Started By
Message
locked post

Obama signs off on request for more U.S. Troops in Iraq

Posted on 9/2/14 at 7:29 pm
Posted by pistolpete23
In the present
Member since Dec 2007
7122 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 7:29 pm
quote:

U.S. President Barack Obama on Tuesday authorized a request for an additional 350 troops to be sent to Iraq to protect American diplomatic facilities and personnel in Baghdad, according to a statement released by the White House. "The request he approved today will allow some previously deployed military personnel to depart Iraq, while at the same time providing a more robust, sustainable security force for our personnel and facilities in Baghdad," the statement said.


LINK
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 7:30 pm
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 7:29 pm to
Well shiiiiiit
Posted by Edearl Watson
Parts Unknown
Member since May 2012
6782 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:52 pm to
Warmongering, chickenhawk, neocon.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70646 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:53 pm to
NO BLOOD FOR OIL!
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33257 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:54 pm to
So, too much, too little or both? I'm guessing it's both.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:56 pm to
My, my, my.

The more things change.......
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73403 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:57 pm to
What's that make 1400 or so troops?
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9414 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:28 pm to
Isn't it tradition for presidents and congress to come together and declare war before pouring troops into another country, or did I read that in a fiction book?
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:31 pm to
Moar war...looks like a significant chunk of the board is going to get its wish!
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:34 pm to
No boots on the ground!

AH, the good old days of last month with Obozo.
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:24 pm to
The war is over, I mean these are just supplemental eyes and ears, not boots on the ground, in order to protect our information collectors on the ground.

What I really mean is is is, welp, we should just send an ambassador to the new Islamic State a recognize them in an official capacity.

AllllllllIIIHAJIIIII OOOOOO MAAAAA SAAAAA HAAAAAAMMMBIAAAAA.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57712 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:27 pm to
If he keeps releasing more soldiers to protect embassies, before you know it, we'll be at war again!
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:35 pm to
1. We never stopped being at war

2. No matter what Obama does, it'll be considered the worst decision ever made in the history of man by 90% of this board
(Just a neutral observation)

3. What should he do instead?
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48225 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:42 pm to
quote:

1. We never stopped being at war

WRONG. OBAMA DECLARED MANY TIMES THAT HE PERSONALLY ENDED THE IRAQ WAR AND BROUGHT THE TROOPS HOME.

2. No matter what Obama does, it'll be considered the worst decision ever made in the history of man by 90% of this board
(Just a neutral observation)

WRONG. A GROSS OVERSIMPLIFICATION. NOWADAYS, EVEN DEMOCRATS LIKE FEINSTEIN ARE BASHING OBOZO.

3. What should he do instead?

Oh, I don't know . . . perhaps pay attention to warnings about ISIS and precipitate withdrawal from Iraq? But no, not when political considerations trump all.




Posted by socraticsilence
Member since Dec 2013
1347 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:10 am to
quote:

1. We never stopped being at war

WRONG. OBAMA DECLARED MANY TIMES THAT HE PERSONALLY ENDED THE IRAQ WAR AND BROUGHT THE TROOPS HOME.

2. No matter what Obama does, it'll be considered the worst decision ever made in the history of man by 90% of this board
(Just a neutral observation)

WRONG. A GROSS OVERSIMPLIFICATION. NOWADAYS, EVEN DEMOCRATS LIKE FEINSTEIN ARE BASHING OBOZO.

3. What should he do instead?

Oh, I don't know . . . perhaps pay attention to warnings about ISIS and precipitate withdrawal from Iraq? But no, not when political considerations trump all.


Hey dumbass, please point to the person who knew of ISIS much less thought of them as a threat at the time we withdrew troops from Iraq in 2012.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78816 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:44 am to
Incompetence at it's finest.....And what does that say about the intelligence community and their gross oversight on ISIS?

"Ohhhhhhh, well we were just joking about the troops coming home. Sorry!"
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27813 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 5:17 am to
Mitt Romney
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73403 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:11 am to
quote:

Hey dumbass, please point to the person who knew of ISIS much less thought of them as a threat at the time we withdrew troops from Iraq in 2012.
You talking about the same ISIS this fricking idiot said was the JV, then claimed we were caught by surprise at the rapid advancement of said ISIS? Now we know he has been briefed on ISIS for over a year. If only he paid attention to the Presidential Daily Briefing. Yeah who is the dumbass?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Hey dumbass, please point to the person who knew of ISIS much less thought of them as a threat at the time we withdrew troops from Iraq in 2012.


A prudent planner does not plan for a specific threat per se, but for a general threat. The consensus amongst conservatives is that we should have negotiated a Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government into the foreseeable future (five to ten years) to ensure that gains we made in securing Iraq took root (hedging our bets if you will). The problem is, President Obama saw this as a political issue (conclude the war in Iraq and withdraw the troops as soon as possible) rather than a looming security issue. Quite frankly, I agreed with President Obama simply because I saw the situation as a festering sore and wanted it to go away. In retrospect, I was wrong and so was he. However, my opinion has negligible impact. His decision has tremendous implications for the stability of the Middle East.

Should have waited to withdraw troops.
Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15346 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:52 am to
"Let me be perfectly clear, and make no mistake about it..."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram