroke shortly after Goldberg kicking him.
Posted by wheelz007
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2010
3342 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 9:23 am to
It was NOT a work.

Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
9932 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 9:31 am to
There was real pressure on Bret that year, he knew WCW was going to double what WWE was paying him even though he was supposed to be a WWE lifer. He had real backstage problems with HBK and anybody who hung out with him, going back to the days of the klik with Nash and Hall. Arguably Bret could have gave a little bit but he didnt feel he had to, and eventually McMahon got pissed with him and it became Bret vs. Vince. It was known that Survivor Series was going to be his last match, and he wanted to go out with glory not getting punked.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84766 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

As a WWE historian, I can say with 100% certainty that it was not a work.


Based on what
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:36 am to
No.


During that time Shawn would have bragged, he was scared. By that happening it allowed the Mr McMahon character to take form, which in turn allowed Steve Austin to ascend into the best tv wrestling ever offered.

After all these years, if it was a work it would have came out by now. No one, especially shawn, could have kept that secret for so long.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84766 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:37 am to
Shawn might not have been in on the work aspect of it
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:49 am to
He was in the office when hunter told Vince "frick Bret, if he doesn't want to do business, we will do business for him".

Just the way everyone acted, earl running off the backstage drama. Everything leading up to it with how Blaze treated the title on WCW. No way was Vince McMahon going to even risk his company while barely staying afloat as it already was.

I don't blame him at all.

It's one of the greatest moments in wrestling lore because it was real. Guys like Mick Foley talked about walking out, I don't think Vince would have risked that without letting some in on what was up if it was a work. He did what he did and he won.
Posted by Jack Bauer7
Member since Jun 2012
5026 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:51 am to
It was not a work, it was all planned...

From what i read, bascially Vince was scared that if Brett won he'd show up to WCW with the WWE title or some shite like that...
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57424 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Vince McMahon using the situation to become a bad guy figurehead for the company and set up the McMahon vs. Steve Austin feud that catapulted WWF into victory over WCW.
the WCW fall was an inside job. Even Eric bischoff said he they let him buy WCW it would have been for a lot more than what Vince bought it for.
Posted by Buck Magnum
Springdale
Member since Dec 2003
11610 posts
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:15 am to
The last thing McMahon would want Bret Hart to do is go in Nitro as the WWF champion. It happened with the womens title and McMahon would not let it happen again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram