Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Goldman Sachs is suing Google to un-send an accidental email

Posted on 7/2/14 at 7:17 pm
Posted by hikingfan
Member since Jun 2013
1657 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 7:17 pm
quote:

It all started with an email typo. Entering a client's email address last week, a contractor accidentally swapped @gs.com for @gmail.com — so instead of sending to a Goldman Sachs employee, the message went to a random stranger.

Normally, that would just be an embarrassment, but this particular email included private client data, and Goldman Sachs is willing to move heaven and earth to get it back. According to a new report from Reuters, the battle has taken the Wall Street firm to the New York State Supreme Court, pleading with Google to delete the email to prevent a "needless and massive privacy violation," in the company's words.

It's an unprecedented demand — effectively asserting the right to unsend an email if it can be established that the email was sent in error — but Google says it's willing to comply if Goldman can get a court order to that effect. Still, it's not clear exactly what legal reasoning the bank would appeal to. Thus far, the company has relied on emergency relief claims, arguing that Google "faces little more than the minor inconvenience of intercepting a single email — an email that was indisputably sent in error," balanced against Goldman's potentially disastrous data breach.

LINK
Posted by AndyJ
Member since Jul 2008
2753 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 7:24 pm to
I'll bet the private client data is not even that important, but since GS and the intended recipient have boatloads of money, they are trying to do whatever the hell they want.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118894 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 7:46 pm to
Interesting that a firm like GS with all that confidential information would not have a safety mechanism in place to review emails before they leave their corporate servers.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39553 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 7:48 pm to
Wonder if GS ever asked nicely. This doesn't appear to be incredibly difficult for Googleto do as a one-off privately.

Might have made more trouble now that other entities have wind of this lawsuit
This post was edited on 7/2/14 at 7:49 pm
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

This doesn't appear to be incredibly difficult for Googleto do as a one-off privately.


Probably not, but they may not want to set a precedent for others.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Probably not, but they may not want to set a precedent for others.


Yep. Google sure as hell doesn't want to set the precedent that they're responsible for retrieving/deleting incorrectly sent e-mails.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27816 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Interesting that a firm like GS with all that confidential information would not have a safety mechanism in place to review emails before they leave their corporate servers.


I imagine each GS employee sends a few emails daily outside the network. I don't think that's useable.

Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39553 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Probably not, but they may not want to set a precedent for others.



Of course, but I have doubts any one would have known.

Now everybody knows they can do it and I've stopped trying to predict what a court will rule a long time ago.

But I suppose they went through the risk analysis better than I did
This post was edited on 7/2/14 at 10:10 pm
Posted by Waffle House
NYC
Member since Aug 2008
3945 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 6:19 am to
I am sort of confused about how they are going about this. Did the email go to an inactive account? Do they know if this person has even accessed the email? If the person has already accessed the email, can they be sued for saving a copy of the information that was set to them unsolicited? Ultimately, what good will having Google "unsend" the email if it has already been read?

I think it would be funny if the person already deleted the email as spam.
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 6:59 am to
quote:

I'll bet the private client data is not even that important

I got the opposite impression that it was perhaps a smoking gun about some illegal or shady deal. But then I don't have a very high opinion of GS.
Posted by Beerinthepocket
Dallas
Member since May 2011
851 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 8:39 am to
It is most likely material non-public information that an investor could use to have the upper hand on the investing public.

We've had this happen before, but never to someone outside the client organization, just the wrong person in the organization. Ex: supposed to send to BSanders@someclient.com in Finance, but it accidentally goes to BSaunders@someclient.com in HR.

Typically we'll have someone go to that persons desk and watch them delete it if the email is unable to be recalled.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram