Started By
Message

Andrew Garfield talks about what went wrong with The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:04 pm
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:04 pm
It seems there were some issues during the creative process.
quote:

"I read a lot of the reactions from people," Garfield tells The Daily Beast, "and I had to stop because I could feel I was getting away from how I actually felt about it. For me, I read the script that Alex [Kurtzman] and Bob [Orci] wrote, and I genuinely loved it. There was this thread running through it... It’s interesting to do a postmortem. I’m proud of a lot of it and had a good time, and was a bit taken aback by the response."

"Once you start removing things and saying, 'No, that doesn’t work,' then the thread is broken," Garfield continues, "and it’s hard to go with the flow of the story. Certain people at the studio had problems with certain parts of it, and ultimately the studio is the final say in those movies because they’re the tentpoles, so you have to answer to those people."

"It’s a discernment thing," he explains. "What are the people actually saying? What’s underneath the complaint, and how can we learn from that? We can’t go, 'Oh God, we f--ed up because all these people are saying all these things! It’s s--t!' We have to ask ourselves, 'What do we believe to be true?' Is it that this is the fifth Spider-Man movie in however many years, and there’s a bit of fatigue? Is it that there was too much in there? Is it that it didn’t link? If it linked seamlessly, would that be too much? Were there tonal issues? What is it? I think all that is valuable. Constructive criticism is different from people just being dicks, and I love constructive criticism."
LINK
This post was edited on 9/10/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13542 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:18 pm to
That is actually some interesting insight and refreshingly honest.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:33 pm to
Yea, this kind of confirms that things went wrong with what they were trying to achieve. I hate it when a studio comes in and drastically changes things to the point where the director can no longer achieve his vision.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16303 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:38 pm to
Overall not bad, but the cgi was horrible.
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10047 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:47 pm to
I watched it for the first time today and really have no clue how everything connected. I completely missed the point of Peter finding his dad's lab. Was it just to hear him say Peter meant a lot to him? Still not sure what the actual plot of the movie was besides super bad guys vs good guy.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 9:54 pm to
I just don't like him as Spider-Man. He comes off as a little douchebag, like a guy who does a twenty minute touchdown dance after his very first score. This seems like he's blaming everything but himself.
Posted by jose canseco
Houston via Houma via BR via NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
5667 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:09 pm to
I didn't think there was supposed to be a plot. I enjoyed it. If you tell me a story line was intended, ehh....frick it. Shiny things and explosions was my expectations. It delivered.
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27227 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

He comes off as a little douchebag, like a guy who does a twenty minute touchdown dance after his very first score.


Yeah. I got the Fournette vibe too.
This post was edited on 9/10/14 at 10:36 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

I watched it for the first time today and really have no clue how everything connected.


Yeah, that's my problem with it. It's Spider-Man 3, but even worse. At least Spider-Man 3 is memorable, and the birth of the Sandman is actually one of the best scenes in comic book movie history. Sure most of the memorable parts (save the earlier mentioned scene) are slock, but at least I really remember it. Not sure if I remember a single line of dialog from ASM2, while I can think of a few from Spider-Man 3.

Just summarize this movie in a single sentence. If you can't, chances are it's shite. The best I can come up with is "Spider-Man pisses off some people and they kill his girlfriend." That's the best plot I can come up with. Compare that to basically every other comic book movie this summer, and they all have very easily summarized plots in one sentence.

And Garfield does have some good points. I didn't like the movie, but I think Garfield is still a really good Spider-Man.
This post was edited on 9/10/14 at 11:13 pm
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76167 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:25 pm to
I really enjoyed the movie. I didn't like Electro but I liked everything else.
Posted by Freder
Member since Aug 2014
809 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

It seems there were some issues during the creative process


Yea the problem usually occurs when:

quote:

Garfield goes on to say that studio changes had a lot to do with creating an end product that many fans felt was less than satisfactory.



Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:40 pm to
Garfield "is" spiderman...which says a lot given that both of the movies he has been in were utter shite.

Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

Garfield "is" spiderman...which says a lot given that both of the movies he has been in were utter shite.
Agreed. I think he is a great Spider-Man and it's unfortunate that his movies are bad, especially the last one. IMO though, all of the Spider-Man movies have been bad, with the exception of Spider-Man 2, which was not great but good. I don't understand why they can't get this character right. It makes me mad.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 1:39 am to
I didn't think The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was that bad. It certainly is not the train wreck Iron Man 3 and Man of Steel turned out to be
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 2:06 am to
quote:

I didn't think The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was that bad. It certainly is not the train wreck Iron Man 3 and Man of Steel turned out to be


I know you're a dumbass for putting IM3 on par with anything. It's the worst fricking comic book movie ever. At least MoS and Spidey actually had their title characters in uniform and in action for at least 60% of the movie. IM3 had Tony Stark actually being Iron Man for like maybe 5% of the movie. Pos.



1.) Man of Steel



2.) Amazing Spider-Man 2























3.) Iron Man 3
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39727 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 7:47 am to
Posted by GammaPro
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2008
724 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 7:47 am to
My son was a Spider-Man freak growing up. He's 20 now and told me just the other day that the thing he didn't like about the new movies is how they took away the randomness of the character and want to throw in this back story showing how Peter Parker was destined to become Spider-Man.

That's kind of what they did with the first Hulk film. It was like the gamma exposure was the incidental spark for a foregone conclusion to come about.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 7:50 am
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:56 am to
Says the guy that thought Man of Steel was worth a damn at all.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22390 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Says the guy that thought Man of Steel was worth a damn at all.




Ummm...thats what he was saying right there.


"I dont think MoS was bad at all"

"Says the guy that thought Man of Steel was worth a damn at all."



youre basically this guy




Mr. "Your basically this Guy"
Posted by glaucon
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2008
5292 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:48 am to
frick Man of Steel. Iron Man 3 actually had a few good character moments and memorable sequences. Man of Steel was 143 minutes of terrible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram