- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dad acquitted in slaying of driver who killed sons
Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:05 pm
Maybe not political but it has to do with our justice system just the same.
No gun, no proof
quote:
ANGLETON, Texas (AP) — A southeast Texas man says that despite his acquittal Wednesday for the shooting death of the drunken driver who caused a crash that killed his two sons, there are no winners.
No gun, no proof
Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:10 pm to Homesick Tiger
Note to self: acquire an untraceable gun.
Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:13 pm to Homesick Tiger
Kind of incredible to me it went that far with pretty much no evidence and only motive.
Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:20 pm to Homesick Tiger
Good, he shoulda been.
Posted on 8/28/14 at 2:28 pm to Homesick Tiger
They had nothing to convict him with. It was kind of a cut and dry case.
Posted on 8/28/14 at 3:02 pm to TexasTiger89
quote:
Justice wins
My thought exactly.
Posted on 8/28/14 at 3:06 pm to Homesick Tiger
Hispanic on Hispanic, Black on Black and White on White crime = No MSM Interest
This post was edited on 8/28/14 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 8/28/14 at 3:23 pm to tysonslefthook
Who the hell shot this guy if not the accused? I wouldn't call this case shut and dry at all, simply lacking some crucial pieces of evidence. If I recall, didn't this guy claim not to own any firearm, yet they found ammunition consistent with that used upon the victim in his home?
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:48 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
Who the hell shot this guy if not the accused? I wouldn't call this case shut and dry at all, simply lacking some crucial pieces of evidence.
In my mind, the guy accused shot the guy. But there isn't evidence, only motive. You want to start convicting people based on nothing but motive?
quote:
If I recall, didn't this guy claim not to own any firearm, yet they found ammunition consistent with that used upon the victim in his home?
Circumstantial
Posted on 8/28/14 at 5:17 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
No gun, no proof
quote:
there was little physical evidence linking Barajas to the killing.
quote:Sounds like the jury did the right thing
Further complicating their case was that there were no witnesses who identified Barajas as the shooter, and gunshot residue tests done on Barajas came back negative.
Posted on 8/28/14 at 5:47 pm to Homesick Tiger
A slicker Gary Plauche?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News