- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Under the Skin (Scarlett Johansson's fully nude movie)
Posted on 7/16/14 at 3:24 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 7/16/14 at 3:24 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Jonathan Glazer, the director, is without a doubt the next Stanley Kubrick.
1
Posted on 7/16/14 at 3:38 pm to mizzoukills
Came here hoping to see pics
Posted on 7/16/14 at 4:14 pm to SEClint
quote:
Came here hoping to see pics
They are everywhere...how have you people not seen the pics? Reddit has all sorts with the light enhanced and whatnot and everything.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 4:17 pm to Ace Midnight
Killz
Ace Midnight
Have you seen this movie or any other Jonathan Glazer movie?
"The next Stanley Kubrick" is a more than appropriate comparison.
quote:
Jonathan Glazer, the director, is without a doubt the next Stanley Kubrick.
Ace Midnight
quote:
It's time to stop posting
Have you seen this movie or any other Jonathan Glazer movie?
"The next Stanley Kubrick" is a more than appropriate comparison.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 4:51 pm to mizzoukills
honestly, i described the movie as written by lynch but directed by kubrick
bama, they are real. and they are spectacular.
bama, they are real. and they are spectacular.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 5:19 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
"The next Stanley Kubrick" is a more than appropriate comparison.
No it's not. And I liked this movie btw.
Under the Skin might be worse than every Kubrick film. Most people don't even know who Glazer is and it's not like he's very young. I think he's almost 50. He better have an incredible 20 years if he wants to sniff Kubrick.
Unless you are just saying their styles are similar?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 5:35 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
Unless you are just saying their styles are similar?
pretty sure this is exactly what we are talking about. it just looks like a kubrick film.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 5:40 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Regardless, Scarlett Johansson is fully naked multiple times, so there's that too...
:addingtodvdqueue:
Posted on 7/16/14 at 5:46 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
bama, they are real. and they are spectacular.
Hardly, easily the most disappointing nude reveal I've seen.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 5:52 pm to BlacknGold
Saying someone is the next Stanley Kubrick is not the same thing as saying their styles are similar.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:25 pm to DallasTiger11
Pardon my ignorance but is this an "old" movie or a recent release?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:39 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
bama, they are real. and they are spectacular.
Actually she had implants, and then she went back and had a reduction. Here is a link talking about it: LINK
Before and after implant:
Before and after reduction:
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:47 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Have you seen this movie or any other Jonathan Glazer movie?
I've seen some of his music videos and commercials, bits of Sexy Beast (not interested).
By the time Kubrick was 45, he had directed:
Paths of Glory (1957)
Spartacus (1960)
Lolita (1962)
Dr. Strangelove (1964)
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
A Clockwork Orange (1971)
Glazer is 49 and has directed Sexy Beast, Birth and Under the Skin
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:48 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Glazer is 49 and has directed Sexy Beast, Birth and Under the Skin
I am actually a huge fan of Sexy Beast but his resume is ZERO compared to Kubes. Zero.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:50 pm to DallasTiger11
Dallas,
Clearly I was referring to style. If you can't see style and tone similarities, then we'll just have to disagree.
And I consider myself a Kubrick aficionado. Studied him in media school at Missouri State. I feel that I can tell if a movie has a Kubrick look and feel.
And some very respectable movie critics agree.
Clearly I was referring to style. If you can't see style and tone similarities, then we'll just have to disagree.
And I consider myself a Kubrick aficionado. Studied him in media school at Missouri State. I feel that I can tell if a movie has a Kubrick look and feel.
And some very respectable movie critics agree.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:52 pm to mizzoukills
Just googled
:moist:
:moist:
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:07 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Clearly I was referring to style. If you can't see style and tone similarities, then we'll just have to disagree.
Ah, well that's different then. I haven't seen the films, honestly, and I don't get the style from his music videos and commercials (and I'm not a snob - Ridley Scott, my favorite director, has a significant body of commercial work, and there is the potential for artistic expression there, as well).
So, I can't agree or disagree on that point.
What brought me into the thread was the part where you said:
quote:
Jonathan Glazer, the director, is without a doubt the next Stanley Kubrick.
And that is unsupportable hyperbole - at best.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:41 pm to SG_Geaux
Your avatar is appropriate here.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 9:32 pm to Ace Midnight
Ace,
Watch the movie and report back with an honest critique
Watch the movie and report back with an honest critique
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News