- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gay activists have met their match with Muslim barbers.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:23 pm
This is in Canada.
LINK
LINK
quote:
But in the case of the Muslim barbers, the gay activists have met their match. If the test is who can be the most offended or most politically correct, a lesbian’s just not going to cut it.
Oh, McGregor is politically correct. But just not politically correct enough. It’s like poker.
A white, Christian male has the lowest hand — it’s like he’s got just one high card, maybe an ace. So almost everyone trumps him.
A white woman is just a bit higher — like a pair of twos. Enough to beat a white man, but not much more.
A gay man is like having two pairs in poker.
A gay woman — a lesbian like McGregor — is like having three of a kind.
A black lesbian is a full house — pretty tough to beat.
Unless she’s also in a wheelchair, which means she’s pretty much a straight flush.
The only person who could trump that would be a royal flush. If the late Sammy Davis Jr. — who was black, Jewish and half-blind — were to convert to Islam and discover he was 1/64th Aboriginal.
So which is a better hand: A lesbian who wants a haircut or a Muslim who doesn’t want to give it to her?
I’m betting on Mahrouk. And I predict that Muslim activists — not quiet barbers like Mahrouk, but professional Muslim busybodies — will start using human rights commissions more and more to push their way into places where they have no legal right, but where the human rights commissions are more than happy to engineer things for them, if they complain loud enough.
If I were a gay activist, I’d probably want to declare victory and shut down these human rights commissions right now.
In five years time, it won’t be gay activists forcing themselves into Christian B&Bs. It’ll be Muslim activists vetoing the gay pride parade.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:29 pm to GumboPot
Sounds like you're rooting for the Muslims. Amazing how the poli board has come full circle
oh yeah, you're a pathetic human being
oh yeah, you're a pathetic human being
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Presumptuous much?
BTW, I'm rooting for freedom.
BTW, I'm rooting for freedom.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:32 pm to GumboPot
quote:
BTW, I'm rooting for freedom.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:34 pm to Draconian Sanctions
So you find it funny when people are forced by government to provide a service against their will?
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:36 pm to GumboPot
What i find funny is that some want to legalize discrimination under the guise of "freedom". And even worse they are hiding behind religion to do it.
These exact same arguments were made against african americans. You are on the wrong side of history and you will be judged harshly.
These exact same arguments were made against african americans. You are on the wrong side of history and you will be judged harshly.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:41 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
These exact same arguments were made against african americans.
The moral equivalence of the "gay struggle" to civil rights is laughable.
quote:
You are on the wrong side of history and you will be judged harshly.
Yeah this is something that keeps me up at night.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:45 pm to GumboPot
quote:
The moral equivalence of the "gay struggle" to civil rights is laughable.
That's what I would expect you to say and of course you're completely wrong. Maybe in the deep south thats the view but the rest of America sees this as just another issue that our part of the country has wrong. It's embarrassing really.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:51 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
That's what I would expect you to say and of course you're completely wrong. Maybe in the deep south thats the view but the rest of America sees this as just another issue that our part of the country has wrong.
Precisely what was determined to be wrong?
When was this determination made?
How does this relate to the south specifically? I'm a little confused here on the geography because did not the bakery deal take place in a northern state and the apparently anti-gay religious freedom legislation ordeal was in AZ.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:51 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
That's what I would expect you to say and of course you're completely wrong
what group is next? after homosexuals?
honest question
Posted on 3/1/14 at 8:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
what group is next? after homosexuals?
honest question
I'll tell you as soon as you tell me who will win the world series in 2035.
The court addressed this issue (albeit somewhat weakly) in Windsor. I don't anticipate most of these clowns on here to be able to sit through that but I would have expected more from you.
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:01 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I'll tell you as soon as you tell me who will win the world series in 2035.
that makes no sense
i'm not asking you to predict the future. the "next" group exists right now as we speak. it's not an unknown future variable
quote:
The court addressed this issue (albeit somewhat weakly) in Windsor. I don't anticipate most of these clowns on here to be able to sit through that but I would have expected more from you.
any group trying to gain super-legal protections won't have a court case for probably a decade or so. it takes time
...but they exist now, and without your current support you're hurting their shot at freedom!
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
and before i get called a bigot, i was at a wedding last night where the best man was a lesbian female
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:08 pm to Draconian Sanctions
He didn't write the article. How does that make him worthless?
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the "next" group exists right now as we speak. it's not an unknown future variable
Okay, who are you talking about? NAMBLA? Polygamist? Trannies?
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:08 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Okay, who are you talking about? NAMBLA? Polygamist? Trannies?
my money is on fat people
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
that makes no sense
i'm not asking you to predict the future. the "next" group exists right now as we speak. it's not an unknown future variable
The team that will win the world series in 2035 probably exists right now too.
You're asking me to predict future legal outcomes. That's about the same as asking me who will win the world series in some future year.
quote:
...but they exist now, and without your current support you're hurting their shot at freedom!
:omg:
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:10 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
The team that will win the world series in 2035 probably exists right now too.
no it doesn't. hell some of the players may not even be born yet
how many current MLB players will be playing in 2035? (this is obviously ignoring putting them all together)
quote:
You're asking me to predict future legal outcomes.
no i'm not
i'm asking you to name which group of people will be the next oppressed grouping of people lobbying for social acceptance and super-legal preference/protection
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
my money is on fat people
Hmmm. Do you mean claiming "discrimination" in terms of physically inaccessible places due to their size?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News