- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If granting amnesty is such a winning political position
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:05 pm
why didn't Obama pass an amnesty bill while the Dems controlled the House and Senate?
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:07 pm to Revelator
Because they were too busy with other things, haven't you heard the excuses yet?
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:07 pm to Revelator
Cause he was too busy forcing Obamacare on America.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:08 pm to Revelator
It's not a winning issue... if it was it would have been enacted years ago multiple times
Rush says this every day, its not a winning issue at all
It's only a winning issue for big business and those who stand to benefit
Rush says this every day, its not a winning issue at all
It's only a winning issue for big business and those who stand to benefit
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:09 pm to constant cough
Can you say filibuster.
Both sides use it to stop everything.
Both sides use it to stop everything.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:15 pm to goldennugget
quote:
It's not a winning issue... if it was it would have been enacted years ago multiple times
It's not a winning issue, but do you doubt for a moment that the Republicans will back amnesty in some form or another?
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:27 pm to goldennugget
quote:Big business would only benefit from highly skilled technical programmers that cost $15-$25K to sponsor to get to America. The low skilled uneducated crossing the southern border are of no benefit to BIG business.
It's only a winning issue for big business
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:31 pm to dante
Because it would have destroyed his chances in the election. Now, he has nothing to lose.....well except 12 million potential votes that is for the dems.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:33 pm to dante
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/6/14 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:36 pm to dante
Because it would have destroyed his chances in the election. Now, he has nothing to lose.....well except 12 million potential votes that is for the dems.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:37 pm to bamarep
bamarep....you having a hard time with the submit button
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:53 pm to pjcantrelle
quote:
Can you say filibuster. Both sides use it to stop everything.
They were filibuster proof for 2 years! He could have passed literally anything he wanted for 2 years.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 1:57 pm to Jimbeaux28
quote:
They were filibuster proof for 2 years! He could have passed literally anything he wanted for 2 years.
One year. Scott Brown was sworn in Feb 2010 which is why they had to pass the final Obamacare using through reconcilation or whatever that's called.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 2:20 pm to Bard
quote:
Because they were too busy with other things, haven't you heard the excuses yet?
Yeah...this was the bullshite his press secretary was spewing the other day.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News