- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should personal foul penalties be reviewable, IYO?
Posted on 11/10/13 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 11/10/13 at 3:13 pm
Watching the Bengals-Ravens there were back to PF penalties.
1. Burfict pushed Jacoby Jones after the play was called dead, one of the Ravens players took issue and pushed Burfict. Only the Ravens were called for the PF.
2. Flacco heading out of bounds, Burfict going for the tackle while Flacco is still in bounds, hits him while he's on the verge of going out, but still in bounds when he first hits him.
Should intent matter? Should there be different levels of PFs?
1. Burfict pushed Jacoby Jones after the play was called dead, one of the Ravens players took issue and pushed Burfict. Only the Ravens were called for the PF.
2. Flacco heading out of bounds, Burfict going for the tackle while Flacco is still in bounds, hits him while he's on the verge of going out, but still in bounds when he first hits him.
Should intent matter? Should there be different levels of PFs?
8
Posted on 11/10/13 at 3:15 pm to ZZTIGERS
If personal fouls should be reviewable, so should all penalties. So frick no.
Posted on 11/10/13 at 3:16 pm to ZZTIGERS
I used to think no. But now that they call it over the dumbest shite, yes they should be
Posted on 11/10/13 at 3:49 pm to ZZTIGERS
Yes. Its 15 yards and an automatic first down penalty. It can change an entire game, and the blind refs throw the personal foul flag too quickly. They should be reviewed.
Posted on 11/10/13 at 4:05 pm to ZZTIGERS
I think late hits can somewhat be objectively judged but others like roughing the quarterback can't be at all. A review wouldn't really work.
Posted on 11/10/13 at 4:20 pm to ZZTIGERS
I know one thing that should definitely be reviewable
False start/encroachment
False start/encroachment
Posted on 11/10/13 at 4:22 pm to ZZTIGERS
No they should not be
Posted on 11/10/13 at 4:36 pm to ZZTIGERS
Personally, if you're going to have replay, everything should be reviewable. Keep the number of challenges the same, two per team with a possible third. It wouldn't change most games, but there could be crucial penalties that are avoided.
Posted on 11/10/13 at 4:49 pm to ZZTIGERS
May as well make every single play/penalty reviewable. Teams still get only 2 challenges, it wouldn't hurt.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News