- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Verizon to launch internet TV- customers pay for only channels they want
Posted on 9/13/14 at 9:52 am
Posted on 9/13/14 at 9:52 am
Streaming, on demand business is kicking traditional cable in the arse. It's about time they explore offering a-la-cart options.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:06 am to classictiger
Interested to see how this shakes out
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:09 am to classictiger
This could be huge, I keep one news station, keep the local stuff is something big is going on locally (and football games), the weather channel (for hurricane season and such), all the sports channels maybe including an MLB package so I could watch my tribe. That would probably be about it and that would be all I need. Netflix has movies and TV shows covered for the most part, if I was watching a new show I would just use Hulu. I could live with 10 channels and still watch all the shows I want to. I doubt 10 channels would be that expensive.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:09 am to classictiger
And people will find out the channels they really like actually make up the majority of their cable bill.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:20 am to classictiger
I'd definitely look into this and switch to it.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:23 am to classictiger
quote:
Verizon to launch internet TV- customers pay for only channels they want
I said I'd never leave Directv, but if this happens, I would in a heartbeat.
Although my bill really isn't that bad, I'm sure I could reduce it by 50% if I picked the 8-10 channels that I actually watch.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 10:39 am to Korin
It probably won't be on a per channel basis.
The price will be reflective of the subscriber cost of the channel.
Like the other guy said, this probably will make people realize that 80% of their cable bill comes from 15 channels.
The price will be reflective of the subscriber cost of the channel.
Like the other guy said, this probably will make people realize that 80% of their cable bill comes from 15 channels.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:38 am to Volvagia
This becomes relevant:
LINK
Just for the sake of argument, I would assume with a per channel or at least per package basis you can estimate these prices tripling, maybe quadrupling to cover losses of mass scale, but still, I would rather pay $40 a month for 10-15 channels I watch all the time than $120 dollars for 100 I don't.
I would companies sell things in packages at this point. You can't just get ESPN, you'd have to buy the ESPN package at $10 a month or something and get ESPN, ESPNews, ESPN2. (ESPN are terrible now anyways, I'd buy a FoxSports package over them in a heartbeat, probably for half the price.)
LINK
quote:
Here's how the cable business works: Cable companies pay monthly fees to media companies for every channel they carry as part of basic cable. And then, of course, they pass those fees onto you, the subscriber. As the chart below shows, those fees vary widely — from $5.54 per month per subscriber for ESPN, all the way down to $.05 per month per subscriber for CMT Pure Country. In other words, if you have cable, you're paying at least $5.54 per month for ESPN — even if you never watch it.
Just for the sake of argument, I would assume with a per channel or at least per package basis you can estimate these prices tripling, maybe quadrupling to cover losses of mass scale, but still, I would rather pay $40 a month for 10-15 channels I watch all the time than $120 dollars for 100 I don't.
I would companies sell things in packages at this point. You can't just get ESPN, you'd have to buy the ESPN package at $10 a month or something and get ESPN, ESPNews, ESPN2. (ESPN are terrible now anyways, I'd buy a FoxSports package over them in a heartbeat, probably for half the price.)
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:41 pm to classictiger
Is it only for mobile devices? If so, what does that mean I have to run a cable from my phone to the TV to stream on my TV? It would be nice if it was integrated with roku.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:59 pm to Freauxzen
you arent going to get the same cable prices per each channel on an a la carte system.
no way in hell you can get any any of those channels for that cheap b/c the cost wont be spread out over all subscribers.
sports channels alone will go up a massive amount.
no way in hell you can get any any of those channels for that cheap b/c the cost wont be spread out over all subscribers.
sports channels alone will go up a massive amount.
This post was edited on 9/13/14 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 9/13/14 at 1:40 pm to Dr RC
quote:
you arent going to get the same cable prices per each channel on an a la carte system.
no way in hell you can get any any of those channels for that cheap b/c the cost wont be spread out over all subscribers.
sports channels alone will go up a massive amount.
Hence This:
quote:
Just for the sake of argument, I would assume with a per channel or at least per package basis you can estimate these prices tripling, maybe quadrupling to cover losses of mass scale, but still, I would rather pay $40 a month for 10-15 channels I watch all the time than $120 dollars for 100 I don't.
The other thing is market correction. ESPN can charge that and take on those production costs right now because they have a lot of power. They'l have to adjust their business model to fit what value people place on their services.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 2:07 pm to Dr RC
quote:
you arent going to get the same cable prices per each channel on an a la carte system.
no way in hell you can get any any of those channels for that cheap b/c the cost wont be spread out over all subscribers.
I'd imagine it will be a flat access fee of X dollars and then you picking the channels you want on your package. So in reality, those prices could come close per channel, as the access fee revenues could be spread out to compensate.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 2:23 pm to classictiger
ESPN, Disney, abc
Fuuuuuucked
Fuuuuuucked
Posted on 9/13/14 at 5:45 pm to Volvagia
All I need are the basic channels, ESPN, TNT, and HBO.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 6:36 pm to classictiger
IP TV idea has been around for years now about time someone starts going thru with it.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:00 pm to classictiger
SFP will be here to tell that ISPs should be able to throttle your connection to this new Verizon tv
This post was edited on 9/13/14 at 11:01 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News