Started By
Message
locked post

Thoughts On Obama Giving Up Control Of Internet

Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:04 am
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:04 am
What are your thoughts on this scenario?

LINK
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:11 am to
Proof of Idiocy is the first one. Proof that other nations will be able to control web content(read censorship or disinformation distribution) world wide when they choose to do so for their gain. The UN will definitely love it as it will be to them an extension of control of matters of international relations.
Posted by SG_Geaux
1 Post
Member since Aug 2004
77913 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:31 am to
Horribly, horribly, HORRIBLY fricking stupid.

It is the information age. Who ever has a hand in controlling the information has a HUUGE advantage, and we just gave away that advantage.

All part of Obama's plan to weaken/destroy the United States at every turn.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 9:33 am
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:32 am to
Just another stupid step towards Obama's New World Order.
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2576 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:35 am to
Worse than the reset button...
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:39 am to
Carter gave the Panama Canal away, so BHO Jangles had to do his part.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28332 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:39 am to
Guy is a reckless buffoon......every day the stupidity of this countries citizens absolutely blow me away.
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:46 am to
You can always rely on Fox to give the daily "2 Minutes Hate".

That headline is priceless (in it's mis-repesentation of reality).
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57211 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:52 am to
quote:

You can always rely on Fox to give the daily "2 Minutes Hate".

That headline is priceless (in it's mis-repesentation of reality).


Then clarify it for him
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18048 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:54 am to
This will make other people in the world like us.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:07 am to
Check one of the threads from a week or so ago.

Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:09 am to
The rest of the world doesn't trust the NSA running the internet and I don't either.
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:11 am to
A Want, what is the reality of the situation? No flame...
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:15 am to
quote:

The rest of the world doesn't trust the NSA running the internet and I don't either.


the Commerce Department's control of ICANN + the NSA running the internet? wow. the uninformed are running rampant nowadays.

Guess you long for the fantasy world of the "international community" jointly controlling the internet. Can't wait until Russia, China and Venezuela get to decide what web addresses get to stay and which ones need to go!
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:39 am to
Its not giving up control over the internet.

It's a system by which domain names are sold/issued and it has been a terribly flawed and inefficient system in the past.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Its not giving up control over the internet.

It's a system by which domain names are sold/issued


Man. If only facts didn't get in the way of your claims.

From the ICANN web site:

quote:

What Does ICANN Do?
To reach another person on the Internet you have to type an address into your computer -- a name or a number. That address must be unique so computers know where to find each other. ICANN coordinates these unique identifiers across the world. Without that coordination, we wouldn't have one global Internet.

In more technical terms, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) coordinates the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions, which are key technical services critical to the continued operations of the Internet's underlying address book, the Domain Name System (DNS). The IANA functions include: (1) the coordination of the assignment of technical protocol parameters including the management of the address and routing parameter area (ARPA) top-level domain; (2) the administration of certain responsibilities associated with Internet DNS root zone management such as generic (gTLD) and country code (ccTLD) Top-Level Domains; (3) the allocation of Internet numbering resources; and (4) other services. ICANN performs the IANA functions under a U.S. Government contract.


quote:

and it has been a terribly flawed and inefficient system in the past.


Not sure which internet you've been using, but I can access pretty much any type of content I want to without pause. Wonder if Cuba would be so kind as to grant me access to a web site dedicated to the dissident movement?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51416 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:06 am to
quote:

it has been a terribly flawed and inefficient system in the past


Going on a premise that this would be the extent of control loss, how has it been terribly flawed and inefficient and how would this change fix it?
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Man. If only facts didn't get in the way of your claims.



I am speaking factually. Nothing you quoted disputes what I said. The problem is that you lack the technical expertise to even discuss the matter.

quote:

Not sure which internet you've been using, but I can access pretty much any type of content I want to without pause


That's great, and also irrelevant. You likely never actually hit an ICANN server when browsing the web. When I type a URL, my computer looks to google servers for root hints. Those root hints help find the private DNS servers that hold information needed to direct a URL to a server's IP address. I won't get into authoritative name servers, delegation, and NOC's, because it's really beside the point.

quote:

Wonder if Cuba would be so kind as to grant me access to a web site dedicated to the dissident movement?


Good grief. :roll eyes: Has nothing to do with ICANN. Cuba will never control ICANN. Cuba can control domestic access to websites via domestic ISPs or backbones, as any government can.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 11:22 am
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Going on a premise that this would be the extent of control loss, how has it been terribly flawed and inefficient and how would this change fix it?


I would put more emphasis on creating parity between some of the generic TLDs.
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:12 am to
What you quoted is the same thing he said.

The idea that the Obama admin "controls" it is ridiculous. It's another dog whistle for Fox viewers to be outraged over.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram