- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
My problem with anti-regulation [read: GOP]
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:57 am
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:57 am
..is that they often appear to favor business and $$$$ at the expense of the health and welfare of The People. Information like this perpetuates that image.
a few excerpts
LINK
quote:
The Republican Street Fight Over Transparency in Government
Several in the GOP want to stop a request for scientists to disclose financial conflicts in their research. What good reason could they possibly have?
a few excerpts
quote:
No one better understands the dangers in conflicted science than the chief administrator of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, David Michaels. Michaels is an epidemiologist and a professor (on leave) from George Washington University. In 2008, he published a terrifyingly depressing account of the consequences of conflicted science, Doubt is Their Product. That title was drawn from the famous 1969 Brown & Williamson memo declaring “doubt is our product, since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’ [linking smoking with cancer] that exists in the mind of the general public.” The strategy of the tobacco industry was to use “science” to attack science, so as to generate skepticism about whether smoking cigarettes caused cancer.
Yet while the history of the abuse of tobacco research is well known, too many seem to think that the corruption it manifested was, or is, limited to tobacco. Michaels’ book showed it was not: that the same strategies perfected by the tobacco industry both predate and postdate the tobacco controversy. Indeed, the very same firms hire themselves out to a string of industries threatened with regulation because of the safety threats alleged to be caused by their products. From lead (in 1965, the American Petroleum Institute stated that “all ‘accepted medical evidence . . .proves conclusively’ that lead in the environment presents no threat to public health”) to chromium-6 (in 1976, OSHA determined a “comprehensive occupational health standard is urgently needed”; 30 years later, the regulation was completed, with the delay caused in part by studies “funded in part by” the industry regulated), to countless other other examples, regulators have repeatedly faced mountains of “data” produced by “scientists” hired by industries threatened with regulation. That barrage slowed the government’s response to problems we all now concede were actually problems, while earning the threatened industries years of additional blood profit.
quote:
The public interest is clear. We all rely on the advice of doctors, and leading researchers influence the practice of medicine. Taxpayers spend billions of dollars each year on prescription drugs and devices through Medicare and Medicaid. The National Institutes of Health distributes $24 billion annually in federal research grants. So the public has a right to know about financial relationships between doctors and drug companies.
LINK
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 10:58 am
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:58 am to BobBoucher
quote:
anti-regulation [read: GOP]
Posted on 3/27/14 at 10:58 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Y.A. Tittle
...just so theres no confusion.
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:01 am to BobBoucher
quote:
anti-regulation [read: GOP
When did the GOP become anti regulation? This is certainly news to sane people.
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:07 am to BobBoucher
Glad you capitalized The People.
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:45 am to BobBoucher
A) You are incorrectly saying that the GOP is anti-regulation. Don't forget Clinton deregulated the banking industry to allow for the moral hazard that led to the financial crisis of 2007/2008.
B) Regulations are killing small businesses. The little guy. It costs over $1M for a taxi license in New York City now. It costs over $100k to operate a fricking hot dog cart in NYC.
businesses are literally closing their doors.
And it's not just the food services industry, it's shite like healthcare. You try to pay back 10 years in student loans and make a profit with shitty medicare/medicaid reimbursements after paying for massive technology upgrades and malpractice insurance.
As other evidence, you need a license to be an interior designer to pick out fricking pillows for people.
Is it important to you to have every product you buy made by some giant conglomerate that only cares about profit margins or do you want to even have small businesses in this country?
Why do you hate the little guy?
B) Regulations are killing small businesses. The little guy. It costs over $1M for a taxi license in New York City now. It costs over $100k to operate a fricking hot dog cart in NYC.
businesses are literally closing their doors.
And it's not just the food services industry, it's shite like healthcare. You try to pay back 10 years in student loans and make a profit with shitty medicare/medicaid reimbursements after paying for massive technology upgrades and malpractice insurance.
As other evidence, you need a license to be an interior designer to pick out fricking pillows for people.
Is it important to you to have every product you buy made by some giant conglomerate that only cares about profit margins or do you want to even have small businesses in this country?
Why do you hate the little guy?
Posted on 3/27/14 at 11:55 am to BobBoucher
Republicans aren't against regulation. They are against idiotic regulation that doesn't solve the original problem, creates new problems that didn't exist before, and makes everything more expensive.
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:43 pm to ironsides
quote:
Why do you hate the little guy?
i dont hate the little guy. I hate people who have no morals that have no problem operating a knowlingly destructive business to make a buck while intentionally trying to hide it. Oh, and i hate the politicians that protect them to make a buck. Most often those are republicans (my impression, that is - i have absolutely nothing to back that up other than observation/impression over time).
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:46 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
..is that they often appear to favor business and $$$$ at the expense of the health and welfare of The People.
But Obama giving away $85 billion a month for the past five years in QE money doesn't appear that way?
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:49 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
Oh, and i hate the politicians that protect them to make a buck. Most often those are republicans (my impression, that is
I can't believe you posted that. It's one thing to be ignorant, it's another to admit it publicly.
Why do you think so many true liberals are pissed at the current administration?
Posted on 3/27/14 at 1:07 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
I hate people who have no morals that have no problem operating a knowlingly destructive business to make a buck while intentionally trying to hide it.
So you're against Obamacare?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News