Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

archer gone

Posted on 5/9/14 at 10:12 pm
Posted by uptowntiger84
uptown
Member since Jul 2011
3882 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 10:12 pm
pittsburgh steelers with their compensetory 97th pick
Posted by TIGERSby10
Central Lafourche
Member since Nov 2005
6913 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 9:29 am to
We don't need Archer now that we have Cooks. They can use Cooks just like Archer would have been used.
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
9373 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 9:31 am to
quote:

We don't need Archer now that we have Cooks. They can use Cooks just like Archer would have been used.


+More.

Notable that DAT is still available.. I would not be opposed. People are talking about Cooks replacing Sproles production, but we would be in crazy good shape if DAT replaced Sproles production and Cooks created his own.

Just saying. More likely we take a C or LB but I could see CSP saying "I want ALL the toys!"
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52528 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 9:38 am to
I don't understand why some people wanted this kid so badly. I understand he could have been a darren sproles kind of guy, but I hated how we used sproles, we were do dependent on those stupid play calls. I think we were better offensively without him.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram