- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jimmy Graham's Response
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:57 pm to purplepylon
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:57 pm to purplepylon
quote:
People who criticize a man for making a joke on Twitter need to get off Twitter and/or this site for a month. You are too angry to be able to enjoy things
YEP!
1
Posted on 3/25/14 at 6:27 pm to beauchristopher
this thread is a perfect example of what happens when they're is nothing else to talk about
frick Atlanta and frick their goalposts... he could have brought down the building Metrodome style and I wouldn't have cared one bit
frick Atlanta and frick their goalposts... he could have brought down the building Metrodome style and I wouldn't have cared one bit
Posted on 3/25/14 at 6:29 pm to MrExclusive
Any lame attacks on JG for that tweet are lame.
JG was lame for hangin on the rim.
The NFL was lame for banning any thing BUT hangin on the rim.
Its taco night.
JG was lame for hangin on the rim.
The NFL was lame for banning any thing BUT hangin on the rim.
Its taco night.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 6:35 pm to goatmilker
funny you say that, the ol lady is making tacos right now... I can't wait to get off of work
Posted on 3/25/14 at 6:53 pm to shel311
quote:
still avoiding my point, again, not a sign of a good poster.
Sounds like you're boxed in and have no answer so you're doing whatever you can to not reply to my point. Twice now.
Feel free to respond to my actual point anytime now.
I'm pretty sure "your point" has been beaten into the ground and obliterated at every angle possible over the last month. No need to get so e-defensive
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:48 pm to Pendulum
quote:L
No need to get so e-defensive
O
L
this thread has delivered over and over again
quote:I'm 100% certain it hasn't.
I'm pretty sure "your point" has been beaten into the ground and obliterated at every angle possible over the last month
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:49 pm to shel311
what exactly was your point?
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:55 pm to MrExclusive
quote:people want athletes to do things they themselves would never never do.
what exactly was your point?
That was one of em but feel free to read the posts I made in this thread if you wish.
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:03 pm to shel311
quote:
I'm 100% certain it hasn't.
The 4000 previous jimmy graham threads disagree with you.
Oh and LOLOLOL, deflection at it's finest
quote:
You might wanna recheck your numbers there chief
which garners this response.
quote:
Glossing over my overriding point because you know I'm right, nice try there boss.
I said 7 vs 12 is half as much. Oh the horror!!!!!!
Be better at posting.
Yep, you are e-defensive MVP.
L
O
L
O
L
delivered
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:06 pm to Pendulum
quote:not at all
The 4000 previous jimmy graham threads disagree with you.
quote:What?
Oh and LOLOLOL, deflection at it's finest
You're making zero sense, sorry.
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:10 pm to shel311
do you think gravity pull everyone upwards instead of downwards?
How can you even argue that every single view of every angle of every quantitative opinion has been discussed ad nauseam.
Are you serious or trolling, I'ma vote trolling bc you seem to want someone to disagree with you judging from your empty e-defensive responses
How can you even argue that every single view of every angle of every quantitative opinion has been discussed ad nauseam.
Are you serious or trolling, I'ma vote trolling bc you seem to want someone to disagree with you judging from your empty e-defensive responses
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:15 pm to Hoodoo Man
quote:
I'm gonna start calling you "Gee Wilikers."
Nah, 1992? Call him Curley Hallman
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:15 pm to Pendulum
Good times. You seem to be entrenched in some odd odd stance, so I won't even bother pointing out where you went astray.
Nice try, but you "obliterated" your own point.
Nice try, but you "obliterated" your own point.
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:20 pm to shel311
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:28 pm to shel311
My stance is you post like a 15 yo wanting to fight with everyone. Half your responses in this thread are some type of attempt at a personal attack (via the internet which makes it ridiculous and "e-defensive") or seem to be made with complete ignorance to the post you are responding to.
Example:
So I obliterated my own point that every opinion on the jimmy situation has been discussed to the bitter end of the earth already (FACT) so there's no need to come into this thread about the goal post rule and dredge it up; following it up subsequently with responses containing attacks and little substance(the main reason you drew my attention)?
Like, I obliterated my own point; wtf does that even mean.
A good debate is what makes forums tick, and posters like you ruin that.
Example:
quote:
Nice try, but you "obliterated" your own point.
So I obliterated my own point that every opinion on the jimmy situation has been discussed to the bitter end of the earth already (FACT) so there's no need to come into this thread about the goal post rule and dredge it up; following it up subsequently with responses containing attacks and little substance(the main reason you drew my attention)?
Like, I obliterated my own point; wtf does that even mean.
A good debate is what makes forums tick, and posters like you ruin that.
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:34 pm to Pendulum
quote:breesus ruined it before, and you're just picking up where he left off.
A good debate is what makes forums tick, and posters like you ruin that.
If you can't see and pick up the obvious of what you're completely missing it's not my job to hold your hand and walk you through it, you're on your own there. If you missed it, so be it ,move on.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:57 pm to shel311
I'm gonna stop myself before I continue trying to argue with pure ignorance. Your defense seems to mainly involve statements which are not really saying anything at all, or rofl emoticons.
I'll leave you to the train wreck.
The sad part is I actually agree with your view on the contract negotiations. If I were Jimmy, I'd want 25 million, screw just 12.
I'll leave you to the train wreck.
The sad part is I actually agree with your view on the contract negotiations. If I were Jimmy, I'd want 25 million, screw just 12.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:58 pm to Pendulum
We need some actual news before this board implodes.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:35 pm to shel311
quote:
breesus ruined it before, and you're just picking up where he left off.
how did i ruin it? you're the one who started calling me a shitty poster and whatnot
i just responded to your points.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 5:59 am to Breesus
quote:To pull a page out of your posting playbook, I never called you a shitty poster. you might wanna check the posts and get your facts right, chief.
you're the one who started calling me a shitty poster and whatnot
I think I did it right. Ignored the points, found 1 slight, tiny difference in what you said to exploit, and threw in a "chief" at the end. I think I did well by your standards.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 6:03 am
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News