- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Question for Libertarians Regarding Interdiction
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:42 am
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:42 am
How does the idea and the reasoning for an interdiction mesh with libertarian thought?
Would interdictions exist in a libertarian society?
Would interdictions exist in a libertarian society?
8
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:43 am to TheLankiestLawyer
boose these people don't know what an interdiction is. you'll have to explain
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:45 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
boose
The OP is boosiebadazz? I missed that guy.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:48 am to TheLankiestLawyer
Someone is going to use the word "contract" to explain this. And it will be amusing.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:49 am to Sentrius
slim thug/boosiebadazz/TheLankiestLawyer 
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:50 am to Sentrius
I don't know what that was about
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:53 am to SlowFlowPro
Please let it be true. Welcome back boosie. 
I'll let this thread get back on track and watch with interest.
I'll let this thread get back on track and watch with interest.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:53 am to TheLankiestLawyer
What does ideology have to do with making decisions for someone not capable of making decisions for themselves?
How is it any different than making decisions for your minor children?
How is it any different than making decisions for your minor children?
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:55 am to dante
I can't even imagine not understanding how those are related.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:56 am to dante
Who would have the authority to compel an interdiction?
Would there be different standards in the different private courts/ systems of arbitration?
And on a philosophical level, how/why would we, in a libertarian society, let one person compel the taking away of another's rights to manage his affairs?
Isn't that the antithesis to personal freedom?
Would there be different standards in the different private courts/ systems of arbitration?
And on a philosophical level, how/why would we, in a libertarian society, let one person compel the taking away of another's rights to manage his affairs?
Isn't that the antithesis to personal freedom?
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 11:58 am
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:06 pm to TheLankiestLawyer
I hope some of the posters more well-read in Libertarian thought than me chime in. I think it could make for an interesting discussion.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:09 pm to TheLankiestLawyer
do you want a discussion with libertarians or anarchists, b/c it sounds like you want the anarchist perspective
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:12 pm to TheLankiestLawyer
Interesting thought.
I have no idea, but I would think the onus would be on those who want to have dealings with the handicapped individual. Its their risk to take.
Of course, then everybody who does have dealings with the individual would be on a charity basis.
Just my guess.
I have no idea, but I would think the onus would be on those who want to have dealings with the handicapped individual. Its their risk to take.
Of course, then everybody who does have dealings with the individual would be on a charity basis.
Just my guess.
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:13 pm to TheLankiestLawyer
quote:Isn't it usually a family member who initiates the process?
Who would have the authority to compel an interdiction?
quote:I have no clue.
Would there be different standards in the different private courts/ systems of arbitration?
quote:If a person is not mentally capable of managing his affairs how are you actually taking anything away from him?
how/why would we, in a libertarian society, let one person compel the taking away of another's rights to manage his affairs?
quote:Should I let my 13 year old make all decision concerning his personal freedoms?
Isn't that the antithesis to personal freedom?
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Either one
I don't know much about the particulars of how Libertarian thought would treat interdictions, but it seems like the idea of an interdiction would go against Libertarian (and certainly anarchist) thought.
I don't know much about the particulars of how Libertarian thought would treat interdictions, but it seems like the idea of an interdiction would go against Libertarian (and certainly anarchist) thought.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:16 pm to TheLankiestLawyer
Hey Boozie. I am glad you are not VB. 
Did your health care cost go up? Are you married with a baby yet?
Did your health care cost go up? Are you married with a baby yet?
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:21 pm to cajunangelle
No babies and no marriage(s).
And my healthcare costs have not gone up
And my healthcare costs have not gone up
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:39 pm to TheLankiestLawyer
The last time I debated interdiction it had nothing to do with this definition. It involved US efforts to go into drug supplying nations and stop production and shipment before the drugs entered the U.S.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:42 pm to TheLankiestLawyer
well there is a big difference in no law and some law/limited government
a system of no law doesn't have criminal law, either. criminal law deprives liberty of people, too
any legal/court system deprives people of certain rights. if you do harm to me and i sue you in a court of law, then if i win i'm depriving you of your property. this deprivation is fully legal as long as certain due process (in a system of law)
this is a question for those who support systems of no law, imho
a system of no law doesn't have criminal law, either. criminal law deprives liberty of people, too
any legal/court system deprives people of certain rights. if you do harm to me and i sue you in a court of law, then if i win i'm depriving you of your property. this deprivation is fully legal as long as certain due process (in a system of law)
this is a question for those who support systems of no law, imho
Page 1 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News