Started By
Message

Where do you rank MLS in the world?

Posted on 2/3/14 at 7:40 pm
Posted by droman225
HTown by way of BR
Member since Aug 2011
13383 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 7:40 pm
LINK

They have it at 49. No fricking way some of those in front of the MLS should be IMO.

I say around 30
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 7:50 pm to
1. Bundesliga
2A. EPL
2B. MLS

But seriously, there's no way we're that far behind Mexico.
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 7:55 pm
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19480 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:01 pm to
I feel pretty confident that most MLS teams got beat the Azerbajaini champs.
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:02 pm to
I don't know. Higher, of course.

IFFHS just uses their fancy name and "mathematics" to troll for attention.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
28422 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

IFFHS just uses their fancy name and "mathematics" to troll for attention.


This. It's really just bullshite. We're below the Cypriot league? Come the frick on. I'm not even going to mention all the other teams that don't deserve to be ahead of us because it would take too long.

Countries that I know have a better league than we do (in no particular order):


Spain
Germany
England
France
Portugal
Italy
Belgium
Russia
The Netherlands
Brazil
Argentina
Mexico
Turkey

Not sure where I would put the Swiss league or the J-League (which is definitely stronger than the K-League and probably pretty close to MLS), and I really can't comment on the average strength of the teams in the Czech league, Colombia, Chile, etc.

I love that Moldova and Costa Rica are ahead of us
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 8:36 pm
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
7797 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:34 pm to
Ranking the MLS highlights the problem of really ranking any of the leagues at all. The only clubs that ever play non-friendly inter league matches are the top ones in the CL so depth is mostly, if not completely, effaced.

Almost all league rankings mean whose 2 or 3 best sides are better and nothing more.

This is obviously where the MLS needs special consideration since the league is so balanced. Most of the smaller European leagues have 1 or 2 "superclubs" that I think are better than the best MLS sides but doubt they would win a complete 1-18 table match-up, for example.




However, it's also a problem even ranking only the European leagues since, for example, Benfica or Porto or Shakhtar Donetsk doing better or not in the CL doesn't really make the other 16 or so sides of the Portuguese/Ukranian leagues any different whatsoever.

This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 8:40 pm
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

I love that Moldova and Costa Rica are ahead of us

This made me LOL so hard.
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 9:01 pm
Posted by GABlueDog
Marietta, GA
Member since Dec 2008
8045 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:08 pm to
I think the MLS is roughly the equivalent of the Championship. The better MLS teams...the SKC, Galaxy, RSL, Dynamo, Red Bulls...are on par with the better Championship teams...the Leicester, QPR, Burnley, Derby County. And the MLS bottom feeders...the DC United, Chivas, etc...are around the level of the Championship trolls...the Barnsley, Millwall, etc.
Posted by thesoccerfanjax
Member since Nov 2013
6128 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:35 pm to
^^^ pretty much that.
Posted by droman225
HTown by way of BR
Member since Aug 2011
13383 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:46 pm to
Dynamo beat stoke
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125388 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 12:28 am to
quote:

I feel pretty confident that most MLS teams got beat the Azerbajaini champs.



yea this has to be a joke

The league is still behind the 2nd division's in like germany, england and spain as well but no way in frick MLS is worse than the Serbian league, Czech and Romanian.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125388 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 12:46 am to
quote:

I think the MLS is roughly the equivalent of the Championship. The better MLS teams...the SKC, Galaxy, RSL, Dynamo, Red Bulls...are on par with the better Championship teams...the Leicester, QPR, Burnley, Derby County. And the MLS bottom feeders...the DC United, Chivas, etc...are around the level of the Championship trolls...the Barnsley, Millwall, etc.



Id say mid level championship to to top level league one. Saying MLS teams are the same as top level championship teams is basically saying MLS is on par with low end EPL teams who always cycle in and out with promotion/relegation.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
28422 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:23 am to
quote:

Dynamo beat stoke


Stoke beat ManU

Ergo, Dynamo should have 20 EPL titles.




Am I doing this right?
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 6:46 am to
quote:

Dynamo beat stoke
SKC beat ManU.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 6:57 am to
quote:

no way in frick MLS is worse than the Serbian league



You really think Robbie Rogers would stand a chance in Belgrade?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125388 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:40 am to
quote:

You really think Robbie Rogers would stand a chance in Belgrade?



i feel so bad for laughing
Posted by Downtown Devin Brown
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2013
1523 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 8:45 am to
quote:

The only clubs that ever play non-friendly inter league matches are the top ones in the CL so depth is mostly, if not completely, effaced.


The lesser teams in the European leagues play each other in the Europa League and the Concacaf CL matches teams from the US, Canada, Mexico, Caribbean, Costa Rica, Honduras, El Sal, Guatemala, Panama, Nicaragua, and Belize.

I'm sure there are more tournaments with non-friendly international competition.
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 8:46 am
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 8:55 am to
There are a few different ways you can go about ranking leagues. Stadiums, TV Contracts, Fan Experience, all of which far exceed the level of play. In that regard, I'd probably say somewhere around 15.

However, in terms of international competitiveness, it's probably more like 25 to 30.
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 9:01 am
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31060 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 11:05 am to
You forgot the all-important MLS all-stars > Champions of Europe.
Posted by svb
Missouri Fan
Member since Jun 2012
3127 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 11:36 am to
I would say 15-20, probably.

Kei Kamara going to the Championship and being one of the best players for Middlesbrough, shows it's a pretty lateral move, in some cases.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram