- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:32 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 4:57 am
7
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:33 pm to DelU249
if we tossed in thomas morestead in on the trade, yes, the answer is yes.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:37 pm to DelU249
But who would have thrown to him?
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:37 pm to DelU249
Yes, because we'd be the #2 seed with a bye.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:37 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:
But who would have thrown to him?
hopefully not colston.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:37 pm to DelU249
No we went to sh!t as soon as Brees signed that deal remember?
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:38 pm to DelU249
How well does Josh Gordon run a RB screen route?
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:40 pm to MrPappagiorgio
I can't remember the last good screen we ran.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:43 pm to goatmilker
josh Gordon's contract is peanuts
and if you don't think paying your quarterback $2o million per is a bad idea then I cannot help you.
for that money, a qb needs to carry the team...manning does it, brees doesn't. He's still great, just not worth that kind of annual dough in terms of performance.
I hope we keep hitting on our draft picks because we won't be resigning a lot of guys and if we fail to keep finding draft gold then we're fricked as far as being serious super bowl contenders.
and if you don't think paying your quarterback $2o million per is a bad idea then I cannot help you.
for that money, a qb needs to carry the team...manning does it, brees doesn't. He's still great, just not worth that kind of annual dough in terms of performance.
I hope we keep hitting on our draft picks because we won't be resigning a lot of guys and if we fail to keep finding draft gold then we're fricked as far as being serious super bowl contenders.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:44 pm to DelU249
I thought you would agree 
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:45 pm to goatmilker
josh has 2 more years left on his deal, yikes.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:46 pm to DelU249
quote:
and if you don't think paying your quarterback $2o million per is a bad idea then I cannot help you.
for that money, a qb needs to carry the team...manning does it, brees doesn't. He's still great, just not worth that kind of annual dough in terms of performance.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:49 pm to burdman
Cleveland was trying to trade him for a second round pick and nobody wanted that deal. I think everyone would take that now
Posted on 1/13/14 at 12:50 pm to heytigerfans
don't tell me that. That makes me want to puke. The stage 3 is a monster concern, but totally worth the risk. The best receiver in football for a second round pick... 
Posted on 1/13/14 at 1:00 pm to DelU249
No.
The Saints still would have been undefeated at home.
They still would have refused to stick with the running game.
Because the running game was no threat, teams still would have played deep and forced the Saints to work the flats and underneath routes.
Brees still would have gotten pummeled in St. Louis, Carolina and Seattle(unless Gordon was a great interior blocker)
The weather conditions still would have been shitty in Seattle thereby forcing the Saints to abandon any down-field passing game.
The Saints still would have been undefeated at home.
They still would have refused to stick with the running game.
Because the running game was no threat, teams still would have played deep and forced the Saints to work the flats and underneath routes.
Brees still would have gotten pummeled in St. Louis, Carolina and Seattle(unless Gordon was a great interior blocker)
The weather conditions still would have been shitty in Seattle thereby forcing the Saints to abandon any down-field passing game.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 1:14 pm to DelU249
Let's ask Tampa, Arizona,Minnesota,Cleveland,Jacksonville,Oakland,Jets,
Houston, Tennesse, Buffalo or Miami how much they would shell out for a quarterback.
Look how well the Pelicans are doing without Chris Paul.
Houston, Tennesse, Buffalo or Miami how much they would shell out for a quarterback.
Look how well the Pelicans are doing without Chris Paul.
This post was edited on 1/13/14 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 1/13/14 at 1:20 pm to DelU249
quote:
and if you don't think paying your quarterback $2o million per is a bad idea then I cannot help you.
No I didn't. It sucks for sure with the cap we have but I would have done it then and today.
You would have let him walk and thats fine.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 2:36 pm to DelU249
quote:
are we in the NFC title game?
No. WRs weren't the issue. QB and HC were.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 2:37 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
WRs weren't the issue. QB and HC were.
keep lance and toon.
cut payton and drew.
WINNING
Posted on 1/13/14 at 2:54 pm to goatmilker
so many ways loomis fricked this up
1. he waited...which not only upped the price but left us unable to retain nicks
2. he gave tons of shite contracts beforehand. Yeah, he didn't know manning was going to sign a monster deal, but it's his job to plan for shite like that
3. reason with him, pay him the same, but tell him you cannot go down for 20 in the first 2 seasons because I'm a retard with a history of giving mediocre to below average players monster deals
that's what it cost to keep him and yes you do it, but everything else was fricked. This is before we get to the part where I tell you only one qb gets that money because he will drag your team to 13 wins every year...and that qb isn't drew brees.
1. he waited...which not only upped the price but left us unable to retain nicks
2. he gave tons of shite contracts beforehand. Yeah, he didn't know manning was going to sign a monster deal, but it's his job to plan for shite like that
3. reason with him, pay him the same, but tell him you cannot go down for 20 in the first 2 seasons because I'm a retard with a history of giving mediocre to below average players monster deals
that's what it cost to keep him and yes you do it, but everything else was fricked. This is before we get to the part where I tell you only one qb gets that money because he will drag your team to 13 wins every year...and that qb isn't drew brees.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News