Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

1 Back vs. 2 Back Sets

Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:32 am
Posted by Joe Banks
Waponi Woo
Member since May 2008
604 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:32 am
Let me start by saying I'm not against running the football. I don't believe we have to throw it all over the field to win.
Here are some stats from last night. Unfortunately I missed from 4:47 in the 1st quarter til 11:00 in the second due to thunderstorm and satellite.

2 back running plays gained 45 yds on 19 attempts for an average of 2.37 yds.
I didn't even count a 2 yd gain on a reverse and a -11 yd loss on a fumbled pitch.

1 back set running plays gained 106 yds on 15 carries for 7.07 yds.
These numbers support a belief I've had for a while.
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 11:49 am
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
22443 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:34 am to
we should play two back sets with hilliard/fournette

defenses won't know what the frick is happening. the wisconsin defense was afraid of fournette and were focusing in on him every play
Posted by Joe Banks
Waponi Woo
Member since May 2008
604 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:36 am to
Let's give it a try and if it works keep doing it.
Posted by LawLessTyGer
Bay of Ponchartrain
Member since Jan 2009
1256 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:37 am to
Blows my mind, would love to see us spread the field and have only one RB...
We do it from shotgun, why not under center more?
My belief is we will need to so that teams won't stack the box against us....
Posted by Joe Banks
Waponi Woo
Member since May 2008
604 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:40 am to
Absolutely. In 2 back sets they were putting 8 in box, one more than we could block. 1 back sets they put six, the same number as our blockers.
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:42 am to
If we actually learn how to run the read and speed option, then yes, go one back set
Posted by Joe Banks
Waponi Woo
Member since May 2008
604 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:48 am to
So the numbers aren't good enough for you. Also, we ran the read pretty well last night.
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10479 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:50 am to
It's not necessarily 1 back vs 2 backs, it's more WRs and spreading the field out. The threat of a pass is there so safeties are back, and someone has to leave the box to go cover the wideouts.

It's simple physics really and I don't see how the coaches can't see this. When there are fewer people in a small area, you have a better chance of not getting tackled. We have some of the best backs in the country too, spread that shite out and let them gain some yards! And if they still pack the box, throw that shite cause somebody isn't being covered
Posted by Joe Banks
Waponi Woo
Member since May 2008
604 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 11:53 am to
I'm getting you some headsets for the next game my brother.
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10479 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 12:13 pm to
Do you disagree with me?
Posted by Joe Banks
Waponi Woo
Member since May 2008
604 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 2:05 pm to
I want you with some headsets on and tell them to scale back on the 2 back sets. There is a time and a place but it shouldn't be our primary running set.
You mentioned that it wasn't the 1 or 2 back sets but rather the numbers of receivers but that is what dictates our number of receivers
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 2:06 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram