Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Is Southern California relevent again?

Posted on 11/16/13 at 10:30 pm
Posted by Buttermilk Pancakes
Philadelphia
Member since Jul 2013
2013 posts
Posted on 11/16/13 at 10:30 pm
Brent thinks so....
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27870 posts
Posted on 11/16/13 at 10:32 pm to
That probably depends on your definition of relevant.
Posted by SA4LSU
AZ
Member since Sep 2005
4032 posts
Posted on 11/16/13 at 10:32 pm to
No. Not yet.
Posted by LSUlefty
Youngsville, LA
Member since Dec 2007
26432 posts
Posted on 11/16/13 at 10:32 pm to
Musberger said so it must be true.
Posted by CalCajun
in a goodtimin state of mind
Member since Nov 2007
1163 posts
Posted on 11/16/13 at 11:48 pm to
Im sure they (SC FANBASE) think they are now...
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 11/16/13 at 11:55 pm to
According to the MSB, only Bama is relevant.

So no.
Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 11/16/13 at 11:58 pm to
Haha, I cringed when I heard that. No. Relevant to the conference maybe but not nationally. At least not until the '14 preseason mags come out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram