- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Wednesday Injury Repot 9/10
Posted on 9/10/14 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 9/10/14 at 4:10 pm
Stills was limited which is a good sign
cleveland also released theirs:
LINK
quote:
WR Kenny Stills (Quad) - Limited
S Marcus Ball (Hamstring) - Did Not Participate
FB Erik Lorig (Ankle) - Did Not Participate
DB Keenan Lewis (Knee) - Limited
LB Curtis Lofton (Shoulder) - Limited
cleveland also released theirs:
quote:
Tight end Jordan Cameron (shoulder), defensive lineman John Huges (hamstring) and linebacker Barkevious Mingo (shoulder) did not practice.
Tackle Joe Thomas did not practice but the Browns report said it wasn't injury related. Defensive lineman Desmond Bryant (wrist) and offensive lineman Paul McCquistan (ankle) were limited.
Running back Ben Tate was listed as out with a knee injury.
LINK
Posted on 9/10/14 at 4:11 pm to BlacknGold
Stills was listed as Limited on the Wednesday Report last week as well.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 4:21 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Stills was listed as Limited on the Wednesday Report last week as well.
then he was DNP on Thursday... so tomorrow will be very interesting
if he's even limited tomorrow... it should look better for him playing
Posted on 9/10/14 at 4:30 pm to rt3
let him rest longer. Our offense wasn't the problem last week.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 4:36 pm to Neauxla
guess my point is our report looks pretty good health wise while the browns seem to have some issues.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 5:34 pm to BlacknGold
We need Lofton, but I'm sure with "a shoulder" he can still tackle better than most. He proved that last week.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 6:37 pm to Sparkplug#1
Read earlier that Lorig and Ball did conditioning work. Hopefully that means they're only a couple of weeks away.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 8:36 pm to BlacknGold
I'll be happy with sitting Stills out until post-bye week.
The way we were on offense, it was balanced enough that we can do fine with the options we have. Cooks looks legit, Colston outside of the fumble was still playing like a #1, and JG is getting a bit more space to work with. Add in PT/Watson and the occasional deep shot to morgan/meachem and the balanced run game that is producing and we're fine.
Next 4 games:
@ Cleveland - Pittsburgh put up 30 points against them
vs. Minnesota - I'll tell you more after this week, Rams were overall horrible
@ Dallas - No comment needed
vs. Tampa Bay - A cam newton-less Carolina team came to their turf and scored 20 points. Derek Anderson went 6.8y/a and 70.6% completion with 2 TDs.
Think about it this way, our first game/road game of the season and we scored 34 points. Last year's highest road score was 27 points and 26 points to NE and Chicago/Philly
The way we were on offense, it was balanced enough that we can do fine with the options we have. Cooks looks legit, Colston outside of the fumble was still playing like a #1, and JG is getting a bit more space to work with. Add in PT/Watson and the occasional deep shot to morgan/meachem and the balanced run game that is producing and we're fine.
Next 4 games:
@ Cleveland - Pittsburgh put up 30 points against them
vs. Minnesota - I'll tell you more after this week, Rams were overall horrible
@ Dallas - No comment needed
vs. Tampa Bay - A cam newton-less Carolina team came to their turf and scored 20 points. Derek Anderson went 6.8y/a and 70.6% completion with 2 TDs.
Think about it this way, our first game/road game of the season and we scored 34 points. Last year's highest road score was 27 points and 26 points to NE and Chicago/Philly
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:23 pm to htran90
I agree with what you posted, and will so far as to say Cleveland gets us in a bad mood and it won't be pretty for them.
However, playing Devil's advocate, what if our non-existent DL and miss-tackling 30-yards-back prevent defense shows up again? What if we really got our projections wrong?
I mean, if you would've told me the Falcons would not have Sam Baker or Jake Matthews in for significant snaps, I would've predicted Matt Ryan being carted off the field in a 42-7 blowout.
However, playing Devil's advocate, what if our non-existent DL and miss-tackling 30-yards-back prevent defense shows up again? What if we really got our projections wrong?
I mean, if you would've told me the Falcons would not have Sam Baker or Jake Matthews in for significant snaps, I would've predicted Matt Ryan being carted off the field in a 42-7 blowout.
Posted on 9/10/14 at 11:34 pm to LSUFreek
I'm just saying from the perspective of the offense, we would have scored a minimum of 37 points and a high of 41 points if not for the INT in the redzone (highly uncharacteristic of Brees).
Adding Stills may have added a FG/TD (I think he's a better WR than Morgan/Meachem at this point, if he's healthy), but the problem still rests in our defense playing the 2012-scheme where we forced square pegs into round holes.
The question is, will a hampered Stills be more productive than Morgan/Meachem as a deep threat? We assume Stills plays, stills stays. He can easily re-injure himself if we rush him.
Adding Stills may have added a FG/TD (I think he's a better WR than Morgan/Meachem at this point, if he's healthy), but the problem still rests in our defense playing the 2012-scheme where we forced square pegs into round holes.
The question is, will a hampered Stills be more productive than Morgan/Meachem as a deep threat? We assume Stills plays, stills stays. He can easily re-injure himself if we rush him.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 5:03 am to LSUFreek
quote:They won't. Jesus...why is it so hard for you tards to understand WHY Ryan had the DB's playing so deep? Is this your first year to start watching the game?
However, playing Devil's advocate, what if our non-existent DL and miss-tackling 30-yards-back prevent defense shows up again?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News