- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What does the Gee acquisition have to do with Asik?
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:16 pm
They can't be unrelated to each other right? We don't have the space to absorb Asik, yet we are taking on more salary? Gee can't get moved within a certain timeframe unless this is part of a 3 team deal with Houston to get Asik out of H-Town? Or am I completely off-base here?
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:16 pm to ShamelessPel
quote:
@RealGM: The Alonzo Gee trade was never finalized/official between Cavs/Hornets.
And his contract is not guaranteed, so chances are he won't even put on a Pels uniform.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:17 pm to LosLobos111
If Demps brings in Asik without dumping Rivers or any of the core 5, my faith will be 100% completely restored, and I will never question the man again.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:18 pm to ShamelessPel
quote:
If Demps brings in Asik without dumping Rivers or any of the core 5, my faith will be 100% completely restored, and I will never question the man again.
And all indications are that a trade for Gee's contract would accomplish that.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:19 pm to ShamelessPel
We have broken the internet record today on threads regarding Alonzo Gee.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:19 pm to Jwho77
quote:
And all indications are that a trade for Gee's contract would accomplish that.
How?
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:20 pm to hendersonshands
I would also like to know how.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:20 pm to hendersonshands
quote:quote:
And all indications are that a trade for Gee's contract would accomplish that.
How?
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:20 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
How?
The 3.2 non guaranteed contract should clear the space to trade for Asik without moving Rivers.
ETA: This is assuming all of our ducks are already lined up. If Rivers' 2.5 wasn't enough, this makes sense. We can trade the non-guaranteed contracts of Gee, Ely, Babbitt, Ajinca, and maybe have a trade exception involving Aminu or Roberts (Memphis or another 4th team?) for Asik? Houston would then renounce the rights to those players?
This post was edited on 7/11/14 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:21 pm to ShamelessPel
quote:
The 3.2 non guaranteed contract should clear the space to trade for Asik without moving Rivers.
How?
Gee was never on our team. Therefore he would be traded into cap space and we would then waive him. It doesn't create any space.
So someone explain it to me.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:21 pm to ShamelessPel
What will we send away? If we take on 3.2 mil then cut 3.2 mil, aren't we right back where we started? Or do we send the 3.2 mil to Houston for them to wave?
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:23 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
Or do we send the 3.2 mil to Houston for them to wave?
This is what I'm assuming is happening.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:23 pm to hendersonshands
McNamara had written about how Demps wanted someone to do a sign-and-trade for a current Pels free agent to send out at least $2.4 million and hopefully at least $3.2 million towards this year's cap to complete the Asik trade. Using Gee's contract must accomplish the same thing.
See July 3rd LINK
See July 3rd LINK
This post was edited on 7/11/14 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:23 pm to ShamelessPel
Is there not a period of time that you have to wait to trade a player you traded for?
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:24 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
Is there not a period of time that you have to wait to trade a player you traded for?
I thought the same thing, unless the trade will be a 3 way trade involving the Cavs.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:25 pm to ShamelessPel
Yeah, a straight up 2-team deal really doesn't make any sense to me. I'm not cap expert though so we'll see.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:25 pm to ShamelessPel
Can somebody give me this at like a 5th grade level so I can understand?
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:26 pm to danman6336
quote:
Mason Ginsberg @MasonGinsberg
Follow
Alonzo Gee's contract is fully unguaranteed, so it could be going back out in the Asik deal.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News