- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Impeach Holder Movement
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:09 pm
8
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:10 pm to Zach
Obama would replace him with somebody equally hackish so I don't see the point.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:13 pm to Zach
Isn't Holder supposed to be stepping down any day now? Thought he was only going to stay two years into the second term.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:20 pm to Zach
He should have been removed along time ago. Whatever happened to being held in contempt of congress? GOP worthless yet again.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:24 pm to Decatur
quote:
Isn't Holder supposed to be stepping down any day now? Thought he was only going to stay two years into the second term.
He said he would make his decision after the election. Didn't tip his hand 'stay or go.'
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:25 pm to Zach
quote:What crime has been found in the IRS scandal that the Committee isn't investigating? Would Holder get involved in a Contempt of Congress charge?
Thoughts?
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:37 pm to Zach
I'm all fot it. Holder's impeachment is looooonnnnnggggg overdue. He is the worst partisan hack we've had as AG in my lifetime, and I'm old.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:31 pm to Zach
quote:
Thoughts?
The rabble in the House may impeach all they want but it still takes a 2/3 majority in the Senate for a conviction. It's political theater, signifying nothing.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:33 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Obama would replace him with somebody equally hackish so I don't see the point.
By this logic, we should never arrest any criminals because they'll always be more to take their place.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:35 pm to Layabout
You people who defend this administration amaze me. These people have been so horrible for America and mainly for the poor people who support them. I can understand being a liberal or Democrat but I can't understand by now still defending what has become the worst administration in my 32 yrs of voting. As for as Holder,it don't matter, he is gone when the other clowns go anyway.
This post was edited on 7/10/14 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:36 pm to Zach
Cruz? 
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:48 pm to TT9
Liberals?
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:53 pm to Layabout
quote:
The rabble in the House may impeach all they want but it still takes a 2/3 majority in the Senate for a conviction. It's political theater, signifying nothing.
this. Its not going to happen.
I extremely dislike holder, but then I try to recollect a AG that I liked and I can't think of one. Gonzales, ashcroft and reno all sucked, and I thought they were all just as worthy of impeachment as Holder.
Maybe its just an impossible job?
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:57 pm to Zephyrius
Maybe those in congress should actually worry about passing legislation besides doing this shite. No wonder they have the lowest approval rating ever.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 5:21 pm to Zach
Useless, really. BTW, this whole episode has exposed a new flaw in our system; such being the obvious: The Attorney General/DOJ SHOULD NOT be in any way able to be co-opted by the President. The very idea that a POTUS can appoint someone to virtually UNDERMINE Congressional/Judicial accountability and separation of equal powers is totally impractical.
I think the old system just made the assumption that anybody that won the Presidency, and anybody who rose high enough to be considered for the post of AG...would be impeccably honest.
Well, so much for traditional assumptions. This needs to be fixed. The AG should be a product of the Congress. 2/3 majority in each Branch. They'd have to pick someone everybody knew was honest.
Ugly.
I think the old system just made the assumption that anybody that won the Presidency, and anybody who rose high enough to be considered for the post of AG...would be impeccably honest.
Well, so much for traditional assumptions. This needs to be fixed. The AG should be a product of the Congress. 2/3 majority in each Branch. They'd have to pick someone everybody knew was honest.
Ugly.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News