anyone into Turbo vehicles?

All cars should be turbo.

Turbos increase torque, which makes a little engine feel like a big one. There's a saying that goes, "Americans buy horsepower but drive torque" and turbos help with that tremendously while bettering fuel economy. V8 torque from a 2.0L inline-4.

I went through all sorts of shite to buy the last naturally aspirated 528i. The I6 is iconic and I can't believe everything is spun up on turbos these days.

quote:

---

All cars should be turbo.

---

This. Or super charged

2002 Subaru WRX with STI mods including turbo. Amazingly fast for small engine size. Very reliable and like a lot have said, turbo charging has been around for a long time.

quote:

---

All cars should be turbo.

---

All cars should be twin turbo.
FIFY

quote:

---

Turbos (and forced induction in general) will increase the brake specific fuel consumption of the engine which it is added to.

---

Yeah - but what they're doing, Rusty, is they're turboing (and increasingly 2 turbos) 6s to feel like 8s, and hitting in between for fuel economy - similar to a bi-turbo V8 doing the job of a V12 in high end cars.

They already have normally aspirated V6s with 300 horsepower that can achieve (not that anybody drives them that way) - 30mpg - a magic number. Bi-turbo that, you can probably get to 330-350ish, with only a 15% drop in efficiency - or about 25mpg (again, driving it like a grandmother most of the time).

Combined with engine stop technology, a 560 (turbocharged) horsepower engine can claim (for CAFE standards) 20mpg combined, 17 city, 24 hwy (2014 Porsche Turbo S).

With the steady increase in fuel prices, turbos are a smart way to increase MPG while retaining the size of our American automobiles.

On a side note, I wish small trucks with turbo 4 cylinder engines were available in the US.

quote:

---

What Wikipedia here is trying to say is more air equals more power in a nutshell.

---

No, that isn't at all what I said.

quote:

---

The air being forced into the engine is great for power

---

Yes.

quote:

---

and efficiency

---

Greater volumetric efficiency. Lower thermal efficiency

Ace cleared up the point of contention though. What ATL meant is that turbos enable smaller engines to achieve similar performance while getting better mileage than if the same performance were achieved by increasing displacement.

quote:

---

They already have normally aspirated V6s with 300 horsepower that can achieve (not that anybody drives them that way) - 30mpg - a magic number. Bi-turbo that, you can probably get to 330-350ish, with only a 15% drop in efficiency - or about 25mpg

---

That is the point I was making. Putting turbos on an engine will lower your fuel economy, not increase it.

But anyway, more to the OP's point: Turbo cars are kings of the street as far as performance is concerned. Build the engine's bottom end to be bullet proof and all you have to do is feed it boost and fuel. There are vehicles with well over 1000 wheel horsepower driving around on pump gas (and maybe water or meth injection at that power level). As far as reliability...well the old saying goes:

1. Fast
2. Reliable
3. Cheap

Pick two.