Started By
Message
locked post

Gay activists have met their match with Muslim barbers.

Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:23 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118626 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:23 pm
This is in Canada.
LINK
quote:

But in the case of the Muslim barbers, the gay activists have met their match. If the test is who can be the most offended or most politically correct, a lesbian’s just not going to cut it.

Oh, McGregor is politically correct. But just not politically correct enough. It’s like poker.

A white, Christian male has the lowest hand — it’s like he’s got just one high card, maybe an ace. So almost everyone trumps him.

A white woman is just a bit higher — like a pair of twos. Enough to beat a white man, but not much more.

A gay man is like having two pairs in poker.

A gay woman — a lesbian like McGregor — is like having three of a kind.

A black lesbian is a full house — pretty tough to beat.

Unless she’s also in a wheelchair, which means she’s pretty much a straight flush.

The only person who could trump that would be a royal flush. If the late Sammy Davis Jr. — who was black, Jewish and half-blind — were to convert to Islam and discover he was 1/64th Aboriginal.

So which is a better hand: A lesbian who wants a haircut or a Muslim who doesn’t want to give it to her?

I’m betting on Mahrouk. And I predict that Muslim activists — not quiet barbers like Mahrouk, but professional Muslim busybodies — will start using human rights commissions more and more to push their way into places where they have no legal right, but where the human rights commissions are more than happy to engineer things for them, if they complain loud enough.

If I were a gay activist, I’d probably want to declare victory and shut down these human rights commissions right now.

In five years time, it won’t be gay activists forcing themselves into Christian B&Bs. It’ll be Muslim activists vetoing the gay pride parade.

Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:29 pm to
Sounds like you're rooting for the Muslims. Amazing how the poli board has come full circle




















oh yeah, you're a pathetic human being
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118626 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:31 pm to
Presumptuous much?


BTW, I'm rooting for freedom.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

BTW, I'm rooting for freedom.


Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118626 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:34 pm to
So you find it funny when people are forced by government to provide a service against their will?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:36 pm to
What i find funny is that some want to legalize discrimination under the guise of "freedom". And even worse they are hiding behind religion to do it.

These exact same arguments were made against african americans. You are on the wrong side of history and you will be judged harshly.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118626 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

These exact same arguments were made against african americans.


The moral equivalence of the "gay struggle" to civil rights is laughable.


quote:

You are on the wrong side of history and you will be judged harshly.



Yeah this is something that keeps me up at night.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:45 pm to
quote:


The moral equivalence of the "gay struggle" to civil rights is laughable.


That's what I would expect you to say and of course you're completely wrong. Maybe in the deep south thats the view but the rest of America sees this as just another issue that our part of the country has wrong. It's embarrassing really.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58089 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:46 pm to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118626 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

That's what I would expect you to say and of course you're completely wrong. Maybe in the deep south thats the view but the rest of America sees this as just another issue that our part of the country has wrong.


Precisely what was determined to be wrong?

When was this determination made?

How does this relate to the south specifically? I'm a little confused here on the geography because did not the bakery deal take place in a northern state and the apparently anti-gay religious freedom legislation ordeal was in AZ.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421289 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

That's what I would expect you to say and of course you're completely wrong

what group is next? after homosexuals?

honest question
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

what group is next? after homosexuals?

honest question



I'll tell you as soon as you tell me who will win the world series in 2035.

The court addressed this issue (albeit somewhat weakly) in Windsor. I don't anticipate most of these clowns on here to be able to sit through that but I would have expected more from you.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421289 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

I'll tell you as soon as you tell me who will win the world series in 2035.

that makes no sense

i'm not asking you to predict the future. the "next" group exists right now as we speak. it's not an unknown future variable

quote:

The court addressed this issue (albeit somewhat weakly) in Windsor. I don't anticipate most of these clowns on here to be able to sit through that but I would have expected more from you.


any group trying to gain super-legal protections won't have a court case for probably a decade or so. it takes time

...but they exist now, and without your current support you're hurting their shot at freedom!
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421289 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:02 pm to
and before i get called a bigot, i was at a wedding last night where the best man was a lesbian female
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
9298 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:08 pm to
He didn't write the article. How does that make him worthless?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118626 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

the "next" group exists right now as we speak. it's not an unknown future variable



Okay, who are you talking about? NAMBLA? Polygamist? Trannies?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421289 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Okay, who are you talking about? NAMBLA? Polygamist? Trannies?

my money is on fat people
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

that makes no sense

i'm not asking you to predict the future. the "next" group exists right now as we speak. it's not an unknown future variable



The team that will win the world series in 2035 probably exists right now too.

You're asking me to predict future legal outcomes. That's about the same as asking me who will win the world series in some future year.


quote:

...but they exist now, and without your current support you're hurting their shot at freedom!



:omg:
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421289 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

The team that will win the world series in 2035 probably exists right now too.

no it doesn't. hell some of the players may not even be born yet

how many current MLB players will be playing in 2035? (this is obviously ignoring putting them all together)

quote:

You're asking me to predict future legal outcomes.

no i'm not

i'm asking you to name which group of people will be the next oppressed grouping of people lobbying for social acceptance and super-legal preference/protection
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118626 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

my money is on fat people


Hmmm. Do you mean claiming "discrimination" in terms of physically inaccessible places due to their size?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram