Started By
Message
locked post

The ACLU's disappointing stance on the Hobby Lobby decision

Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:08 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:08 pm
LINK

quote:

The American Civil Liberties Union, religious organizations, other civil rights and women’s health groups, business leaders, and members of Congress filed friend-of-the-court briefs arguing that the companies’ owners cannot impose their personal religious beliefs on employees to withhold coverage for health services with which they disagree.

"This is a deeply troubling decision. For the first time, the highest court in the country has said that business owners can use their religious beliefs to deny their employees a benefit that they are guaranteed by law," said Louise Melling, deputy legal director of the ACLU. "Religious freedom is a fundamental right, but that freedom does not include the right to impose beliefs on others. In its ruling today, the Court simply got it wrong."


People are losing sight of what this debacle is really is really about. I respect the the ACLU and they do really good work as they are a very pro freedom organization but they forget the greater civil liberty here and that's private property rights and religious freedom.

The bolded is simply so deceptive and vague. The employees and the gov't are violating the employers religious beliefs by forcing them to cover something they have a religious objection to. That's bad enough and then they say their reproductive care is not their employers business? Uh it clearly is when their boss is paying for it. Don't like it? Pay for it on your own, this decision is not stopping you from doing that and it's hilarious how people are neglecting to mention that. It's all about them.

With regards to ObamaCare and the constiution, in what world do they think that statutory laws can supersede constiutional rights?
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:12 pm to
It's mind-boggling. No one is forced to work at Hobby Lobby.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18644 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:19 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 8:41 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69227 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:19 pm to
1) No one if forced to work at HL

2) If you DO work at HL, you are not barred from using birth control

End of story. There is no "imposing" of beliefs on the part of the owners.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18644 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:24 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 8:39 pm
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28209 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

It's mind-boggling. No one is forced to work at Hobby Lobby.



Now don't bring any of that logical thinking and self accountability into this (faux) "civil rights" crusade
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69227 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

labor laws
As far as I know, Labor laws do not open a can of worms when it comes to constitutional rights. The point holds though. The behavior of the EMPLOYEE is not in any sense restricted by this ruling. And the boss has every damn right to deny certain benefits. It's his damn company. Petulant thieves are on the other side.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18644 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:39 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 8:42 pm
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31422 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

as the RFRA is a congress creating a law respecting the establishment of religion


well, no.

eta: if that's true, then the first amendment is a violation of itself.
This post was edited on 7/2/14 at 10:47 pm
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18644 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:48 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 8:41 pm
Posted by Doosh606
The DC
Member since Apr 2008
3232 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:50 pm to
quote:


I don't like Obamacare. I don't agree that employers should have to give their employees healthcare at all. It's silly to have to go through your fricking employer to get healthcare. It's an antiquated system that we should be far beyond at this point.

But where do we get this idea that employers don't have any obligations whatsoever to their employees


I'll take contradictory statements for a thousand, trebek.
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16862 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

But where do we get this idea that employers don't have any obligations whatsoever to their employees?


Perhaps you should be informed that Hobby Lobby provides 16 types of birth control for their employees and has provided these benefits prior to Obama care.

If the employee wants one of the types of BC that Hobby Lobby doesn't provide, they can avail themselves to the exchanges and buy their own policies.

It's simple as that.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18644 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:51 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 8:42 pm
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18644 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:52 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 8:42 pm
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

No one is forced to work at Hobby Lobby.


For less than $14 an hour full time.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:02 pm to
The ACLU has never suppprted an individual's right to own a firearm IIRC.

I have mixed feelings about the organization and their tepid support of the 2nd makes it very hard for me to support them at all.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9079 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:02 pm to
The fact that the argument is about what kind of healthcare companies "must" supply and not about the insanity of government forcing companies to be health insurance suppliers in the first place shows just how far off the tracks this nation is.

Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16862 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

but this point is really irrelevant


No it's not

quote:

we could be talking about anything


We are talking about birth control, something that HL provided prior to Obama care
quote:

Exempting one company from the law based on their religious beliefs and not exempting all other companies.


Perhaps, these other companies you speak about should file their own lawsuit it they do not like the provisions of the law.
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16862 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

The fact that the argument is about what kind of healthcare companies "must" supply and not about the insanity of government forcing companies to be health insurance suppliers in the first place shows just how far off the tracks this nation is.



Yes, this argument seems to be a red herring.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

No one is forced to work at Hobby Lobby.


and no one who works at Hobby Lobby is being forced to abstain from the use of contraceptives...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram