Started By
Message

dumb marathon question

Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:19 am
Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7806 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:19 am
I have a question to your marathon runners:

1st dumb question- is it actually a race?

2nd dumb question- since you don't all start at the exact same time, how do you know who wins the race? is someone keeping official times on each individual there?


I know shite about marathons. just curious.
Posted by TigerRob20
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2008
3732 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:20 am to
Yes and yes. They have tags in each running bib that work with the time clock to track each person.
Posted by BayouBandit24
Member since Aug 2010
16548 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:21 am to
It's only really a "race" for a few people. Most are just focused on finishing, however long that might take.
Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7806 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Yes and yes. They have tags in each running bib that work with the time clock to track each person.


bingo. thanks. this surely clears it up for me.

Posted by Chris Farley
Regulating
Member since Sep 2009
4180 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:22 am to
Anyone that has a chance of winning is given priority starting status. You won't see any Ethiopians 100 people deep at the start line.
Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7806 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:23 am to
is there usually a big purse for the winner?
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76173 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:42 am to
How do they decide what people have a chance to win?
Posted by NC17
Member since Feb 2010
2772 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:43 am to
A lot of people just want to finish. Then they try it again to better their time. Marathons are grueling events. Your body hits a wall between 17 and 20 miles. At that point you're running on guts and will power. I've run a bunch and my best time was 2:46. I don't recommend them for anybody.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68266 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 8:58 am to
quote:

I don't recommend them for anybody. 


quote:

I've run a bunch


dont follow your own advice?
Posted by NC17
Member since Feb 2010
2772 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:11 am to
I don't run any more. It was about running a Boston Marathon qualifying time. And then maybe Boston. In running you pretty much go from one injury to the next. You put your body through a lot running those things. For most it's just torture and not fun.
Posted by Casty McBoozer
your mom's fat arse
Member since Sep 2005
35495 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:16 am to
quote:

How do they decide what people have a chance to win?

Previous race results.
Posted by Im4datigers
Northern Virginia
Member since Oct 2003
4461 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:19 am to
quote:

. I've run a bunch and my best time was 2:46. I don't recommend them for anybody.


Nice back door brag......
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68266 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:19 am to
gotcha

ive never understood running. ive played sportsnmy whole life and love the physical activity, but running just to run- no thanks.
Posted by oilfieldtiger
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Dec 2003
2904 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:20 am to
the tags/timing chips also register at checkpoints/timing stations along the way to confirm you actually covered the route.

for triathlons the chip is secured to a velcro strap you wear on your ankle.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58099 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:20 am to
quote:

How do they decide what people have a chance to win?


Anyone who really has a chance at all to win a marathon will have been very competitive in a previous race and will turn in race results to allow them to be able to start with the elite runners.
Hell, even your very big 10-K races around the country do this.
Posted by NC17
Member since Feb 2010
2772 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:33 am to
Not really bragging about that time. My 10K was around 33ish. So my marathon time wasn't so great.
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
20257 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:35 am to
I've run numerous 5k's but nothing more. I'm training for a half marathon around January. I don't know if I'll ever get the bug to go any further than that. If you're an experienced runner though, would like 1 full a year be too much? 
Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7806 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:36 am to
do you think that runners have "advanced" their risk of knee/hip replacements at a later age? shouldn't riding a bike be better for you?
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64088 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:40 am to
Not at all. My mom did one full a year from ages 63-68
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64088 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:42 am to
And yes. You definitely increase your risk for oa later in life. Although my mom has run 5+ miles a day, for 40+ years and only has symptomatic oa in her hands.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram