- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did the GOP Just Set the Table for Rand Paul?
Posted on 5/14/14 at 9:55 am
Posted on 5/14/14 at 9:55 am
Daily Beast
Interesting. I thought many of you would enjoy.
quote:
A bit of advice for Republican establishment types: Stockpile your Valium for March 2016.
That’s because the Republican National Committee codified a presidential primary schedule this month that requires Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada to hold their votes first. And Republicans from both inside and outside the establishment wing of the party say that calendar will provide a huge advantage to Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and his legion of Tea Party acolytes.
But those same ties give Paul an advantage in three of the early primary states, and if the senator were to win or even put together a decent showing there, Republicans say he may have momentum that is impossible to slow. No Republican has won Iowa and New Hampshire and failed to win the nomination.
“If Rand were to win two of those first three or three of those first four, he would be a train gathering a lot of steam,” said Matt Mackowiak, a Texas-based Republican consultant and a veteran of George W. Bush’s reelection campaign. Such a string, Mackowiak added, would raise a number of questions for party chairs and donors.
...
“He already has his team in place in Iowa,” said Chris LaCivita, a Republican strategist who worked on Paul’s 2010 Senate bid. “I don’t know too many presidential candidates who can say that in May of 2014.”
In independent-minded New Hampshire, Paul is thought to be a better fit with Republican voters, and he is leading in a series of early polls in the state, even besting New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte and the better-known Jeb Bush.
In Nevada, a caucus system allows for candidates with a superior organization to upset more mainstream opponents. In 2008, for example, Romney was in fifth place in polls heading into Election Day and went on to win. One GOP strategist associated with the party’s establishment told The Daily Beast that while Nevada can be something of a “jump ball,” Paul should have such an advantage there that “it would be surprising to even see the other candidates campaign much.”
Interesting. I thought many of you would enjoy.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 9:58 am to a want
Nice. He's the clear choice if the Republicans want to compete for the presidency.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:01 am to a want
I can't wait to see Karl Rove and Sean Hannity go into full meltdown mode, then turn around and support him unconditionally against anyone with a D behind their name.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:07 am to upgrayedd
quote:
I can't wait to see Karl Rove and Sean Hannity go into full meltdown mode, then turn around and support him unconditionally against anyone with a D behind their name.
Because Hillary's people just LOVED Obama until he got the nomination...
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:09 am to udtiger
quote:
Because Hillary's people just LOVED Obama until he got the nomination...
I think that had more to do with him taking away what they saw as her birthright, not necessarily his political beliefs.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:09 am to upgrayedd
quote:
I can't wait to see Karl Rove and Sean Hannity go into full meltdown mode
Both will throw their full support behind Rand should he receive the nomination.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:10 am to upgrayedd
So if Paul gets the nomination conservatives should support Hillary?
Or stay home?
Or stay home?
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:11 am to a want
GOP needs to get the frick out of the way and let Rand do his thing... Only shot they have at 2016.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:14 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
So if Paul gets the nomination conservatives should support Hillary?
Or stay home?
No, I merely stated that it's going to be funny to watch them bash Paul and say that he, in no way, represents conservatives and America like, say, Rick Santorum and he wants this country to turn into some European socialist paradise. Then, if he wins the nomination, they'll say he's the best candidate since George Washington.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:14 am to Lsut81
He probably is the only shot for the GOP, and if Hillary picks someone like Cory Booker as her VP choice, even Rand has not shot.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:19 am to DeltaDoc
there is no stopping Hilldawg
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:21 am to Samso
quote:
there is no stopping Hilldawg
That was the popular opinion going into 2008 also.
This post was edited on 5/14/14 at 10:22 am
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:24 am to upgrayedd
Have they ever supported Santorium?
Your post is incomprehensible.
Your post is incomprehensible.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:26 am to ChineseBandit58
Will be interesting to see who Rand's running mate would be...
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:29 am to a want
Is Rand Paul really that popular with the Tea Party folks? I always viewed him as the darling of the "libertarian" faction of the GOP, while Cruz was the Tea Party darling.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 10:53 am to The Spleen
quote:
Is Rand Paul really that popular with the Tea Party folks?
Yes.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:04 am to a want
quote:
a want
you're rather GOP-obsessed
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:05 am to Lsut81
quote:
Will be interesting to see who Rand's running mate would be...
A Rand Paul/Susanna Martinez ticket would be tough out
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:08 am to Circle K Beggar
quote:
you're rather GOP-obsessed
Huh?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News