Started By
Message
locked post

David Brooks thinks you're incapable of smoking weed and not ruining your life..

Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:30 am
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:30 am
Even though he was able to...we need Nanny to protect you:

quote:

So, like the vast majority of people who try drugs, we aged out. We left marijuana behind. I don’t have any problem with somebody who gets high from time to time, but I guess, on the whole, I think being stoned is not a particularly uplifting form of pleasure and should be discouraged more than encouraged.

We now have a couple states — Colorado and Washington — that have gone into the business of effectively encouraging drug use. By making weed legal, they are creating a situation in which the price will drop substantially. One RAND study suggests that prices could plummet by up to 90 percent, before taxes and such. As prices drop and legal fears go away, usage is bound to increase. This is simple economics, and it is confirmed by much research. Colorado and Washington, in other words, are producing more users.


LINK

My favorite line highlighted...removal of prohibition now equates to state sponsored encouragement....David Brooks is to the NYT as Allen Colmes is to Fox.
This post was edited on 1/3/14 at 9:38 am
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:43 am to
It's almost as if he doesn't want the free market to do its job.. thanks for the Econ lesson though David!


Carlin has a great bit about baby boomers and how they became self-righteous and in their hypocrisy they tell kids to not make the "same mistakes" as they did. It's relevant here I think. Great bit too. frick these yuppies!
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34857 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:07 am to
I am sympathetic to Brook's analysis in one respect, C; and that is that a lot of the populous WON'T be able to exert the discipline in their psyches to tow the work ethic line. They'll end up being a drag on the overall economy. I say this, because I have EXTENSIVE experience in the pot-consumption dynamic, as such affected my own perception, motivation/willpower and values. Pot will change perspective; for the good or bad...depending on the individual.

Freedom is wonderful...but only wed to wisdom and a strong will.

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:13 am to
Some people become alcoholics,too...should the state go back to prohibiting it?
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34857 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:14 am to
quote:

boomers and how they became self-righteous and in their hypocrisy they tell kids to not make the "same mistakes


I've shot stuff in my veins that I wouldn't want to get on my hands today, RR. Do you really believe that it's "hypocrisy and self-righteous" of me to warn against such to my Grandchildren?

Carlin...innate talent of humor which rocks boats and makes us laugh...but a hopeless (Godless) cynic at heart. No way I'd trade places and live in his mind. I'd consider that an asskickin'! And good reason to get back on the straight and narrow to Love.

Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
75339 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Some people become alcoholics,too...should the state go back to prohibiting it?



Sadly, I actually heard people wanting more regulation for alcohol
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

By making weed legal, they are creating a situation in which the price will drop substantially.


On the news they said it tripled in price on the first day.

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Sadly, I actually heard people wanting more regulation for alcohol


We will always have people who fear freedom.
Posted by PuntBamaPunt
Member since Nov 2010
10070 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:21 am to
what a dipshit.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9044 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:22 am to
quote:

I am sympathetic to Brook's analysis in one respect, C; and that is that a lot of the populous WON'T be able to exert the discipline in their psyches to tow the work ethic line. They'll end up being a drag on the overall economy. I say this, because I have EXTENSIVE experience in the pot-consumption dynamic, as such affected my own perception, motivation/willpower and values. Pot will change perspective; for the good or bad...depending on the individual. Freedom is wonderful...but only wed to wisdom and a strong will.


Agreed.

In regards to the "people become alcoholics" argument, I can only say that we don't need more legalized substances than we already have. It's a weak retort I know, and doesn't hold up well in a debate, but's its all I've got.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:24 am to
quote:

In regards to the "people become alcoholics" argument, I can only say that we don't need more legalized substances than we already have. It's a weak retort I know, and doesn't hold up well in a debate, but's its all I've got.


So should people be free to succeed or fail on their own terms or would you prefer someone to limit your freedom and tell you what's best for you?

Also, all drugs were decriminalized in Portugal about 5 years ago and drug abuse rates declined...weird, hunh?
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7178 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:26 am to
Brooks is not a free market libertarian and I don't even think he is necessarily arguing for illegality of pot. Instead, he is engaging in some hand wringing over the impact of legalizationon on our populace. Thoughtful, if tentative. Standard Brooks stuff, but worthwhile reading in my opinion.
Posted by MJM
Member since Aug 2007
2485 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:28 am to
Scarborough was going off on a rant this morning about how dumb pot makes you but then admits he has never smoked it.

People just fear things that they have no experience with
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67635 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:30 am to
What is Eric Holder doing about it?

After all, on a federal level this is against the "LAW of THE LAND".

Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22774 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

By making weed legal, they are creating a situation in which the price will drop substantially. One RAND study suggests that prices could plummet by up to 90 percent, before taxes and such.


Not buying, but hope he's right
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:35 am to
Stoner David Brooks

Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14477 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:36 am to
Wow. Way to reduce his argument to a straw man.

No where in his article does he say CO should go back and make pot illegal. He simply warns that there will be consequences (my favorite lines highlighted):

quote:

The people who debate these policy changes usually cite the health risks users would face or the tax revenues the state might realize. Many people these days shy away from talk about the moral status of drug use because that would imply that one sort of life you might choose is better than another sort of life.

But, of course, these are the core questions: Laws profoundly mold culture, so what sort of community do we want our laws to nurture? What sort of individuals and behaviors do our governments want to encourage? I’d say that in healthy societies government wants to subtly tip the scale to favor temperate, prudent, self-governing citizenship. In those societies, government subtly encourages the highest pleasures, like enjoying the arts or being in nature, and discourages lesser pleasures, like being stoned.

In legalizing weed, citizens of Colorado are, indeed, enhancing individual freedom. But they are also nurturing a moral ecology in which it is a bit harder to be the sort of person most of us want to be.


Not everything that should be legal is good. If you cannot understand the difference between reading "pot isn't good for you" and "pot should be illegal" then I suggest you miss the whole point of the debate.

This is exactly the model of discussion we should have. Legalize something, then discuss the repercussions of that choice. Individuals can then follow up by making their own decision.

Pouncing on people that want to warn others that pot use may not be the best life style choice (duh) as promoting a nanny state seems at best an over-reaction and at worst counterproductive to the cause of letting adults make fully informed adult decisions.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

I've shot stuff in my veins that I wouldn't want to get on my hands today, RR. Do you really believe that it's "hypocrisy and self-righteous" of me to warn against such to my Grandchildren?


In some cases yes I'm sure the intentions are true. In other cases it's patriarchal meddling that discloses a sense of an older generation knowing what's best for everyone else.

quote:

Carlin...innate talent of humor which rocks boats and makes us laugh...but a hopeless (Godless) cynic at heart.


He's one of the brightest thinkers in the history of comedy. Sorry, he's "godless." But I think there's a reason there are no Christian conservative comedians.

quote:

No way I'd trade places and live in his mind. I'd consider that an asskickin'! And good reason to get back on the straight and narrow to Love.


If only the world were so lacking in things to be cynical about..
Posted by Buddy Garrity
Member since Mar 2013
4224 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Pot will change perspective; for the good or bad.
I honestly think weed changed me for the better.
Posted by CherryGarciaMan
Sugar Magnolia
Member since Aug 2012
2497 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:

On the news they said it tripled in price on the first day.




News is WAAAAYYYY wrong.

Oz is CO is around $125, which is around $2000 a lb. You can't beat that anywhere except Uruguay.


Plus, it makes no sense. Why would opening up a market that was illegal increase the price threefold.

Dumb news is dumb.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram