Started By
Message
locked post

It's their body they can put in what they want...

Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:21 pm
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:21 pm
This argument for drugs, unhealthy foods, etc.

Is it really? If I'm paying for their healthcare in taxes, is it not a concern of mine? Where should the line be drawn?

Obviously we can't say "you can't eat this" because we're not communist bastards. But I don't wanna pay for some fatasses heart medicine 20 years from now.

Go.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:23 pm to
It's a much more substantial argument if the costs of healthcare are not collectivized. The same logic of self-ownership that is used in argument for freedom of ingestion should be applied across the spectrum.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:39 pm to
Think your argument is mostly dumb. Some validity but mostly dumb.

Do you do everything you can to optomise your health? Do you exercise 4-5 times a week. Track caloric intake? Make sure your macro nutrient ratios are in line for your activity level (such as 50% carbs, 25% fats, 25% protein). Do eat organic? Do you make sure your fatty acid intake profiles are sufficient in Omega 3, Omega 6, Omega 9, and DHA, EPA each day? Do you make sure to eat yogurt for probiotics. Do you eat blueberries for their amazing antioxidant profile. Do you drink red wine or otherwise supplement with reservatrol? Do you eat oatmeal for gastrointestinal health? Do you get enough fiber including insoluable fiber? Do you maximize your mental capacity with acytel choline, DMAE, and tyrosine supplements? What about coffee? Do you drink enough for the antioxidant benefits but not too much? How about meats? When you eat red meat do you stick with less marbled cuts? How about your fruits? Do you eat fruits with optimal glycemic indexes to make sure your insulin levels stay stable? Do you realize your liver can only process about 50 grams of fructose per day? Do you know that sucrose is composed of one glucose and one fructose molecule? Do understand the fructose content of different fruits considering the above? How about dairy? Do have you bases covered their for calcium and mineral intake? What about zinc. DO YOU EVEN HAVE ANY frickING CLUE HOW IMPORTANT ZINC IS AND WHAT DAMN FOOD HAVE IT? DOES YOUR IGNORANT arse EVEN UNDERSTAND BIOAVALAIBILITY OF CERTAIN FOODS AND HOW SOME ARE VASTLY SUPPERIOR IN THEIR ORAC CONTENT?????

If you don't have all your fricking ducks in a row, go ahead and die. I am tired of paying for your ignorance with my money I work hard for shite for brains.

(see how this is a slippery slope?)
Posted by Yat27
Austin
Member since Nov 2010
8108 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:41 pm to
I hear this argument all the time, but it never made sense to me. People that live longer often need very expensive, often 24-hour end of life care. Both my maternal grandparents lived to be in their 90s, and both endured cancer and eventual heart problems. I bet my grandmother was hospitalized 7 or 8 times in her last year of life. They both were on Medicare for nearly 30 years... I feel pretty confident that they racked up millions in medical bills.

It never really made sense that fat people, or smokers/drug users that usually die much earlier would incur more healthcare costs.

There are several close family members/friends that I hope lose weight, and I'd like to see several other people close to me quit smoking. My reason was never because it might cost me extra, I'd just like them to be around longer. It's actually quite possible that it costs less to treat the obese and smokers over their lifetimes.

LINK

LINK

LINK
Posted by EllisD
Member since Feb 2009
888 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:42 pm to
Or we could just have people pay for their own healthcare...
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259875 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

This argument for drugs, unhealthy foods, etc.

Is it really? If I'm paying for their healthcare in taxes, is it not a concern of mine? Where should the line be drawn?

Obviously we can't say "you can't eat this" because we're not communist bastards. But I don't wanna pay for some fatasses heart medicine 20 years from now.

Go.



Have fun paying for their incarceration, the incarceration of those who sell the product and the whole CJ system that supports the WoD. It's a helluva lot more expensive than allowing someone to drink, smoke or shoot up.

Not to mention generations of welfare for the families and children of those who are locked up.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 6:43 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Or we could just have people pay for their own healthcare...

Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Or we could just have people pay for their own healthcare...
this is my line of thinking
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Do you do everything you can to optomise your health? Do you exercise 4-5 times a week. Track caloric intake? Make sure your macro nutrient ratios are in line for your activity level (such as 50% carbs, 25% fats, 25% protein). Do eat organic? Do you make sure your fatty acid intake profiles are sufficient in Omega 3, Omega 6, Omega 9, and DHA, EPA each day? Do you make sure to eat yogurt for probiotics. Do you eat blueberries for their amazing antioxidant profile. Do you drink red wine or otherwise supplement with reservatrol? Do you eat oatmeal for gastrointestinal health? Do you get enough fiber including insoluable fiber? Do you maximize your mental capacity with acytel choline, DMAE, and tyrosine supplements? What about coffee? Do you drink enough for the antioxidant benefits but not too much? How about meats? When you eat red meat do you stick with less marbled cuts? How about your fruits? Do you eat fruits with optimal glycemic indexes to make sure your insulin levels stay stable? Do you realize your liver can only process about 50 grams of fructose per day? Do you know that sucrose is composed of one glucose and one fructose molecule? Do understand the fructose content of different fruits considering the above? How about dairy? Do have you bases covered their for calcium and mineral intake? What about zinc. DO YOU EVEN HAVE ANY frickING CLUE HOW IMPORTANT ZINC IS AND WHAT DAMN FOOD HAVE IT? DOES YOUR IGNORANT arse EVEN UNDERSTAND BIOAVALAIBILITY OF CERTAIN FOODS AND HOW SOME ARE VASTLY SUPPERIOR IN THEIR ORAC CONTENT?????


Reading all that just made me hungry.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 6:52 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259875 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

Or we could just have people pay for their own healthcare...



Right on. If it's costing them a lot of money, maybe unhealthy lifestyles wouldn't be so attractive.

But, there will always be bleeding hearts who stick up for ...everyone and expect the public to cover their asses.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:59 pm to


I had fun and started chuckling while typing it. So much damn useless info rattling around in my lil head.

FTR, I just ate almost an entire large papa johns pizza.
Posted by TejasPete
Member since Dec 2013
1425 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:16 pm to
Yes because incarcerating 25% of the worlds prisoners and the multi-trillion dollar war on drugs (that has failed) are a much better alternative than letting people use drugs.

Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

Yes because incarcerating 25% of the worlds prisoners and the multi-trillion dollar war on drugs (that has failed) are a much better alternative than letting people use drugs.


Could not agree more (taking into account the sarcasm).
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
10521 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

Is it really? If I'm paying for their healthcare in taxes, is it not a concern of mine? Where should the line be drawn?


I argue that when republicans I talk to start to go down the "if I end up paying for it" path and they never have a good answer.

Simple solution: we don't pay for it.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56350 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83 Think your argument is mostly dumb. Some validity but mostly dumb. Do you do everything you can to optomise your health? Do you exercise 4-5 times a week. Track caloric intake? Make sure your macro nutrient ratios are in line for your activity level (such as 50% carbs, 25% fats, 25% protein). Do eat organic? Do you make sure your fatty acid intake profiles are sufficient in Omega 3, Omega 6, Omega 9, and DHA, EPA each day? Do you make sure to eat yogurt for probiotics. Do you eat blueberries for their amazing antioxidant profile. Do you drink red wine or otherwise supplement with reservatrol? Do you eat oatmeal for gastrointestinal health? Do you get enough fiber including insoluable fiber? Do you maximize your mental capacity with acytel choline, DMAE, and tyrosine supplements? What about coffee? Do you drink enough for the antioxidant benefits but not too much? How about meats? When you eat red meat do you stick with less marbled cuts? How about your fruits? Do you eat fruits with optimal glycemic indexes to make sure your insulin levels stay stable? Do you realize your liver can only process about 50 grams of fructose per day? Do you know that sucrose is composed of one glucose and one fructose molecule? Do understand the fructose content of different fruits considering the above? How about dairy? Do have you bases covered their for calcium and mineral intake? What about zinc. DO YOU EVEN HAVE ANY frickING CLUE HOW IMPORTANT ZINC IS AND WHAT DAMN FOOD HAVE IT? DOES YOUR IGNORANT arse EVEN UNDERSTAND BIOAVALAIBILITY OF CERTAIN FOODS AND HOW SOME ARE VASTLY SUPPERIOR IN THEIR ORAC CONTENT????? If you don't have all your fricking ducks in a row, go ahead and die. I am tired of paying for your ignorance with my money I work hard for shite for brains. (see how this is a slippery slope?)


...says the guy who supports socialized medicine.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56195 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

If it's costing them a lot of money, maybe unhealthy lifestyles wouldn't be so attractive.


What about cancer for kids? What about those that have genetic testing and carry certain genes, should we just not allow them to breed?

Folks act as if every goddamn disease process is behaviorally modified to an extent that good behaviors are like kryptonite.

I like the collective nature of insurance, I don't mine paying for someones Lipitor(whether genetic or lifestyle), and hopefully I will never need any coverage, but if I get cancer I just hope I can pay for the best treatment.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90473 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:50 pm to
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:50 pm to
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36748 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

This argument for drugs, unhealthy foods, etc.

Is it really? If I'm paying for their healthcare in taxes, is it not a concern of mine? Where should the line be drawn?

Obviously we can't say "you can't eat this" because we're not communist bastards. But I don't wanna pay for some fatasses heart medicine 20 years from now.

Go.


The Legalization of street drugs would increase their purity and help regulate dosage and information about the drugs therefore leading to less accidental overdoses and impure substances on the market. Thus decreasing the cost of healthcare. The violence reduction would also have a positive effect on our healthcare system.

Posted by shattersfull
Member since Dec 2013
64 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

The Legalization of street drugs would increase their purity and help regulate dosage and information about the drugs therefore leading to less accidental overdoses and impure substances on the market. Thus decreasing the cost of healthcare. The violence reduction would also have a positive effect on our healthcare system.



The same people who can't remember to take their birth control pills are the ones you are trying to claim will have the knowledge to not overdose....oh keep up the humor.

The sames ones who drop out of school and don't want to work are the ones who are now going to act responsible...

OK

You can make a better argument for legalizing but this one ain't it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram