- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2010 or 2013 D. Which was better?
Posted on 2/14/14 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 2/14/14 at 8:35 pm
Those were the 2 best that CSP has had. If you had to chose one to line up for 2014, which would you choose?
4
Posted on 2/14/14 at 8:38 pm to JB2010
2013 easily. Better pass rush
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 8:39 pm
Posted on 2/14/14 at 8:59 pm to TigerBait1127
I agree. I'm seriously in awe of the job RR did this season. The definition of night and day when talking about the Spags year.
Posted on 2/14/14 at 9:00 pm to JB2010
2013 hands down.
eta: 2013 pass rush was better, and more fundamentally sound. 2013 was also more versatile. It had a different defense each week.
eta: 2013 pass rush was better, and more fundamentally sound. 2013 was also more versatile. It had a different defense each week.
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 2/14/14 at 9:16 pm to JB2010
I'm going with 2013 as well.
I think 2009 defense was better than 2010 defense, too. The turnovers were amazing. That's what we need again. I'd love to have a safety with sticky fingers playing center field again.
I think 2009 defense was better than 2010 defense, too. The turnovers were amazing. That's what we need again. I'd love to have a safety with sticky fingers playing center field again.
Posted on 2/14/14 at 9:26 pm to Zoombop
quote:no they weren't, 2009 just free balled and it allowed Sharper to make plays. 2010 was fundamentally sound squad that didn't have the Shaper-esque playmaker
I think 2009 defense was better than 2010 defense, too.
Posted on 2/14/14 at 9:31 pm to fightingtigers98
2011 O with the 2013 D that had Vaccaro and Greer in the secondary.
God forbid a healthy 2 deep defensive line. Foster and several others consistently missed time and would have provided incredible value and depth.
God forbid a healthy 2 deep defensive line. Foster and several others consistently missed time and would have provided incredible value and depth.
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 2/14/14 at 9:35 pm to partywiththelombardi
The 09 D may have gotten the turnovers, but in 2010 we won games when the offense only scored 20, 17, and 14. That's ballin!
Posted on 2/14/14 at 10:05 pm to JB2010
2013 for sure. It's amazing how RR pulled the defense together even with all of the injuries. Hopefully this year we'll have a complete LB corps - hasn't been the case since '09.
Posted on 2/15/14 at 5:25 am to JB2010
it was 2009 and 2013 was a better defense. 09' was heavily favored by our scoring and gambling. 13' was about lining up and goin' after it! this latest defense actually helped the offense a lot.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News