- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why is Michigan State & the Big10 not lobbying for tBCSNCG?
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:14 pm
Why accept a crappy, non-relevant Rose Bowl bid? Why would they not want to play f$u for all the marbles?
14
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:15 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
Why accept a crappy, non-relevant Rose Bowl bid?
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:16 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
They are too low in the polls maybe.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:16 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
They're realistic? 
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:16 pm to Walking the Earth
b/c they lost to Notre Dame
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:16 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
take a look at their schedule.
they beat one good team. thats it
they beat one good team. thats it
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:17 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
lost to ND not LSU
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:18 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
Their corch just said he doesn't care. Why do these dumbasses act like they're above lobbying? Idiot Mike Gundy cost them and LSU in 2007.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:19 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
Not feasible IMO. Comparing losses is stupid, but beating Bama and Mizzou is far more impressive than beating tOSU. AU has better wins on their resume and deserves to go over MSU.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:30 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
Why accept a crappy, non-relevant Rose Bowl bid? Why would they not want to play f$u for all the marbles?
I know i'm posting in a troll thread but who cares.
Because they know that their strength of schedule was even worse than Ohio State's.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:40 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
I wondered the same thing - because they came in ranked #10 I guess.
quote:come on man
crappy, non-relevant Rose Bowl bid?
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:43 pm to benhamin5555
quote:
Not feasible IMO. Comparing losses is stupid, but beating Bama and Mizzou is far more impressive than beating tOSU. AU has better wins on their resume and deserves to go over MSU.
The very same could .. and was said .. in 2011 .. for Oklahoma State .. yet Alabama got the nod, without even winning its Division of the SEC. Funny how people only think these sorts of things when it benefits them or their school.
Playoff .. not with only 4 .. but a minimum 8 .. solves this!!
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:44 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
Why accept a crappy, non-relevant Rose Bowl bid?
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:44 pm to Tigers58
If Vegas liked OSU over Auburn, and MSU beat OSU, would Vegas like MSU over Auburn too?
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:47 pm to benhamin5555
quote:
Not feasible IMO. Comparing losses is stupid, but beating Bama and Mizzou is far more impressive than beating tOSU. AU has better wins on their resume and deserves to go over MSU.
hello 2007
but LSU > Notre Dame anyways so Auburn has betters wins and a better loss.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:47 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
Why is a Florida fan worried about bowl games when his team is on the sideline at home? 
Posted on 12/7/13 at 11:50 pm to The Boat
quote:
hello 2007
LSU got in over the other teams in 07 because the WON the toughest conference in the nation. Nothing to do with "good losses". In fact, LSU had very bad losses in 07, both to unranked teams.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 12:01 am to UFownstSECsince1950
#GASouthern
Posted on 12/8/13 at 12:02 am to benhamin5555
I typed 2007 instead of 2011 for some reason.
I zapped 2011 out of my mind.
Alabama got in because of a better loss. OK State had better wins.
eta: But going off of the typo LSU also got in because they were "undefeated in regulation" i.e.. better losses.
I zapped 2011 out of my mind.
Alabama got in because of a better loss. OK State had better wins.
eta: But going off of the typo LSU also got in because they were "undefeated in regulation" i.e.. better losses.
This post was edited on 12/8/13 at 12:07 am
Posted on 12/8/13 at 12:21 am to The Boat
MSU had a close loss to ND on the road and had 3-4 questionable PI calls go against them before going on to dominate their conference winning every game by 10+.
Auburn was dominated at home by a bi-polar LSU team and had 5 close wins, two of which qualify as miracle wins.
Id say MSU belongs in the conversation as this was definitely not a good year for the SEC.
Auburn was dominated at home by a bi-polar LSU team and had 5 close wins, two of which qualify as miracle wins.
Id say MSU belongs in the conversation as this was definitely not a good year for the SEC.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News