- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why wasn't Nadal Hassan's Fort Hood killings a hate crime?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 4/14/14 at 5:53 pm
He screamed Alluah Akbar before gunning down a dozen military personel at Fort Hood. Sounds to me like he hated those who weren't Muslim.
Why wasn't Hassan's spree considered a hate crime, but the Jewish center shooting yesterday is?
Why wasn't Hassan's spree considered a hate crime, but the Jewish center shooting yesterday is?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 5:55 pm to goldennugget
Because we have racist President and a racist AG.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 5:55 pm to goldennugget
Elections, and no terrorist threat on our soil...plain as day why they covered up the real cause, as work place violence..Same way they tried to blame a video on Benghazi...
Posted on 4/14/14 at 5:56 pm to goldennugget
Do you even workplace violence, bro?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 5:58 pm to NC_Tigah
The question you should be asking is why it was not labeled an act of terror. It clearly was.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:03 pm to asurob1
Exactly who made the determination as to it being not a hate crime or terrorism?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:03 pm to asurob1
God help the person who doesn't know why Obama didn't call it an act of terror.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:04 pm to KCT
quote:
God help the person who doesn't know why Obama didn't call it an act of terror.
They obviously want to be on the wrong side of history.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:04 pm to asurob1
quote:#workplaceviolence
The question you should be asking is why it was not labeled an act of terror
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:06 pm to asurob1
quote:
The question you should be asking is why it was not labeled an act of terror. It clearly was.
Yep, and the tragedy to the survivors benefits suffer from the lie...Another Obama lie, that no one can refute.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:08 pm to upgrayedd
How was that TPOS allowed to be an Officer in the United States Army ... even after all the warning signs were there that he was a wacko?
I'll tell you how ... Political Correctness.
Too many people, in uniform or otherwise ... afraid to friggin' tell it like it is nowadays.
And, I don't pretend that "fear" of speaking out doesn't affect me as well.
Because people who speak out end up being labeled, at best.
That is Our Country now.
I'll tell you how ... Political Correctness.
Too many people, in uniform or otherwise ... afraid to friggin' tell it like it is nowadays.
And, I don't pretend that "fear" of speaking out doesn't affect me as well.
Because people who speak out end up being labeled, at best.
That is Our Country now.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:25 pm to KCT
KCT you hit the nail on the head. Really right on target.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:33 pm to asurob1
quote:
The question you should be asking is why it was not labeled an act of terror. It clearly was.
Agreed. Just an off the cuff question for you seeing how you're an ex military man. Do you think all military personnel, if they so desire, should be able to possess side arms while on base?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News