Started By
Message
locked post

Judgment at Nuremberg is on TCM @ 9:45 pm (Eastern)

Posted on 11/20/13 at 5:59 pm
Posted by IonaTiger
The Commonwealth Of Virginia
Member since Mar 2006
33048 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 5:59 pm
For those of you who haven't seen it, it's a pretty powerful film.

Spencer Tracy plays a great role as an American judge as does Maximillian Schell, as the defense attorney. Judy Garland and Montgomery Clift's characters are pretty depressing.
Posted by Unknown_Poster
Member since Jun 2013
5758 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 6:18 pm to
Great movie. Even has Col. Klink in it!
Posted by wartiger2004
Proud LGB Supporter!
Member since Aug 2011
17812 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 6:37 pm to
I've never seen it from start to finish. thanks dvr'ing it
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98056 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 6:58 pm to
Paul Hebert, for whom the LSU Law School is named, was one of the Nuremberg judges.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98056 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Great movie. Even has Col. Klink in it!


Was a German Jew. Agreed to do Hogan's Heroes with the stipulation that the Nazis be shown as buffoons.

BTW, if you see him in other roles, he had a flawless American accent.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51206 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 7:07 pm to
Great movie. Very powerful. Burt Lancaster is excellent in it.

It has a young William Shatner in it as well.
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 8:35 pm to
Damn it is so long though.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8173 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 8:40 pm to
DID YOU SIT ON HIS LAP? ?WAS IT MORE THAN A KISS??
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64058 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 8:40 pm to
Thanks. Recording now.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66866 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 10:09 pm to
Marlene Dietrich's facelift looked pretty good for that time.
Posted by Unknown_Poster
Member since Jun 2013
5758 posts
Posted on 11/20/13 at 10:34 pm to
Major Hochstetter plays Judy Garland's father!
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9448 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 2:48 pm to
I'd never seen this movie before. Thanks for the heads up.

I would be willing to bet that an embarrassingly high percentage of Americans know very little about the Nuremberg Tribunals and even less about the Nuremberg Laws. The German forced sterilization program of the "genetically inferior" was partially inspired by US eugenic policies, with California leading the way. CA didn't stop forced sterilizations until the mid-60s, yet in the late 40s the Allies were convicting Germans for the same thing. North Carolina didn't end their state eugenics program until 1977. Obviously, eugenics were just a small part of the Nuremberg Trials, but I think it was hypocritical nevertheless.

Personally, I think a large part of the Nuremberg Trials were just a series of dog and pony shows, with guilty verdicts as a forgone conclusion. I'm far from being a Nazi sympathizer, but it seems to me that it was largely a Kangaroo Court. If we had lost the war, would Curtis LeMay have faced war crime charges for firebombing every major city in Japan? You're an attorney, what's your opinion?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89450 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Very powerful. Burt Lancaster is excellent in it.


He was good, but I think he took it a little too seriously and seems a little stiff at times.

However, the acting in this was just first rate, across the board - I was particularly impressed with Tracy (the other judges, too), but Widmark and Schell as attorneys, and Garland and Clift as witnesses all produced their best acting performances, IMHO, all in the same film. One of my favorites.

I think it is Stanley Kramer's best film and that's saying something.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98056 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

I'd never seen this movie before. Thanks for the heads up.

I would be willing to bet that an embarrassingly high percentage of Americans know very little about the Nuremberg Tribunals and even less about the Nuremberg Laws. The German forced sterilization program of the "genetically inferior" was partially inspired by US eugenic policies, with California leading the way. CA didn't stop forced sterilizations until the mid-60s, yet in the late 40s the Allies were convicting Germans for the same thing. North Carolina didn't end their state eugenics program until 1977. Obviously, eugenics were just a small part of the Nuremberg Trials, but I think it was hypocritical nevertheless.

Personally, I think a large part of the Nuremberg Trials were just a series of dog and pony shows, with guilty verdicts as a forgone conclusion. I'm far from being a Nazi sympathizer, but it seems to me that it was largely a Kangaroo Court. If we had lost the war, would Curtis LeMay have faced war crime charges for firebombing every major city in Japan? You're an attorney, what's your opinion?


Robert Taft opposed the Nuremberg trials, for some of the reasons you state, at considerable political risk to himself.

OTOH, the alternative plan was summary execution of the major Nazis, and probably lots of others. That was what the Russians were pushing for.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89450 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

summary execution of the major Nazis


quote:

That was what the Russians were pushing for.


That's what they did, A LOT, in the Eastern sectors and Poland.
This post was edited on 11/21/13 at 3:24 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98056 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I think it is Stanley Kramer's best film and that's saying something.


as great as Judgement at Nuremberg is, my vote goes to On The Beach.
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9448 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 5:00 pm to
Stalin's Russia could give Hitler's Germany a run for it's money when it came to executing enemies of the state. And as hard as is to imagine, Stalin probably cared even less about the Russian population in general than Hitler did about non-Ayran Germans. Stalin was a ruthless bastard.
Posted by IonaTiger
The Commonwealth Of Virginia
Member since Mar 2006
33048 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 5:49 pm to
White Roach, I am happy that you watched the movie and that it led you to think about some valid issues.

I think that the Nuremberg trials were necessary. The world needed to know what happened under Nazi leadership. The interesting issue to me is why should ordinary soldiers and officers be punished for obeying the orders of their superiors? A major part of the defense of these men was, “I was just following orders.” The concentration camps were certainly crimes against humanity. The Nazis decided that they were the “master race” and “lesser races” were to be obliterated from the face of the earth. The architects of this thinking deserved the death penalty as far as I am concerned.

There was (and still is) true evil in the world. Watching movies like "Judgment At Nuremberg", "Schlinder's List", "Sophie's Choice", etc. are heartbreaking to me. I cannot understand how people can do such things to other people.

I do not think the trials were a kangaroo court, although I do think that the outcome was predictable. When the facts were laid out, what rational thinking person could not say that the actions were crimes against humanity?

The issue of sterilization was interesting. I thought that one of the most powerful moments in the film is when the German defense lawyer (and I cannot remember the quote verbatim) asked the witness if he knew who authored the “Three generations of imbeciles is enough.” quote. The defense lawyer revealed that it was a quote written my Oliver Wendell Holmes in a majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court.

Had we lost the war, I am sure that many of our General Officers and political leaders would have been executed. I think the difference is that the Japanese and Germans would have carried out the executions in a summary manner. I am not sure, but I think we may have dropped pamphlets on Dresden before the pattern bombing and warned the Japanese that we were going to unleash the deadliest of bombs on Japan and requested their surrender before we dropped it. I am not saying that we were perfect. I am sure that Americans committed atrocities during WWII. But it is the winners that conduct the trials. This is not to say that such thinking is correct, only that it is the way it generally happens.

I am not aware of any trials of American soldiers during WWII. I do recall the trial of Lt. Calley for the My Lai Massacre during the Viet Nam War. I was a junior in HS and emotions were running high because of the unpopularity of that war.

One of the most interesting people I met in my life was a court reporter in the late 1970s. He took down deposition testimony by using a steno pad and a fountain pen (not the type that has a cartridge, but the type that sucks the ink up through the nib). He told me that he was a court reporter at the Nuremberg Trials. A very interesting man. R.I.P, Jack.

Posted by Unknown_Poster
Member since Jun 2013
5758 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 6:00 pm to
Most of the legal weight behind the Nuremberg prosecutions was ad hoc so it pretty much was a dog and pony show. That said, they got due process. The Nazis documented so much their guilt was beyond question and the proceedings laid the groundwork for a lot International law (in that area) that exists today.

And yeah, the infamous 'three generations of imbeciles is enough' was from Holmes in Buck v. Bell. The case is worth reading for a laugh as a lot of Holmes' language reads like it's straight out of Mein Kampf.
This post was edited on 11/21/13 at 6:04 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98056 posts
Posted on 11/21/13 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

And yeah, the infamous 'three generations of imbeciles is enough' was from Holmes in Buck v. Bell. The case is worth reading for a laugh as a lot of Holmes' language reads like it's straight out of Mein Kampf.


Hitler got his idea of lebensraum and ethnic cleansing from two historical sources: The Turkish genocide of the Armenians and the American idea of Manifest Destiny and its resulting treatment of the American Indian.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram