Started By
Message
locked post

NBA Considering Changing Draft Format

Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:03 am
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78186 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:03 am
LINK

Interesting idea, imo.

Posted by Fleur De Lethal
NOLA
Member since Aug 2009
957 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:06 am to
That sounds ridiculous.

Here's a novel idea:

Draft order is determined by record (worst to first) like every other freaking league known to man.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150535 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:07 am to
Interesting. Not sure teams would go for that though, since it takes the whole lottery thing out of play (which I feel like they drum up interest with that, and also makes for awesome conspiracy theories).

Something like this would help with trades though, since you would automatically know what picks you're trading for (as opposed to conditional ones).
Posted by tom
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
8152 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:08 am to
I wish they would just cut the season in half. Problem solved and no complicated draft format needed.
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78186 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Interesting. Not sure teams would go for that though, since it takes the whole lottery thing out of play (which I feel like they drum up interest with that, and also makes for awesome conspiracy theories).

Something like this would help with trades though, since you would automatically know what picks you're trading for (as opposed to conditional ones).


Obviously the main objective with this format would be to eliminate tanking. I'm not as opposed to drastic change as most are, especially in basketball.

Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78186 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:10 am to
quote:

That sounds ridiculous.

Here's a novel idea:

Draft order is determined by record (worst to first) like every other freaking league known to man.



You sound adventurous.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110582 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:10 am to
Stan Van Gundy's been talking about this for quite a while.

I'm not opposed to it, I like it.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20740 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:11 am to
Certainly gives the underclassman #1 pick some sort of option of who he would play for
Posted by bradwieser
Cornell Fan
Member since May 2008
10555 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:11 am to
quote:

That sounds ridiculous.
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:12 am to
I like it.

Anything to eliminate the tanking mentality.

quote:

Certainly gives the underclassman #1 pick some sort of option of who he would play for


That's a great point. Imagine if the Raptors have the #1 pick your freshman year, but the Lakers have it the next year. What to do?
This post was edited on 12/23/13 at 10:13 am
Posted by Fleur De Lethal
NOLA
Member since Aug 2009
957 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:14 am to
quote:

quote:
That sounds ridiculous.

Here's a novel idea:

Draft order is determined by record (worst to first) like every other freaking league known to man.



You sound adventurous.



Haha. Yeah I know. I just hate the whole lottery thing. I mean when you really suck as a team, it really sucks worse when you get hosed and end up with a lower pick then you should have.

I get that it's in place to prevent tanking, but every other league uses team records to set draft order and there really aren't many tanking concerns.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150535 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Obviously the main objective with this format would be to eliminate tanking

Of course. And I'd be all about it if it would stop tanking, because that's bullshite for a team to do (I understand it strategically, but it completely fricks the paying fans).
quote:

I'm not as opposed to drastic change as most are, especially in basketball.

The owners won't go for it IMO.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86434 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:15 am to
This may be a dumb question but I don't follow the NBA. Why don't they have a system like the NFL where it's merit based?
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78186 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:16 am to
quote:

The owners won't go for it IMO.


I dont think they will either.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421245 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:17 am to
quote:

The owners won't go for it IMO.

i agree with this

i think this concept with "pods" could be more feasible. split the league into 6 pods of 5 teams

split the draft into 6 pods. you know until infinity what pod-slot you will be in.

within each pod, the worst record gets the best pick and the best record gets the worst pick
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150535 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Certainly gives the underclassman #1 pick some sort of option of who he would play for


That's true too...would definitely affect decisions to come out of/stay in college for high-profile players.

"Oh, I'm the best player and Milwaukee is the #1 pick this year, but the Lakers are the #1 pick next year? Cool..I'll stick it out another year."
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110582 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:19 am to
quote:

This may be a dumb question but I don't follow the NBA. Why don't they have a system like the NFL where it's merit based?
Isn't it the opposite of merit based?
Posted by Fleur De Lethal
NOLA
Member since Aug 2009
957 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:20 am to
quote:

That's true too...would definitely affect decisions to come out of/stay in college for high-profile players.

"Oh, I'm the best player and Milwaukee is the #1 pick this year, but the Lakers are the #1 pick next year? Cool..I'll stick it out another year."


I think it would just increase the gap between the haves and the have nots in the NBA. Like you said, players will wait a year to go to the team they want.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86434 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Isn't it the opposite of merit based?


Perhaps, but the bottom line is still that your draft number is based on on-field performance. That's still merit based right?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110582 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Perhaps, but the bottom line is still that your draft number is based on on-field performance. That's still merit based right?
It's the complete opposite, but I get what you're saying.

Merit based would be the Super Bowl champs getting the #1 pick, based on merit.

It's the anti-merit, has a nice ring to it!!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram