Started By
Message
locked post

Saban spends 50% more annually on his program than Miles does

Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:18 am
Posted by Jesus Prejean
Member since Jan 2012
258 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:18 am
That's a whopping $12 million margin.

LINK /

Also, Saban spends $3 million on 20+ recruiting staff that have no coaching duties.
Posted by PeaRidgeWatash
Down by the docks of the city
Member since Dec 2004
15210 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:19 am to
You mean the Alabama administration.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:19 am to
Saban doesn't spend shite on his program
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:19 am to
quote:

You mean the Alabama boosters.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
21946 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:20 am to
That money has to come from somewhere. And I don't think it is feasible to raise ticket prices right now
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33793 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:20 am to
Nah, man. You didn't know? Saban's spending that out of his own pocket.
Posted by Jesus Prejean
Member since Jan 2012
258 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:22 am to
Bama wasn't spending at those levels before Saban. But then again LSU's spending went way up under Saban also, to Miles's benefit.
Posted by harry coleman beast
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
52210 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Saban spends


Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Bama wasn't receiving money at those levels before Saban
fify
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34145 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:23 am to
bama is in a much better position financially.

Jindal gutted LSU. Athletics was forced to step up and help academics and that left athletics in a 2M deficit.

Posted by GABlueDog
Marietta, GA
Member since Dec 2008
8045 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Bama wasn't spending at those levels before Saban. But then again LSU's spending went way up under Saban also, to Miles's benefit.

See my sig quote.
Posted by harry coleman beast
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
52210 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:25 am to
ell whats the status of my JaCoCo-Kramer sleeve exchange sig pic? Tia
Posted by easy money
Member since Feb 2005
14420 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:25 am to
yeah, well, houses and cars for recruits aren't cheap.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:27 am to
Kramer's online image selection has been limited... things may have to reach creeper level 6 if you want it before the season.
Posted by TigerSaint
GA
Member since Dec 2004
212 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:29 am to
His players are also "spent" for the most part from their time served under his regime.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75135 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:30 am to
It's no secret Alabama has more money than LSU.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48264 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:41 am to
More so than coaching and recruiting, this is why Alabama's football program has surpassed the LSU football program in the last six years.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
21946 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:43 am to
Serious question: where are they surpassing us? Ticket revenue? Sponsor money? Booster donations? merchandise sales?
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10666 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Serious question: where are they surpassing us? Ticket revenue? Sponsor money? Booster donations? merchandise sales?



My guess is all of it. Even though they have Auburn to compete against they still can out-resource us. They don't have a plethora a FBS and FCS programs in LA taking away money and resources from boosters, fans and the state. Every dollar spent on USL, SLU, McNeese, La Tech, NLU, McNeese, Nichols, and so on is less money for LSU. I would hope that Troy and UAB start to gain a following and alumni base that starts to take a trickle away from Alabama.

Plus, they have boosters who are more willing to bend the rules. Plus Alabama more than LSU has its identity tied to football. They spend more and give more resources to football than LSU because they have to.

LSU under the Longs had a great academic reputation. In the South among public universities in the 1940s it was Texas, UNC, UVA, and LSU.

Through the years the State has devoted fewer resources to LSU and there's less money, time and energy for football. If LSU could have kept it's academic reputation it had it would be better able to recruit. LSU could have been like a big ten school with the best academics in the SEC and great football players. It could still have a generous acceptance rate for instate kids and have great graduate programs that would have put LSU on par UNC, Texas, and UVA.
Posted by Rollie Fingers
Poster Emeritus
Member since Feb 2008
7427 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:57 am to
Being at the game yesterday, its apparent they are really whipping us in slutty broads wearing winter boots which is a far greater tragedy.
This post was edited on 11/10/13 at 11:58 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram