Started By
Message
locked post

What would it take to repeal Title IX?

Posted on 6/13/14 at 10:58 pm
Posted by TigersforEver
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2008
1930 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 10:58 pm
Back in high school sociology I wrote an essay on how Title IX violates free market principles. The gist of my argument was since there's a greater demand for men's sports, schools should be free to supply accordingly.

Watching the pro hockey game tonight has me thinking about the less-mainstream sports LSU and other programs could have if it weren't for this hampering law.
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11706 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 11:00 pm to
A majority of Congress in both houses...
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72004 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 11:03 pm to
An act of Gaea.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 11:04 pm to
Question- how did this ever even pass in the first place
Posted by TigersforEver
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2008
1930 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

Question- how did this ever even pass in the first place


I'd imagine people it sounded good without considering the consequences.
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 1:01 am to
The actual wording of the law is pretty benign.

It's the perverted interpretation of the law that's the problem.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27816 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 2:57 am to
Yep. As the op mentions the interpretation assumes there are equal number of men and women wanting to participate in sports. That just isn't true.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 3:41 am to
You act like college sports actually matters.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27816 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 4:12 am to
quote:

Posted by Tigah in the ATL You act like college sports actually matters.


Scholarships. So yes it matters to those not born with a silver spoon.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 5:01 am to
quote:

I'd imagine people it sounded good without considering the consequences.


People do this all the time.

They judge an idea by its intentions and never its actual results. Liberal/Progressives and Social Conservatives are extremely guilty of this.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35883 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 7:25 am to
The intent to roughly equal men's and women's scholarship numbers as to give each sex an equal opportunity to an education doesn't seem so bad.

However, somehow that idea evolved into women's coaches in sports that lose millions if dollars hiring coaches that make 6 or 700 thousand dollars a year and assistants making 90-100 thousand a year.

The good intention was taken over by those in athletics to put all the coaches and a whole lot of admins on a gravy train resulting in huge financial implications for schools.

Instead of just an equal opportunity(a college education for women students) it became a huge business and a huge drain on college athletic dept. Now coaches get paid a ton , they have a bunch of assts and they have to travel the country too.

Title IX grew into the monster we see today.
This post was edited on 6/14/14 at 7:29 am
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:08 am to
quote:

The good intention was taken over by those in athletics to put all the coaches and a whole lot of admins on a gravy train resulting in huge financial implications for schools.

Instead of just an equal opportunity(a college education for women students) it became a huge business and a huge drain on college athletic dept.


It wasn't really the schools or athletic departments. It was women's program coaches, government bureaucrats, and federal judges that perverted the language of the statute.

They had a case a few years back where a wealthy alum of a high school wanted to donate $1 million to the school to put in a state of the art video board on the school's football field. The school couldn't accept the donation because they were told that they would then be required to spend $1 million on the girl's sports program. That's just f*cking insane.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17473 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:12 am to
Ads on jerseys?
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70851 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:16 am to
quote:

What would it take to repeal Title IX?
Back in high school sociology I wrote an essay on how Title IX violates free market principles.


Title IX applies only to educational institutions receiving government funding. The whole idea of free market principles was already out the window before Title IX became law.

It shouldn't be repealed--it's much broader than sports. It was originally aimed at universities that denied women academic scholarships, access to certain classes, or denied them admission altogether.

But we do need to reform the way it applies to sports. One way would be to modify it so net spending is a means of compliance. That way, if your football and MBB programs turn a profit, they effectively count as a negative number of men's sports. It takes into account the popularity of the program and the benefits the program provides for the institution.

If you have a who-cares men's sport that draws 20 fans a game, that's where Title IX should apply.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35883 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:36 am to
Give women roughly an equal amount of scholarships, field first class teams based on interest from Fans and TV and that should suffice.

Paying coaches 100s if thousand dollars to coach a sport that doesn't draw fans is ridiculous.
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12640 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 10:25 am to
Potty parity how is this fair, 2 to 1 for female bathrooms?

LINK

cause they change the rules and measure it on wait time.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50277 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Question- how did this ever even pass in the first place


Like all stupid social policies. It sounded reasonable at the time. People don't consider consequences.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89476 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 10:32 am to
There is a simple fix for Title IX - simple, elegant and would absolutely take out 90% of the bad associated with Title IX:

Exempt American football from the calculations.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41157 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 11:43 am to
quote:

The actual wording of the law is pretty benign.



True=
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.


quote:

It's the perverted interpretation of the law that's the problem


Short sighted conservatives never envisioned the possibility that female enrollment would exceed male enrollement when they crafted the rules. When the three prong test was put into place, everyone thought test one was a get out of jail free card.

1.Providing athletic participation opportunities that are substantially proportionate to the student enrollment. This prong of the test is satisfied when participation opportunities for men and women are "substantially proportionate" to their respective undergraduate enrollment.

2.Demonstrating a continual expansion of athletic opportunities for the underrepresented sex. This prong of the test is satisfied when an institution has a history and continuing practice of program expansion that is responsive to the developing interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex (typically female).

3.Accommodating the interest and ability of underrepresented sex. This prong of the test is satisfied when an institution is meeting the interests and abilities of its female students even where there are disproportionately fewer females than males participating in sports
.



Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112406 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 1:43 pm to
Some thoughts on Title IX.

a. Feminists prefer the word 'womyn' because 'women' has the word 'men' in it. Title IX has the word 'tit'. Where is the outrage?

b. Title IX assumes that males and females have equal interest in participating in sports. The only problem is opportunity. This is false. When given every opportunity far fewer women choose to play collegiate sports.

c. Colleges wanted to declare Cheerleading a team sport to balance their numbers. Cheerleading is competitive. They go to tournaments. There are winners and losers. It takes a lot of athletic ability. If cheerleading is not a sport then bowling is not a sport and there are college bowling teams.
Feminists shot down the idea. Why? Do they hate women? They hate the kind of women that cheerleaders represent....attractive heterosexuals.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram